You guys are missing the vital point, the reviewer is the biased one. The whole problem, as McScroggz said, is the wrong man for the wrong job. Phil Kollar was reviewing the game as Phil Kollar, not as the average gamer. This is the major problem with additional reviews above, the reviewers aren't the same person.
Why do you think Supreme Court judges serve for life? It's so the interpretation of the Constitution stays consistent. This is the main problem for all game...
You guys are missing the vital point, the reviewer is the biased one. The whole problem, as McScroggz said, is the wrong man for the wrong job. Phil Kollar was reviewing the game as Phil Kollar, not as the average gamer. This is the major problem with additional reviews above, the reviewers aren't the same person.
Why do you think Supreme Court judges serve for life? It's so the interpretation of the Constitution stays consistent. This is the main problem for all game...