alexkayl

Contributor
CRank: 11Score: 20300

For what I've read, the Bless combat footage shown wasn't final, but we'll have to wait and see.

4706d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Indeed, it doesn't cease to amaze :)

4826d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it will, when they focus more on polishing the game and less on creating more continents.

4917d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think Guild Wars 2 will play an important part in Rift's future. As for SWTOR, there's no secret - too much ambition and development costs and not enough return.

5002d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

But that's on PC, not on Xbox 360...

5042d ago 5 agree6 disagreeView comment

If they rejected Warface, then they're not entirely clear on their intentions. And by having a couple of F2P games doesn't mean they want every game to be free.

5042d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Things are starting to change, but a couple of games each year are still not enough to push more developers to it.

5042d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

I guess it just takes one of them to take the risk (and reap the rewards) and the others will immediately jump aboard.

However, since the PS3 (for example) has a couple of F2P games, rejecting Warface doesn't seem like a sensible option, but we'll see how things turn out.

5042d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

More and more, yes, but there are still resilient games such as SW: The Old Republic, Tera and Rift, among a few others.

5056d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You're right about the link, I made a mistake while adding it. Here's the correct one:

http://www.freemmostation.c...

5057d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't think that's the case. It's more of a parallel business opportunity for many developers than the only escape. Surely Ubisoft isn't developing F2P Ghost Recon Online because they don't think that Splinter Cell: Blacklist or Watch Dogs have any chances of being successful, right?

5060d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly. It's no coincidence that EA,Ubisoft, Codemasters, Valve (Dota 2) and more are betting on free-to-play. It's part of the future and quality is clearly improving, like it or not.

5061d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I agree. Free from the strict demands of a global publisher they may aim for another level of creativity.

5061d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

They have a tough road ahead, but let's see how they do with Warface.

5061d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I actually see your point and agree with you there, ATI_Elite. As long as the matchmaking is balanced, I see no problem there.

5061d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's shaping up to be one of the finest free-to-play games, with good production values and a dedicated team. Let's hope it's well balanced and not ruined by the cash shop.

5061d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Shame that Dust 514 won't be free-to-play, they could draw much more people to EVE Online that way, I guess.

5159d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

RuneScape is a love or hate thing, Free Realms is varied but kids are most likely to love it, adults not so much.

5279d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Totally agree, but it could be considered a MMORPG as much as a fighting game. Not much unlike Vindictus, but Rusty Hearts seems more like a brawler.

5291d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

True, but as mentioned in the article, games such as Warface or Hedone will use powerful engines and still be free-to-play. The 'low specs so everyone plays' seems more like an excuse to keep on using bad engines.

5308d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment