Sure it does. The setting and the world is very interesting. The gameplay should be a bit more diverse and less 'on rails' linear next time. The length should be longer too.
Maybe drop-in co-op too? I'm not a big MP fan, but I remember the debut trailer for this game, it looked like co-op would fit right in there.
Oh and please chill out with the QTEs.
I'd rather get a new Red Dead at this point tbh.
I've always seen AC 1 as a rough draft/prototype, and AC 2 as the refined final product.
So now we know that the new cycle is definitely not coming in 2019, cause ya know, Patcher.
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Fallout 4 should certainly not be the last Fallout game, however it should be the last one running on Bethesda's shitty ass engine which is honestly outdated, but it probably won't be that either.
Honestly, (some) people are reacting too harshly to this though. You can disagree without calling the guy a multitude of things. It's just an editorial, just one man's opinion, it doesn't have to be the same as yours. Once again, I totally disagree with him too. ...
They don't? They're humble and appreciative of the love they get from fans, or one could say they act humble, (I wouldn't, but still). Not the same as saying that they're a small developer.
Lol yes, but I meant as in that Toussaint is all fancy and shit.
Btw, if anyone's wondering why this looks so colorful compared to The Witcher 3's world, this new area is Toussaint. Untouched by war, this region is famous for its wines and stuff. Basically it's like the France of the Witcher's world.
The only season pass I've bought this year is TW3, and the first expansion makes it clear that it was worth it.
Debated getting the one for Arkham Knight, so damn glad I didn't.
This was such a bad game.
Then the system works. They consulted with the same kind of psychologists that casinos use. It's designed to to keep players hooked, even when they don't really want to be.
It's pretty great, but it's not the FIRST masterpiece of this gen. TW3 and Bloodborne were.
Apart from the introduction/tutorial which I assume will be in a mission or two, it is completely optional.
Different target audiences. Hardcore RPG fans generally don't care about online shooters, and hardcore CoD players would get CoD before anything else.
I hate these kind of "Why I won't be......" blogs. Nobody cares why you're not doing a certain thing among so many who are doing the same, you're not special.
@Showtimefolks
I get your point, but with the Witcher games, especially Witcher 1, it would take a long time to remaster it. TW 1 is outdated as hell, so much work would be required to update it.
RPGs in general are very huge in scale and content, remastering and/or remaking them would take a long time, most devs would rather focus on new games, and IMO they should.
Yes, Most of all it's the fps IMO. It adds so much to it. The added fluidity is amazing.
Prehistoric Far Cry?
I guess it was people who don't like Naughty Dog.