Sure.
FTC excludes PC and Switch in their arguments
Their case is weak as 💩
It’s the horrible rich wife syndrome
“What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is also mine!”
Phil said ask and you shall receive.
They just never imagined they’d buy a whole publisher. Insiders have already said Sony’s plan was to contract Bethesda to make multiple PS exclusives.
You posted this using what? You’re probably browsing online as we speak.
@lodossrage
You talking about old ass games from 1-2 generations ago. Alan Wake eventually came to PS. Splinter Cell Conviction and Dead Rising were the only true exclusives.
Final Fantasy 7, 16, and SF5 are NEVER coming to Xbox platforms.
Where did the money come from to make SF6? And not just make it but make it for Xbox, PS, and PC? Sony funding.
Cmon think about that.
@lodossrage
You seem mad. We've been told for years Sony funded SF5. That is a lie. They blocked it from coming to Xbox just like they did with Xbox. And honestly I'm not mad at them...if I were Sony I wouldn't do anything to help Xbox and its struggling games portfolio.
Sony also paid to keep Ghostwire Toyko and Deathloop off Xbox. Phil said I'll raise you one and just buy the publisher. Sony was going to make more of these deals.
Never announced for PS.
What games were pulled? Starfield was never announced for PS5. Ever.
Sony fans wanted Xbox to get more exclusives. Now they don't like the way they obtained them. Crazy.
Curious SF5 couldn't happen because Capcom didn't want to fund it.
So why did they fund SF6 and make it multi-platform? Sony helped them with that one?
So it’s not true or is it true?
Sounds fairly representative of real life. Only one planet that we know of in our own Solar System has advanced multicellular life.
Let’s a go!!
It wasn’t awful at launch. It was missing Forge and Co-op… the campaign, graphics, sound, and multiplayer were still great experiences. Halo infinite had a content problem not a quality problem
Timed for Sony means lifetime