I think the reason I've been given so many bubbles is because I don't talk crap about a console that I don't own.Also I try to follow the rules.I don't hate on people.I have a constructive opinion on things instead of just saying "this rules" or "that sucks".I think before I comment and I guess it shows in my bubbles.So just to be nice I'll throw you a bubble.
I know it went gold I've been eying this game like a hawk.It just seems an all gaming site would have either got it first and or reviewed first.I agree they do issue street dates on reviews a lot of times and thats what makes me wonder.But I'm mainly saying wait on some more reviews.I've been following this game very,very closely and this is the first I've heard of "no jump button".
You need therapy....years and years of therapy.And skerj 8 days and the getaway are not Rockstar games they're made by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE).I believe the other GTA games were on PC but sill console exclusive until like Vice City than they put GTA 3 all the way to San Andreas on Xbox.GTA was console exclusive for awhile.
It seems I remember X being the button for your feet.I wonder if auto-jump could be switched off.
Thats what I was questioning.I found it weird they had other five star games reviewed this month but gave Assassin's Creed (a four star game) game of the month.
Its not so much the site thats questionable its the timing of the review and the fact a lesser known site has it first.I do think its real.I wrote that as a just in case kinda thing and I feel people should wait and base their opinions on reviews from a lot of different sites than just the very first one only.I'm just saying wait and see.
Its not so much the site that is questionable its the timing of the review and the fact bigger more known sites haven't reviewed it yet but somehow this site has it first.Another thing to point out that I thought was weird is this site reviewed Ratchet and Clank and gave it a five star rating.They reviewed Assassin's Creed four out of five stars but yet gave Assassin's Creed game of the month.I like Ratchet and Assassin's Creed it just seems a higher rated game would have gotten their game of...
This review is questionable.
I agree, the guy playing really sucked.It looks like this was being shown
in Japan.I read somewhere people in Japan don't even like touching the right stick they like auto-aim.Anyway it looks great and I can't wait for November.
Twonky.It works good.
...looks awesome.That is a nice find.Can't wait till Nov 13.
The PS3 version looks so good.I pre-ordered the limited awhile back so I'm glad to see most of my worries disappear.Can't wait.
Makes me wanna go hug my PS3 or something.lol
How many times do I have to say its not a port.Those were ports.Dang.
Assassin's Creed isn't.
(edit)
Whoever disagreed is a Jackass.
You sound like a fanboy.And I don't need to defend Blu-Ray the proof is in the pudding.
Patrice said he said those things in September and for whatever reason they couldn't print it for a few weeks.I believe that most interviews don't come out for awhile after they did the interview.And apparently they resolved those issues considering it went gold.Anyway I think both versions will be just as good along with both versions of COD:4 because like I said they're not ports.Apparently MS's and Sony's people helped them get it done.
Theres a limited edition of Assassin's Creed for the PS3 also.They announced it at the same time they announced the 360 Limited Edition.And all the promotions I've seen have been promoting both versions.
Its been in production for four years.
Its 25 hours long.
http://blogs.theage.com.au/...