So they're going to remove the always connected Kinect requirement while still selling it bundled with the system for 500 dollars?
Why? They talked about how "it makes everything better and is integral to Xbox One" but now they're backing down but still not releasing an SKU without it? Doesn't make any sense. Then again the whole DRM stuff also didn't make any sense...
You do realize that they're giving Battlefield 3 and Saints Row The Third along with a couple more games starting in early July, right?
Here's the quote of one of the tweets;
"B.Honey @BloodyBHoney
.@winterkewl @cwgabriel @NicholasFolsom Oh yeah. Real interesting panel to wine about how hard being a white dude is. http://bit.ly/11Q7mEK"
I love how they're still clinging dearly to the "white male shaming/check your privilege" bullshit to prove that they're right while bringing nothing ...
"The used games stance is invalid now."
Mandatory Kinect one is not.
Pay to play online and barely get anything more one is not.
TV focus one is not.
500 dollar price one is not.
You still don't seem to get why some people still insist on not getting it.
"The xbone hasnt even released and doesnt get a redo?"
Even you just called it xbone while trying to defend it. So it's safe to assume that it has no chance left at this point.
Joking aside, I'll probably buy one when its price drops below 250 dollars, gets a couple of good exclusives and if they ditch the mandatory Kinect requirement.
I'm pretty sure most people were aware that this was going to be the over the top military version of "Marley and Me" the moment one of the developers said that the dog was "someone" we "care" about.
It still costs 100 dollars more and still has mandatory Kinect requirement though.
"I preferred the console as they announced it."
Ahahahaha oh wow...
"To clarify, the affected territories are: Bahrain, Lebanon, Romania, Oman, Slovakia, Malta, Cyprus and Iceland.”"
I'm not trying to be a dick here or anything but having 8 countries in your "non available list" is far better than having only 21 in your "available" list. Also, like Xaphy stated before, you can create a US or EU account if the service ends up not being available on launch day in your country. That's what I did (living in Turk...
I'll be sure to keep that in mind and try not to annoy you the next time I'm "speculating" about something...
/s
She's born around early 80's. It's not her considering Quiet looks like she's in her early/mid 20s in 1984.
Could be related to the End.
Damn straight!
I've just saw the 15 minute long intro on YouTube and as someone who've played every single Metal Gear Solid game out there except for Peace Walker and Portable Ops, I can say that it was the best damn opening for any videogame ever.
The way that they tell the story alone is mindblowingly good. The way that the [SPOILERS FOR INTRO] character switch happens towards midpoint and the way everything ends makes YOU feel responsible for the fate of Sarah while giving you a ...
I wouldn't believe most of the things I've seen in the video to be honest. Especially when the author keeps saying that these things are possible because "Kojima likes to mess with people". Most of the stuff shown are just stupid, baseless speculation, including the stuff shown about Gray Fox. Video says he was missing an eye in MGS and that it fits with the Snake we've seen in the trailer. Meanwhile, Frank Jaeger is known to have both of his eyes intact in MG and MG 2. ...
>Games Like Skyrim
-Dark Souls
This is a joke, right?
"Story by Brenna Hillier"
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh man... For a second thought it was written by some actual human being.
For the ones who don't recognize the name (which is a good thing); she's the one who wrote this "amazing" piece:
http://www.vg247.com/2013/0...
"...us girl gamers."
Thanks for invalidating your opinion without the need for any further comments made by other people.
OT: As long as they don't look pants on retarded, it's fine. Saints Row 3 girls back in E3 2011 is the perfect example of terrible "booth babes" for instance.
"its terrible sexist storytelling at its finest"
Because they just can't be trying to tell that some people wouldn't give up this sort of thing, even in a post apocalyptic world right? It just can't be a commentary on the human nature.
They only could've added this scene because they think women are inferior and are only good for doing a lap dance half naked for petty cash... /s
Just grow up already.
Electronic Theatre! The website that brings you press releases that announces the obvious.
I mean really? You guys really got nothing else to publish so you just push out as many press releases as you can onto your site?
"...and don’t create characters that we can care about."
Because I totally ended up caring about Anakin Skywalker in Star Wars prequels and any of the characters in Spielberg movies released post 2000, deeply.
They know they've become soulless sellout hacks and are doing everything they can to prove otherwise.
It's just like what Donnieboi says. It had the hype of SR 2 behind it but considering how idiotic 3 ended up being, I'm pretty sure it won't sale as good as 3.
"Dubstep gun? Unbelievable."
Couldn't agree more. They took this whole "over the top" bullshit to the next level solely to try to give the game its own identity. SR 1 and 2 was more than fine with what it had and they should've kept it the way it is instead of ma...