All Channels
Popular

Screw You, Anonymous, Screw You Very Much

Your recent attack on PSN isn't justice. It isn't some honorable cause that you have hearkened to. It is pure and utter malice. It undermines everything you have ever stood for. It undermines those that would support you. It undermines everything you have set out to accomplish.

Before you jump to conclusions, understand something: I, along with millions of PS3 owners support Anonymous in many of Anonymous' undertakings. Many Anonymous members are PS3 owners themselves.

We supported and joined you when you protested the WTO in Seattle in 1999.

We support and join you in your protest of scientology.

We support you and join you in protest of the Westborough Baptist Church.

We sent money to defend Julian Assange. Helped with the DDOS on Visa (and others.)

We support your unerring efforts to bring about global change on many, many fronts.

Some of us have even supported George Hotz.

In short, we are the very people that join those protests and help your numbers swell, help the monetary needs of those who fight the good fight.

Attacking PSN was not the good fight. If you have a problem with SONY, then go after SONY. Though PSN is their property, what you have done is nothing short of anger the very gamers, professionals, and individuals who would go to bat for you. Sure, it may mean a little inconvenience. We can't play our multiplayer games or download DLC or updates, it is true. But the one thing that you have affected, and the one thing you would be the least likely to criticize was Folding@Home. Thousands of PS3s were shut off from the Folding@Home project.

From the University of Stanford: "Our goal: to understand protein folding, misfolding, and related diseases
You can help scientists studying these diseases by simply running a piece of software."

Simply by running the app on my PS3 I am helping to fight these diseases. Now, you, Anonymous have interrupted the mission. You feel strongly about what happens in the world. We do to. And to better the world, we allow Stanford to use our PS3s through the PSN to help understand these diseases and fight them. We are just as passionate about this as you are in your fights to right the wrongs of this world. To impart your own justice.

Curing disease is justice. How many lives have you affected? How many people may die because you had to disrupt the computing power of thousands? Just to get your revenge? Too dramatic? Remember that this attack has sent a ripple through the efforts to fight cancer, Cystic Fibrosis, Sickle Cell, and many other diseases. It has disrupted efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

So, from those of us who have supported you for nigh on 2 decades and are helping to fight debilitating diseases, Screw you. Screw you, very much.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5476d ago
Changed from Failed to Pending
Christopher5476d ago
Changed from Pending to Failed
Christopher5477d ago
jack who5476d ago

Anonymous is not your personal army

phosphor1125476d ago Show
thorstein5476d ago

You didn't read the post thoroughly did you?

blackburn105476d ago

I really don't care what Anon has done in the past. These recent events have shown their true colours, The threats, the attacks, the inconveniences. And now the lies, the cyber terrorism. the identity theft and the blackmail. Sing all the praises you want be they are nothing but cyber mafia. Do what we say or suffer.

I don't believe they were ever for the people if this is what their members do when they don't get what they want. They already talked about attacking Sony employees and exposing peoples info online. What next? Arson? industrial sabotage? Are you going to storm Sony's buildings and kill everyone? Anon is so stupid to have members who they don't know. They could be recruiting killers and thieves and would know how far they would go. And they sit in their ivory tower while their members do what they want and don't care who it affects.

coryok5476d ago

anonymous wont be changing anything by going after sony, sony is obligated to do everything within its legal power to protect its investors.
what sony is doing may not be agreeable to anonymous, but that doesnt make sony at fault. anonymous should be trying to change government, not the people who act within the law.
name me one good thing that has come out of anonymous' attacks on sony. even if anonymous succeeded in bankrupting sony (which wont happen) other companies will fill the gap that is left in the market and they'll take the same actions to protect their investors
the only result that can occur from this in terms of anonymous is anonymous loosing influence, if sony is brought down, another steps up, and after that another will. things like this projects research being halted is a big loose for the world, but thats not even the half of it as there is potential for actual change, but that potential is being squandered by people who dont know how to use it. the more they fail the harder it will ever be to change, gotta pick your battles...

tl;dr if anonymous wants to make change they need to attack government, not the people who are being governed

Elwenil5476d ago

If Anonymous wants change they need to vote and take other legal measures to bring about these changes, not act like common criminals and terrorists. As it stands, their actions have proven that all they deserve is a jail cell. They are not saviors, or heroes, they are no different than any other terrorist that causes harm and fear to draw attention to their agenda.

coryok5476d ago

im not saying its a good idea to attack government, just remarking upon how a bully attacks a 6 year old because he has candy that the bully wants instead of going to the candy store where the 15 year old bully will no doubt, get an ass kicking.

it seems so familiar in this situation

lex-10205476d ago

Wow. Am I the only person who actually read the entire blog post. Yes he STARTS off by saying that he supported Anonymous, but then he transitions into how their attack on PSN has impacted thousands through the folding at home process (something which I didn't even think about until now). He's not supporting Anonymous in this article. He's trying to show them that they are hurting countless people by this act. Well said.

unkn0wn5475d ago

No sh** he's not supporting Anon. I think the title says it all. I skimmed through it for about 3 seconds and thought, "my God, another Anon article." Regardless of whether or not he was supporting the group, we don't need another damn post about it. The very last thing we need is to perpetuate the debacle.

lex-10205475d ago

You're right we don't need another Anon article but this article is more about how the PS3 now can't be used to help cure disease rather than an article about Anon

Godmars2905476d ago

Two things you need to understand:

1) The Anonymous that's attacking Sony isn't the some one which which has done actual social and consumer good in the past.

2) There's been some basic, blind hatred towards Sony and the PS this gen ever since the PS3's price which is still an unforgiven crime to this day. That Anon lost any legitimate reason behind their attack after Holtz settled yet continued to do at the very least suggest the existence of such hatred. That people who feel such happily got involved.

Danielmccue5476d ago (Edited 5476d ago )

Theres been basic blInd hatred for anything popular for hundreds If not thousands of years.

God created the heavens and the earth, he created man and woman and thus declared "haters gonna hate"

JD_Shadow5476d ago

1. Try telling the EXTREME people that. Good lord (I don't think you're innocent by any means with not acting like your sane about this, but...)!

2. I agree there has been blind hatred, and that has to stop. The problem is that the trade off shouldn't be that Sony NEVER gets called on on ANYTHING. That would make the fanboys who think that just as bad as the MS ones. This is the problem on N4G right now.

I've never seen ANYONE NOT say Anonymous should not shoulder blame, yet everyone seems to think that we ARE saying that.

I've never seen anyone say that we SHOULD be allowed to cheat on multiplayer games or any of that stuff, yet they seem to put words in their mouths.

I've yet to see anyone actually say that Sony should share all the blame, yet people insist that's what we are saying.

That's the problem. Until we can get it through that we're not, even basically or implying, that we're somehow saying that Anon is innocent, or that we should be allowed to do the detrimental things or whatnot, but that using things like OtherOS or the CFW shouldn't automatically MAKE you a guilty party, we'll never get anywhere.

And this is assuming the people that are doing the above are NOT doing it just to troll or be retarded or using the "rules of the internet" to hold a discussion.

Let me put it to you this way: we are all anonymous in some form. So...shouldn't WE be considering OURSELVES a part of Anonymous, too?

Shadowstar5474d ago

"I've yet to see anyone actually say that Sony should share all the blame, yet people insist that's what we are saying."

I have seen this: Sony is to blame for getting in a fight with hackers in general and Anon in specific when they should have known what would happen. When someone is saying that it is Sony's fault for provoking the attack, like it or not, they are removing blame from the person/people who did the attack. Let's not do that, so I, and those like me, can stop mischaracterizing Anon supporters.

JD_Shadow5474d ago

What is your logic for saying that? You're insinuating that they cannot have it both ways when it's clear that that's what has been going on. It's just that no one wants to accept that we can have our cake and eat it too, here.

Just the way most have done with this entire thing.

Shadowstar5474d ago (Edited 5474d ago )

Let me start by saying the cake is a lie in the first place! (Sorry. I just had to do that. Portal on the brain still.)

I don't think they *can* have it both ways. Victim blaming is traditionally a method of removing culpability from the person who's actually at fault. Beyond that, when a crime occurs, you can't expect the victims of it (in this case, Sony and PSN users) to like the people saying "you had it coming."

As a side note, this is the second time I have been attacked by members of Anonymous for the heinous crime of having an account with some company that said something Anon didn't like.

thor5476d ago

"The Anonymous that's attacking Sony isn't the [same] one which which has done actual social and consumer good in the past"

Yes, it is. It's the same social force. Best would be if there were no groups of this kind.

Think of it this way. If Anonymous didn't exist, but the people who did this attack DID, would it have gone ahead? Obviously not! Anonymous' name and reputation gave them publicity to recruit people and a common goal. Then people acted upon this goal and you've seen the end result.

You're very quick to disown these hackers after the fact, but there was nobody claiming that this wasn't Anonymous as it was happening. Anonymous could now launch another attack - would you only consider it to be Anonymous based upon the results of the attack? It's very obvious that as long as Anonymous exists as a group that people want to be a member of, attacks like this could keep happening. Will you disown them after each successive attack, all in the name of Anonymous?

What if this happened?
- Anonymous bring down PSN for 3 weeks "wasn't Anonymous!!1"
- Anonymous bring down XBL for 3 weeks "wasn't Anonymous!!1"
- Anonymous bring down a major bank for 3 weeks and steal personal data "wasn't Anonymous!!1"
- Anonymous sell credit card numbers causing widespread fraud "wasn't Anonymous!!1"
- Anonymous attack government in name of "free speech" threatening national security "wasn't Anonymous!!1"
- Anonymous go on a crusade against a single individual who dares to call them terrorists which results in letterbombs, arson and death "wasn't Anonymous!!1"

How many attacks would it take by this group for you to realise that they are responsible no matter how much you disown those doing the individual attacks? These scenarios don't sound that unlikely so long as Anonymous are still able to recruit members from the internet - a place where anybody, reasonable or psychopathic, can exist.

thorstein5476d ago

This blog post is about consequences to actions by one group: Folding@Home has been affected. The power of the Cell processor and use of PSN has greatly increased Stanford's project to fight diseases since Folding@Home appeared on our PS3s. This attack has prevented the use of PS3s and PSN to continue this good work.

That is all.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5474d ago
Show all comments (44)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
Changed: credit url
Jin_Sakai4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio4d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing4d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster924d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit4d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing4d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster924d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
40°

Games Done Quick is coming to Europe for the first time with 3 days of Gamescom speedruns

The charity event will be streamed live from Gamescom in August.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago