out of all the money you pay for Live, dime of it goes into game servers. You know that? Meaning you are being forced to pay for something you already paid for.
and i just talked to 360 fans or fanboys who somehow thinks that PSN and Live are getting different game servers.
sad thing is PSN has more dedicated servers. lolol
From xbox fan site.
ahahahaah. i do enjoy all these xbots getting worked up on this.
They somehow think they are getting 1080p BF3. and that PSN and Live are different.
LOL. let me break it to you. Xbox is getting 720P. and PSN is getting same exact servers(like every other games) as Live.
You mad?
EDIT
5234d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment
they said that Live might be better since it might not have server issues. he was GUESSING. he even made it clear about that. LOL
BTw, PS3 and 360 version has SAME servers. Yes, the money you pay for Live does not go to any of the servers.
Again. are you in this much denial about this? SAD. and i can tell you are mad. haha
Even PlanetXbox admitted and you are still in denial about this?
here is a quote
" PS3 does appear to be the most capable of reaching proximity with the PC"
The both version runs natively at 720P. btw. Native resolution is different from upscale resolution. LOL, even my TV upscale everything to 1080p..
Love your sad attempt though nice try.
Just go look at metacritic.
Like more than 1/3 of 90+ games are exclusives on PS3.that is HUGE amount of games that are exclusives.
sad.
Gears 3 dont have AA.. thats a FACT.
AA typically use up about 20 to 30 percent of hardware's power. The fact that Gears 3 couldnt handle AA just goes to show that they had to abandon AA just to keep up.
Uncharted 3 has nice AA btw and did not cut back on anything.
cause code will get optimized more.
even more so for PS3. 360 will have grpahical improvement but not as much. There are signs that it is struggling to keep up. All the so called best graphics game are struggling from huge technical issues. Like framerates, sub hd, no AA. Again, gears 3 dont even have AA.
How does Uncharted 3 look better without making those technical sacrifices?? because there is more room to optimize just like what ND said.
there is difference between max and optimized.
As ND said, There are plenty of room for optimization on PS3. Most improvements are in 3d. even the floor is shown in 3D. 360 was never able to do it. it takes too much processing power.
Even if we are not talking about 3d, game looks amazing. Unlike 360 games which tries to keep up by cutting AA, framerates, stability and etc. I mean Gears 3 doesnt even have AA LOL. 5+ years after release and game still dont ha...
so much for games dont sell on PS3 bs.
Non FPS games usually sells better on PS3.
ND said in their previous interviews that there are plenty of room to improve which contradicts you fanboys.
It is just that the improvement will be smaller.
there is clear difference in fanboys saying this or that is max and ND saying there are still plenty room to improve, but not as big.
GT5 have everything remade. hence the reason why it took 5 years.
Forza 4 is update of Forza 3. Not even kidding about this. They used same stuff from Forza 3 and added features to it.
I mean i know you are a desperate fanboy and all, but get your facts straight.
how do you still have 2 bubbles? Lol.
There is no denying it.Look at Uncharted 2. Highest rated exclusives on PS3 and 360. second highest rated game ever on both PS3 and 360.
Yet, fanboys talk about sales all the time. Yet, they forget MS's partnership with Viacom, earth largest TV conglomerate.
I repeat this, but you can market tampon as nose bleed stopper successfully with that amount of marketing back up. MS dropped 500 million dollars on Kinect marketing like nothing.
Forza
Better UI.
Better background graphics
Better customization.
Better univeral car graphics.
More cars with good graphics
GT5
Better Premium Car graphics
Amazing day and night cycle with graphics
Amazing Weather simulation
Better Physics
Better Damage
More Cars
More Track Customization.
More accurate in details.
Unbeatable variety in races and etc.
Compat...
MS has marketing partnership with Viacom the media conglomerate giant. The biggest TV conglomerate on earth.Forza as a result got a huge backing.
As for Forza 3, it is out longer on bigger userbase. what is the point of comparing sales over YEARS vs GT5's sales over LESS than 1 year?
Fact is when you are looking at a same period of sales. GT5 sold 5.3 million while Forza 3 sold 1.3 million both in 6 weeks.
GT5 outsold Forza 3 by a lot wit...
this is what Da Truth means when he say "suddenly sales =/= quality"
360 fanboys always bring up sales and forget about review scores. Now a PS3 game out sells Forza by multiple times, 360 fanboys change their usual argument of sales.So which is it 360 fanboys? Does sales= quality or not? make up your fanboy minds.
BTW, Forza is a good game, but does not excuse for MS only releasing 2 exclusives entire year.
@Aloren
...
this is supposed to be "PAINTED" textures. not same as other games.
Meaning they would have to go and fix every single textures. you dont have to do that for Crysis 2.
While his game may not be best looking on consoles, i think he did a great job.
But on PC, he half assed the shit out of it.
He previously said that PS3 MORE POWER, but it requires tons of work to get them because it is hard to code for. Also, cause it lacks development tools. and etc.
this is the same "TECHNICAL EXPERT".
Also, you shouldnt say Crysis 2 and technical at the same time. you just proven your self an obvious- rtard- troll.
Crysis 2 suffers from tons of technical issues. SUB HD, Frame rates, Pop ups. low poly counts and etc. go read it on DF o...
Eurogamer did give them the lowest score which was 8/10.
i do think they were bit harsh though, but w/e. I dont think they are biased. They are usually bit harsh on popular games and more lenient on less popular games.
maybe it is for publicity. personal tastes. who knows.