Well, it would have to be able to play games in double the resolution or framerate at least, and I'd have to be able to trade in my current ps4 for a really good price. Given that I'm a college student, the chances of this being a day 1 purchases are almost nothing though, if I ever get one at all. As long as the don't split that user bases, there's no real reason for me to ever get one.
I would say the reason bloodborne doesn't outrank other souls series game is because it is the worst game when looking at them as RPGs. Bloodborne has the worst RPG aspects of the series because the hard caps are super low, and there's only like 3 builds in the entire game.
I'm going to hard disagree with you on this. Let me start out by saying though, I'm glad this article isn't talking about diffuculty settings.
You know the first question I get every time I tell a non souls gamer that they're one of my favorite series of games?
"Oh, so you're a masochist, right?"
That's THE FIRST thing they say. No, I'm not. It's a good, fair game, that gives me an adequate challenge. Perceptions of dark ...
The games ask for your patience and ability to learn from your mistakes. That's it. It's way different from most games on the hardest setting where they just turn the knobs up to 11.
I might get a wiiu at some point when it's super cheap, there are a few games on it that I'd like to play.
I'm going to be honest, this level had no impact on me when I played it. The level was heavily talked about before the game's release, and was clearly there to try and spark controversy. The level wasn't trying to make a statement, it was trying to look like it was trying to make a statement. The plot of that game was so incredibly weak and incoherent that nothing from it has any impact.
That's what I was about to say. Ocelot isn't really even the bad guy lol.
Got it got PC and I'm happy with my decision after seeing this. I can play it at 60fps is opposed to 24. Bloodborne got really annoying sometimes with its framerate issues.
Sorry, I should have been more clear, I was trying to say that complaining about a learning curve is stupid. Some games have steeper ones than others.
Then you don't understand the point of the game.
The author spent multiple paragraphs talking about a learning curve. Dark souls has a steep learning curve that The several hours to several days to start getting decent at the game.
I respect That mayazaki isn't watering down his vision. If the game is too hard for you to beat, which it's not Anyone can beat it if they try, then don't play it.
Good thing I didn't get my hopes up... Love it when there's some awesome merch that I'm not going to buy.
It's because I believe you're diluting the game severely by lowering the difficulty. It's not the same game if you lower the difficulty
You're constantly online when you play this game, should all network functions be disabled in hand holding mode?
If it's"too Hard" for you, git gud or watch a let's play. Git gud means exactly what it sounds like, if you have a question abiit a hard area, and you need help figuring it out, souls players will help you. If you're just going to say the games are too hard, we're going to tell you to git gud.
The main problem with your idea is that you said naughty dog will have games that do poorly.
They always have had this issue.
This always happens dude. Graphics get better over time, which means that file sizes get larger. 18 gb is not a big game anymore.
Pretty hard when you're a college student.