All Channels
Popular

bananlol

Member
CRank: 5Score: 16150

The ps3 can pull of over twice as many flops as
the 360, so id say its superior alright. 256+256==512, and half the ps3 ram is way faster than the 360 ram so id say its superior in that category too. The 360 gpu does pack more of a punch than the rsx, but then again a x86 processor is worthless when it comes to rendering graphics. Try disabeling your graphic drivers on your pc if you dont believe me, it will look horrendous.

The gamecube was also inferior to the x...

5685d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

It would be kinda creepy if the xbox listened to everything you said in the vicinity even while powered off. They should change the controller indication lights from green to read(we kno they can) and call it the HAL 360:D

5685d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I can se the point of this if it were for the purpose of playing a joke on somebody at a lan party, but against random people? I dont se the point, people would think you are good but you would know you sucked, completely redundant. I suppose if you installed it because you wanted to make a friend who suck happy while you play splitscreen i suppose it would serve some use. And its far less annoying than lag switches, i blody hate those. And you can often outmanuver these things as long as the...

5685d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Id say gt5 is the bigger dog since its you know, a bigger game. My statement is quantifiable, and can therefore be proven, can you prove your statement?

5685d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh good, people complain about trivial things like grass, pixels and slightly lower framerate. Now missing splitscreen would have been something to complain about.

5685d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

First, i do not currently own a ps3, just a 360, ds and a crappy pc. Personally i no emotional attachment to my consoles, for instance i like halo and mario, but i do not like the 360 and the ds.

The point i was trying to make was that if you look at it from a hardware perspective the ps3 is vastly superior to the 360. Now the reason 360 multiplats are often superior i that processors have been made a certain way since the early 80s. At first trowing in more transistors and...

5685d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Its a shame ps3 only owners doesnt get to play the first mass effect, the second one is great though(especially in these 5h fps clone times, thank god activision didnt buy bioware), but it comes up short compared to a legendary game like me1. Still, we have me3 to look forward too, and something tells me its going to outdo the both previous ones combined.

Its interesting, its often the second itaration in a trilogy that suffers. Well with the exception of star wars.

5685d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

But the last guardian... :(

5685d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

For me this years goty will probably be 3d dot game heroes or katamari forever, havent really decided since i havnt finished either(no ps3 access at the moment). Last year was a tie between uc2 and nsmbwii, on its own uc2 is clearly the superior game but nsmb had great assist from friends and booze, seriously never had that much fun with a game.

And youre wery wrong, the best halo is the second:D

5685d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

If TLG releases next year then yes, if not then there is no way to be sure.

5685d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

How is it inferior? Its not sonys fault some developers have yet to lern to use the cell architecture efficiently. Hell, i can only programm for x86.

Its like having a race between two equally good drivers, but you put one in a car and one in a plane. The only reason the one in the car winns is because the one in the plane doesnt know what to do.

5685d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Now wait a minute, the 360 version have splitscreen but the ps3 does not? Is this true?

5685d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

How do you conclude that?

5685d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Read somewhere a long time ago that 5600 rpm drives were the way to go. Something about 7200 getting to hot and games are optimised for 5400.

5685d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Technically that would work but than we would have to constantly change the angle of our eyes to coencide with the depth of the picture. And on top of that the residue from the information ment for the other eye would dilude the picture.

5686d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Mine was gta4/guitar hero 3. Lucky for me the only ps3 available was the uncharted bundle:)

5686d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

1: The properties of light makes it impossible to have a 3d big screen tv without horrible viewing angles (if anyone here own the ce of a crack in time test if the 3d-box art works at an angle, its the same tech the 3ds use). The only solution is polarized lenses but polarized 3d is crap compared to shutter 3d.
2: Whats wrong with wearing glasses as long as they are comfortable? Personally never use my glasses but thats just because they squeeze my nose and im to cheap/lazy to get ne...

5686d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Never heared of them either. Doesnt matter though, hardcore gt fans usually arent the kind to be bothered by review scores, they just want the damn game.

5686d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ff7 was great, didnt take itself to seriously but enough for me to care about the plot.

5686d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

You will always get terrible vieving angles on a no glasses 3dtv. Dont believe me? Lern som physics. And whats so bad with glasses? Its the smothest solution to a big problem.

5686d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment