I'm getting some weird Y2K bug flashbacks.
Ditto.
And here I was considering buying a Bethesda game or two during Cyber Monday.
(facepalm)
Well, so many of its other April Fool's jokes have come full circle. We got playable Pandaren, a rerelease/remake of Warcraft 3, and an ogre that is controlled by players, so why not a mobile game?
I'm not looking forward to this, but I'm not too upset over it.
And here I am, with a copy of the Xbox One version of the game freshly bought from a recent gaming convention.
Wait, where did the game will be filled with microtransactions? Or will have microtransactions at all? Last time I checked, nobody's said anything about the monetization model at all.
Probably because of Diablo 3 for the Switch.
True, true, but is it really fair to judge a game by its genre? Shouldn't we be judging it by its developer?
Well, in the spirit of fairness, when is the last time Blizzard made a bad game. Like, a really bad game?
Well, yes. Microtransactions by definition are gambling, manipulative, predatory, and abusive. But, that doesn't mean they aren't kind of necessary to keep free to play games running.
It's beautiful and ugly at the same time. How is that possible?
Microtransactions are totally acceptable in one situation and one situation only: in free-to-play games.
Since Assassin's Creed Odyssey is not a free-to-play game, it is by definition totally unacceptable.
Probably not gonna be in the game. But who knows?
Typo
5 pictures to a slide? Now that's unwieldy. And probably not possible.
And make it long and unwieldy?
This is the lesser of two evils.
Darn. I was looking forward to The Wolf Among Us 2.
Maybe it has so many it's having trouble deciding?
My money is on another Ouya.