I'm not going to argue about you saying Gta Iv story was bad, because it's pointless.
But saying Gta V story was better? And Michael is one of the best protagonists? What's wrong with you? It's just a story about a zombie that .meets a kid, then they do some crimes, an old man with anger issues appears and the 3 do more crimes. Is that a great story?
Maybe but most of the mods are made to do what the companies should have done from the beginning, like I said most, not all.
And again most of the mods are free, that means the companies lose literally nothing.
They can do the same as Konami did with UnMetal or I think Snk with a fanmade Metal Slug, let the autors publish what they did and even let them gain some money.
I agree, not with the Far Cry part because I didn't play 3, but with the Assassin's creed part.
AC 3 was not a masterpiece, it had flaws but Ubisoft fixed that in Black Flag, then Rogue came and it was the same as Black Flag, it only had small differences. Maybe Syndicate and Unity were also good, mainly because of the movements, but it kept the essence. But in Origins and Odyssey the franchise was extremely different, it didn't feel like an AC game at all.
Is it really that fricking hard to respect someone else's opinion? Or at least if you won't respect it, then at least give valid arguments instead of just hating for no reason.
It's not like Gta advance exists, right?