Ahem, Tennis For Two is the most important.
And then game number 1, 2, 3, 4.....(ETC) on the Magnavox Odyssey.
Chocobos!!!! WOOOOOOOO.
http://www.gamersmint.com/w...
Bad AA is bad. ~_~
18.43 million copies?! Wow...............
WAAAAAAAAAAH, how was that trolling?! :(
OMG MY BUBBLE!!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOO.
O.O
What a deal.......No one can pass this up.
The game was worth 60 dollars in my opinion.
Great game, insane cutscenes, fun gameplay, insane story.
Wait, what's so funny?
I totally agree with Soldier.
Steam is an amazing FREE service with amazing customer service.
I don't want to get into a flame war, but would the same thing happen with XBL which costs money?
I think not. ~_~
Just to cover my tracks, this wouldn't happen with PSN either.
Sigh@BaseballFan.
Did you miss the "Hahah"?
Were you not observant enough to see the "Funny" in the "+Bubbles" section?
Sigh, don't tell us you're a 360 fanboy.
Edit, your profile says you only own a 360, and your avatar is from Halo. ~_~
Rofl.
Nice job proving our point though.
In the end of the review, they made it sound like the only good thing about Reach was the multiplayer.
No? I use Chrome.
I caught that error because my friends spell it wrong too.
They also spell "tomorrow", "tomarrow".
It bugs meh. ;3
Calling me a troll is quite an assumption to make considering I only pointed out a spelling error in your comment. ;3
"All your so-called "friends" at Merriam-Webster can spell "Definitely" correctly? Well Good...for...you!!!"
I think you ...
Assuming the reviewer is a normal gamer.
Odds are, he'll share approximately the same opinion as any other normal gamer.
That's the point of a review.
If that person liked the game, odds are, you'll like it too.
I'm not saying base whether or not to buy a game purely on reviews, but if you wanna know if a game sucks or not, read a review to find out. It's that simple.
Reviews aren't evil. Neither are review scor...
Hahah, +Bubbles, Cammander.
Nah man, these good reviews are just paid for. Every good review for PS3 games is legit. Get with the program.
-talks loudly towards the upper section of this long line of comments-
Wow, Jerry.
You said what I would have said if it weren't for the fear of losing bubbles. xD
Instead I've resorted to slight stealth trolling.
Well said anyway.....
Yeah, I think an overall score will end up being at least 8.7.
That's a great score.
I mean, GOW 3 got a 9.2.
If it even gets close to that.....I'll be impressed.
-sigh-.
Bungie delivered.
-facepalms PS3 fanboy (me) face in shame-
Now make meh a PS3 game. >:[
"It's not like they never have..."
ODLC (ODST) says "hi". ~_~
But Halo followers didn't care, it still sold a ton of copies and got great ratings....
Comfirmed? What is a comfirm?
No score, lul.
This game is going to sell so many copies.
Doesn't matter what score it gets. ~_~
@Below...That's because they won't want to waste their money on a garbage game.
Can't blame them.
I don't quite understand the list........
Define:Change.
Technically every game changes the graphics.
Whether it's simply improving the resolution, or using different textures. It changes all the time.
What's a giggty? xDDDDD