any graphics argument that has nothing to do with their favorite platform being pc they will throw the "almighty" crysis in there and tout their favorite platform as having the best visuals, which never is true, if they stop doing these things, then they can be heard
are pcs really aheah of ps3, and do pc games really look better than ps3 games, crysis and arma 2 are the only contenders for that, and the fact is that they both revolve around 1 thing and thats that they aim for photorealism, and they look pretty good, but saying that they are just the best and better than the best ps3 exclusives is stupid, i dont care what the norm of agreement on the internet is about pc being the best or whatever, the fact is ps3 has 2 cgi movie developers working for it...
you still dont get it if you still havent got it the cell and all that power 7 stuff is all supercomputer stuff i guarantee launch games for ps4 will look like the top cg movies out if theres anthing to learn from this gen its dont let numbers fool you example ps3s 512mb ram for rsx but forgetting its 1.8 tflops processing power thats why we have games like kz2 and mgs4 and pc developers and pc fans are left scratching their heads, why? my friend chances are ps4 won only have this tech but li...
if sony would make factory upgradable hardware for ps4 like every 5 months, not that the hardware for the whole gen isnt strong enough to bring out some impressive stuff, but having upgradable hardware custom designed by nvidia and sony and toshiba and ibm every like 5 months, ps4 would be a beast
it would have to be crysis and crysis warhead, it may look like most on the internet hail it as the best looking game ever and that it still is, but that internet thought is fueled by cryteks hype of their engine and pc fanboys that back it cause its the only pc game that looks good, truly its getting old, its not and never was the best looking game
nuclear weapons if you think a nuke is supposed to leave a crater unless its an underground nuclear test, stop trying to take dumb shots at the game its getting pitiful now
its dropped in quality several times, the game was originally meant to look like cgi ingame, when it was using the white engine on ps3, but now it looks like not even next gen from ff10, it really doesnt look like a next gen jump from final fantasy 10 now, but before the multiplat announcement, it did
like ive said, this isnt halo and its not resistance and its not even killzone 2, those are fantasy genre games, this is a real war simulator, theres a ceiling in how much you can put in it, its MODERN WARFARE, infinity ward put in the most up to date military tech in the game and the stuff coming out in the next 5 years, what more could they have added, you all are just trying to bring the game down to uncharted 2 and killzone 2s level
ok i can admit cod mw2 has flaws, not big but it has flaws but if a flawed game shouldnt have a 10 then no game should have a 10 but this game is 100% different than cod4 despite what all the cod haters claim and the games players arent nearly all noobs just look at cod4s leaderboard and check all the horrible records that means nowhere near that 10 million + gamers are noobs a small percent from that are
are pcs really aheah of ps3, and do pc games really look better than ps3 games, crysis and arma 2 are the only contenders for that, and the fact is that they both revolve around 1 thing and thats that they aim for photorealism, and they look pretty good, but saying that they are just the best and better than the best ps3 exclusives is stupid, i dont care what the norm of agreement on the internet is about pc being the best or whatever, the fact is ps3 has 2 cgi movie developers working for it...
such as:
"yeah we know uncharted 2 and killzone 2 look good for console games, but crysis is the best no contest" lol
and
"yeah, no console game can ever hope to come close to the almighty crysis that looks better than wall-e" lol
these are my all time favorites, but still suprising
you still dont get it if you still havent got it the cell and all that power 7 stuff is all supercomputer stuff i guarantee launch games for ps4 will look like the top cg movies out if theres anthing to learn from this gen its dont let numbers fool you example ps3s 512mb ram for rsx but forgetting its 1.8 tflops processing power thats why we have games like kz2 and mgs4 and pc developers and pc fans are left scratching their heads, why? my friend chances are ps4 won only have this tech but li...
i cant begin to wonder how launch titles alone for ps4 will look
if sony would make factory upgradable hardware for ps4 like every 5 months, not that the hardware for the whole gen isnt strong enough to bring out some impressive stuff, but having upgradable hardware custom designed by nvidia and sony and toshiba and ibm every like 5 months, ps4 would be a beast
it would have to be crysis and crysis warhead, it may look like most on the internet hail it as the best looking game ever and that it still is, but that internet thought is fueled by cryteks hype of their engine and pc fanboys that back it cause its the only pc game that looks good, truly its getting old, its not and never was the best looking game
nuclear weapons if you think a nuke is supposed to leave a crater unless its an underground nuclear test, stop trying to take dumb shots at the game its getting pitiful now
cause ps3 fans didnt make the list thats an easy answer, its not on there cause its WAAAAY better than the original
then see whos "bored" of the game im sure not and i got it the first day and have played it every day
your an idiot mw2 blows this 2 year old garbage out of the water get raped
its dropped in quality several times, the game was originally meant to look like cgi ingame, when it was using the white engine on ps3, but now it looks like not even next gen from ff10, it really doesnt look like a next gen jump from final fantasy 10 now, but before the multiplat announcement, it did
that crap only looks best to pc fans its good looking only if your going by its use of real world environments its far from best looking
if you believe that
uncharted 2 and demons souls have been out for about 1 month or 2 and i still havent picked them up, but i picked up mw2 today
like ive said, this isnt halo and its not resistance and its not even killzone 2, those are fantasy genre games, this is a real war simulator, theres a ceiling in how much you can put in it, its MODERN WARFARE, infinity ward put in the most up to date military tech in the game and the stuff coming out in the next 5 years, what more could they have added, you all are just trying to bring the game down to uncharted 2 and killzone 2s level
ok i can admit cod mw2 has flaws, not big but it has flaws but if a flawed game shouldnt have a 10 then no game should have a 10 but this game is 100% different than cod4 despite what all the cod haters claim and the games players arent nearly all noobs just look at cod4s leaderboard and check all the horrible records that means nowhere near that 10 million + gamers are noobs a small percent from that are
lol
you need help if you do
bad company 2 fanboys flood mw2 articles if bad company 2 was the better game then you shouldnt have to flame mw2 to make bad company 2 look better