I know i'm getting ripped off, EVERYONE is.
Look at how much cars are sold for, yet they only cost 1/10 of that price to manufacture.
Same with games, most new games are $60, even though they cost around $1.00 to manufacture. I know they devs need to make up money for the developement costs, but they still rip us gamers off by charging that much.
And how is MS ripping me off? give me the names of things they are ripping me off on.
It's a fact that all companies are in this for the money.
I'd rather see $ony charge for PSN. They could upgrade it and increase profits. But they think that their bad service is a plus to the ps3 and draws more people to buy it. Why won't they charge for it and increase it's features with the money they make?....they are stupid and out of touch.
MS and Nintendo know how to make money.
If only $ony used it's brains like MS, they wouldn't be losing $600 million, per quarter, on there games division.
@tallfag - ps3 games always look washed out and muddy compared to 360 games, kz2 uses dark color's to hide it's bad details, rainbow 6 vegas 1 & 2 look like vaseline has been smeared across the screens. Most ps3 games look dull compared to their 360 counterparts
@cereal killer - yeah sure. I'm no fanboy, I give credit where credit is due. It's not my fault that ps3 is usually on the losing end 99% of the time, im just pointing out facts.
XDR RAM is 4.5 times faster?? hahahaha, is that why XDR RAM is notorious for it's unusually high latency? higher latencies are bad.
ie. 400 MHZ 2-2-2-5 RAM is faster than RAM with slacker timings. So you go do your research.
"3.2 GHZ RAM must have VERY high latencies, meaning that LOTS of CPU clocks will be wasted on accessing the data in the RAM, the RAM itself is very fast indeed, but accessing it will waste many CPU cycles, lowering CPU performance. theyve sacficied...
Honestly, I didn't even bother looking at the pictures, I know what the outcome will be.
360 most likely has a bit better lighting and skin texture's.
Ps3 has less lighting and is darker, to hide the less detailed texture's.
Trust me, i've seen my fair share of muddy textures, all on ps3 games by the way.
Ps3 has hardly 1080p 60fps games, let alone the 1080p 120fps that was promised. All the 1080p ps3 games are basically PSN titles
I play ALL my 360 games in 1080p. :)
ANYONE who move's their xbox around, while it's playing games, deserves their disc to be broken.
Thats like blaming a car for hitting someone....when the person ran infront of it.
Don't blame the 360 for scratching the disc, blame the moron who was dumb enough to move a piece of electronics that is spinning a disc.
EDIT------
apena89, Ps3 has bad hardware, a poor graphics card, really cheap thermal paste on the cpu/gpu. Thats why ps3's are ...
So much for the almighty cell.
512 shared GPU RAM > 256mb GPU RAM
Thats why the 360 can pull off such complex textures, colors and enviroments. Ps3 games look dark, have muddy texture's and most of the time, bad framerate.
wow, you are a liar.
First you sent me a random message asking how bluray made the ps3 expensive, I won that arguement.
Then yesterday you send another random message asking why I hate sony so much, and accused me of not being a gamer. I also won that arguement.
I just checked my PM's, and you started every message.
And no i'm not selling my ps3, there's still 2 games I really want to play.
"Blade - Give it up with the leg humpers. Yeah, we are leg humpers because we support the more reliable system with more first party exclusives, better graphics, free online, web browser, and no RROD."
HAHAHAHA
- PS3 isn't reliable, it's failure rate is increasing while the 360's is decreasing. Yellow light of death and bluray drive failures are becoming an epidemic
- So the ps3 may have more exclusives, but how many of them are actually good? maybe 2...
Your the one who tries and argues with me by PM. You've started 2 arguments, both of which I proved you wrong. I was just responding to the last message you sent me.
Get over yourself.
There isn't going to be a show, the droids know i'm right.
All they can do is come in here and insult the 360 supporters. LOL
I really wanted this game to be something special. It failed on soo many levels, gameplay wise. It's just the little things that destroy it, like a flesh eating virus destroys a human.
The little things:
- guns are more accurate to spray from the hip than aiming down the sights
- spawn grenades on top of objectives
- assault class
- rocket launcher
- the maps get boring
- the maps seem too big sometimes, they need different versions of a...
Don't even compare it to a franchise like Wipeout. Motorstorm IS repetitive and get's borrring. Motorstorm 2 is basically the same as the first, except it has those zone things, fire, water, air and lava.
Here, I corrected your last statement:
It's fast, it's ruthless, it's repetitive, it's got poor track design and it's a little bit crazy.
I honestly don't think motorstorm should be a title regarded as " defining the playstation experience". Both of them are very average game's, low AA at best.
LOL @ the biased ps3 site.
http://www.lazygamer.co.za/...
PS3 version - " bad jaggies, muddy texture's and choppy framerate"
360 version - "But sadly, the PS3 version compares poorly to it’s Xbox and Pc counterparts"
The game looks worse on the PS3
The game plays worse on the...
After getting a 360, I realised that the ps3 just doesn't feel like a gaming console. The 360 feels just like the ps2, it was built for games. It's a hard feeling to discribe, buy a 360 and you'll know what i'm talking about.
Remember guys, Fallout 3 is barely playable on the ps3, thanks to the frame rate, loading and bad graphics. The 360 DLC will therefore be the superior version.
Enjoy your scraps droids.
LOL, I bet this pisses alot of droids off.
Final fantasy has been crap ever since FFX, doubt FFXIII will buck the trend.
It was never a huge franchise outside of japan, everyone seems to act like it has the appeal of GTA, Halo, Gears, Mario or something, in the west.