thats funny.....
Top Gamers & other 360 fanboys stop importing japanese 360s you wont make any significant difference.....
by the way the fate of 360 in japan would be decided when those rpgs are released....
it would obviously look the same... they would be stupid to spent that much time on a game that is already a year old and many people have played it...
and the hype for this game is not what it was a year ago...
instead they should spend their time on a new game.....
or would come till the end of 2007 that can be on one console and not the other technically...
both are very powerful and the difference might appear later...
but then again developer can do miracles if they try to...
in the last gen generally xbox games looked better but few ps2 games were right on par with the xbox...
thats the same thing that would happen this generation but would start later because no console is fully utilized now...
mgs:substance
gta
spliter sell
and oblivion...
by the time a game is ported the hype is gone and it never sells that much...
i cannot think of a game that did that with considerable amount of delay....
it may be a great title but it would probably pass out as a sleeper title when compared to the hype of all the new games.....
they came to senses...
one of the developers said that next-gen consoles were too week for crysis....
i dont think anything coming out on any console or pc in the next year, is difficult to port to any next gen console (except for wii)...
as time goes on i think we would see games that can be only on pc but not any time soon...
ps3 is a step way way ahead of ps2....
wii is game cube with a new stick to dance with...
who said you could beat EA but this dosnt mean that they make great games....
i hardly buy any EA game save for (Fight Night)
but 360 is a bargain...
bargain is if the two products are compareable...
wii is like ending up bying a bicycle while u intended to buy a car...
with ea.....
ubisoft produces the most high quality games while ea produces same crap every year....
but i think wii cant beat EA.. wii is a gimik itself.. a new game cube..
they would realise that wii is a gimik...
it would go down after the initial burst...
360 have better chances of goining up this time..
and ps3 would definitely go up...
are cgi
soon someone would put you in a museum for taking fanboyism to such new heights....
and 360...
i wont be a ps3 exclusive..
i read that somewhere it is coming for 360 too..
look pretty average...
many people who wanted to play this game badly have already played it... i think it would sell much less on ps3 its old game's port..
and for that reason the next oblivion would again be a 360 exclusive.....
i would be more interested if it was 3rd person rather than fprpg....
first person games on consoles i just couldnt want them less.......
but doesnt make great deal of difference now...
obviously games would not use it and movies can do with 50gb now...
200gb could be handy for tv series.....
of reading bulsh*t from TheMart, The power of green II on every ps3 article...
all that comes out of their mouth is horse sh*t....
show or event?
up with enough innovative gameplay and story, to make it something like gow or prince of persia.. otherwise it would be a button masher....those humdreds of enemies are not as promising...few enemies with quality gameplay would do better...
i still have doubts on this game (not the graphics part)...
talking about 360 fanboys comparisons with ps3 games. you people automatically decide how good 360 games are in comparisons to ps3s......
these games must be great like bioshock and gears...but you are wrong in saying that i want to play them....
i dont like fps at all, wether it be halo, resistance, or bioshock (though its art style is awsome)
the only thing prevents me from buying a 360 is the variety of games... if you take fps/tps out (which i agree a boatload of peop...
kaz & ken who posted on this site..., they bashed sony but had the most funny posts about sony... it was great to read them, almost always made you laugh no matter what console you favored...
1. it would only be 100$ less expensive atmost...sony would never release ps3 for less than 360... they want to make maximum profits...
so it would not have been a suprise if ps3 was sold at higher price without the blue-ray...
2. it would not be here early except for europe..except probably in more quantities...cell has a very low yield rate..
3. if the blue ray tanks ps3 would still be worth more than 600$ because of all the games and it has a dvd drive....i.e. ps3 not ...