Why do you guys against parity now when you want parity last gen when x360 has better graphic card and more flexible ram?
I think Gut example is abit off. Here is a better example.
FH2 = Uncharted 2/3/TLOU graphic
DC = Crysis 2/3
CRYSIS 2 look really photorealistic compare to more artistic graphic of UC2/TLOU (and im talking about console, not PC) but crysis 2/3 never get graphic award, well not until Ryse, but UC2 did. And like you said, what could be more beautiful than realism right so i don't get it either why crysis didn't win graphic of the year back then...
why would people want to spend extra to play PS4 game at 720p and 30fps?
you sir know what it is to play a real gem. I went out and bought Xbox one right after they announce a remake/reboot phantom dust at E3. No question ask.
There are other games to look forward too for xbox one, some i think are real gem:
- Project Spark:
. it need some serious marketing cause I don't want another Gem like this go unnoticed like Phantom Dust. This game is so deep, i don't even know where to begin. Been playing the beta cons...
Shhhh. Be careful.
You just give them the idea to not only name their club, but draw symbol/logo directly onto their in game cars collection. They will split up into 2 team, one is masterchief and the other one with a pony symbol. So everytime they see a car online with a pony symbol, everyone just gonna butt ram him and post it on YouTube. They might even be able to create an in game custom bucket list and get XP for doing it too in game.
I don't know...
I don't know, I think the option to use external HDD would have been better.
It could do well if the price is right.
However, that $25 self assemble VR card box from google might be the one to push VR forward.
At the end if all of this VR are just gimmick, then the only one that might survive is that google card box.
so what happen after 60 mins? How do you do infinit loops?
so what is the point of the 60 mins limit if you can loop it infinitely?
This topic and the other graphic comparison articles are not debatable. It is like you see a red car and say it is red, but a color blind guy keep on insisting that it isn't.
@superman & eonjay,
So if PS now depends on the amount of contents it can provide, getting a subscription of let say $10/month (including about 100s of developers and Sony included), do you think they can make a profit? I haven't include in the cost for the virtual spaces, maintaining the contents, and the actual amount of developers (in the thousands as Sony claimed) yet.
Do you think it is a viable option for everyone?
Let take Ne...
Now how all of this will be problematic for Sony:
1. Sony doesn't have the large cloud infrastructure network that they can rent out to developers/publisher. They have to rent virtual space from Rackspace no less just to run their PS Now/Gaikai service. Do you think Sony can afford to rent out virtual space to others when they are renting it themselves?
2. PS now services depend greatly on the amount of contents that they can deliver (mostly from 3rd pa...
@Twelve
I don't think you understand/see the bigger picture in this and why this might be problematic for Sony in the long run. Let me expand on your perspective on how this works.
First and for most, think of MS Azure (cloud infrastructure) like how Amazon works. MS can rent out this virtual space to developers/publisher for a small fee (MS been trying to keep it cheaper than Amazon to compete).
1. Advantage for Developers:
...
@dragonknight and others
go watch Jim other videos like "always DRM is dumb dumb dumb" or "Xbox one and the end of ownership", what are the things he is complaining about?
1. FORCED kinect (that he doesn't want)
2. He want console to focus on games only, not on other entertainment like TV and such.
3. DRM is dumb (only profit publisher and gamespot, and connection issues)
so now MS reverse all of that: ...
looks at No limit, same argument as you and he also said that it was his own opinion. Why so many disagree? what disagree/agree actually mean on here?
@ziggurcat
True, and that is exactly what i did last gen by listing that there are more games on x360 (regardless if it was indie or kinect or also available on pc) purely based on the LIST, but people on here disagree and said that isn't FACT. Why it is true now in this case? What make it a "FACT" in this case but not back then? Just want some explanation Ziggurcat, or anyone else for that matter.
Furthermore, if just based entirely on a list of games...
well i think Google might actually got something here:
Google I/O 2014 - Cardboard: VR for Android
Look it up on youtube.
Where else can you get a VR for $20, given you need an android phone, which i assume most people do.
real gamer does exist. It was defined by Sony themselves when they were talking about that unreleashed new game Bloodborn, "real game for real gamer".
Apparently everything else are either fake game or play by pretentious gamers perhaps?
let just put things into OBJECTIVE perspective of what each game offers:
FH2 vs DC
Type:
- FH2 (open world, SP +MP + seamless switch)
- DC (closed Tracks = online only)
Cars:
- FH2 (200 - model after Forza 5 = detail model)
- DC (~55 - detail model)?
Customization:
- FH2 (extensive like Forza 4/5, part & appearance)
- DC (?)
Contents/Events:
- FH2...
This parity is pure BS. Forget about UBI man, buy my up coming game instead.
It is EXCLUSIVE for PS4.
- no PC, just because it can ran everything (resolution/frame rate) much higher doesn't mean it has better game; obviously it won't be getting this revolution AAA game ONLY on PS4.
- no Xbox one, I don't want to downgrade the experiences due to resolution/frame rate downgrade.
Setting:
- Title: Gone Little Twiggy
-...