Its alpha testing, the game isn't in its best shape. They don't want people to see this early version of it because some people will start commenting negatively on it because they think this might be the final version which is not. Why would they show everyone a bugged out early version of the game?
Once I saw the Pre-alpha footage I was kind of scared. I don't mean that there were too many flaws, but I think they can actually improve a little bit more like adding a bit more destruction (based on what i've seen the destruction is great but limited)and removing that knife lunge shown on a video. Operation metro is probably their most complete map by now (since they aree showing it off so much) so the other map might have more limited destruction. If they work hard I think they cou...
@FragMnTagM
the assault is the new medic, not support.
i think theres still more. The single player is going to have jet missions and theres no jet pilot on the list. This list could be true. The ones i know are there and seem to be acurate. The characters look more promissing than i expected.
@callmedom94
multiple characters. the fault line and thunder run characters you play as are different.
i knew something was different when i went from battlefield 1943 to mw2.
I got the same picture as the article picture :D
a couple of months ago I heard from some article that you could completely destroy some buildings while others you can only blow the walls apart. Now im hearing you only can blow walls. What he said under the quote could've been an interpretation of the quote. What it could've meant is that some you can collapse while others you can't.
@MidnytRain
Now there is rubble left from buildings which can somehow be used to camoflauge or cover. Doesn't mean all building...
@ warprincess
ive seen at least 10 of your comments and all are anti BF3 and COD supportive. Now I would like you to shut up because it is getting real annoying. No im not a BF3 fanboy because I own more COD games than Battlefield and I can state a few bad things about BF3 that make sense. I just think BF3 looks interesting. You are obviously a COD fanboy, you are being immature not us.
That is how call of duty might die. If they release one every year, they will barely improve on each. Battlefield sold more and more popular since it entered consoles increasing its sales up to around 2 million (not sure exactly), then bad company 2 sold 7 million and now BF3 preorders is outselling MW3 preorders at a couple of stores. If COD doesn't take a step up by the time BF4 comes out COD will die.I like it when the competition steps up and improves their games. COD just milks.
I just think BF3 and MW3 are both good in their way. COD is fast action noob style and BF is more tactical and realistic. If u want quick easy fun COD is for u. If u like tactical more complex fun (its still fun u kno) then BF3 is for u.
@ Takoulya
If he wants to get COD then let him. Its not like hes saying crap about BF3 or any other game. I hate this bad sportsmanship and stereotypical crap about COD getting players under 12. Im probably gonna get a whole ton of disagrees by saying this because people probably think im supporting COD. Im not, im getting BF3 but that doesnt mean i should act like a fanboy and trash everyone else.
Dont think its all about the graphics, you dont know what battlefield 3 is running that makes it difficult for consoles.
I think the PS3 footage is great. Just because the PC version looks better because of higher potential people get pissed. What do you want them to do, downgrade the PC version so the console versions look better in comparison?
EDIT: For them to put 60fps in consoles they would have to cut the graphics and other features by half since it is runnin...
tthis shouldn't be a DLC at all. It was already in the game, they just took it away and put a price tag on it. Their making you pay full price for a puzzle with missing pieces. If you want the rest you have to pay extra.
their comparing multiplayer footage with single player footage, it isn't fair. Games always have reduced graphics during multiplayer for the connection to handle. Besides, i think BF3 looked good...real good
EDIT:
MW3 doesn't look that bad though on the background and on the characters, but still they should update their engine.
now all they have to remove is the little 12 year old noobs.
i think it is a form of insult
example:
MW3 you!
i nominated and awarded movements dbag of the YEAR
that doesn't mean battlefield can't win them :D
either you just want to break the record for most disagrees or you are stupid. Battlefield is a realistic fps, call of duty is an arcade fps. killstreaks are ridiculous, they help the ones who are winning. its like taking from the poor and giving it to the rich.
jets are more air fighters than ground attackers unless they have total air superiority. They can limit helicopters which could make sense having them in conquest. Im afraid they will overpower helis or attack ground troops too much though
@Inside_out
whoa whoa whoa whoa...so what your saying is that Call of duty's engine is more advanced than frostbite 2? Please reply with proof. That video isn't exactly good proof, i've seen frostbite 2 do better.