All Channels
Popular
110°

Mass Effect 3 Ending: Change Could Have Empowered Game Writing

So now we know: BioWare is releasing free DLC this summer that will “expand on” and “add clarity to” the ending of Mass Effect 3. The ending as it stands will not change, despite fan outcry asking for the contrary for weeks now, but in some ways, perhaps this is the only move BioWare could have reasonably made.

In Ray Muzyka’s comments given in BioWare’s press release, he says the company hopes to find a middle ground between giving fans what they want (or at least, what BioWare thinks they want — we did a whole analysis on this possibility) and “preserving the team’s artistic vision.”

We’ve already discussed the idea of “artistic integrity” in this case, and why it is in no way harmed by completing a new ending. Many fans (and a few of us here at Game Front) believe the ending of Mass Effect 3 qualitatively isn’t good enough, so that colors the artistic merit debate greatly.

p.s. also linked a video about the clarity ending has nothing to do with original link information

Read Full Story >>
gamefront.com
sagapo5159d ago

Am I the only one here who thought the ending was beautifull?

Hicken5159d ago

To be honest, probably.

I hate the "artistic integrity" excuse. Wasn't their ORIGINAL ending leaked before the game came out, and this one written in its place? If that's true, whatever "artistic integrity" the ending had was already compromised by their decision to change the ending instead of going with what they had.

And if this current ending is their replacement, and happens to be of such poor quality intentionally )or accidentally, for that matter), then I really don't see a problem with people having issue with it. I do, however, see a problem with Bioware's unwillingness to change the ending they- purportedly- already changed.

There's a difference between an ending being left open to interpretation, and and ending that was done in a poor and vague manner. Given how well everything else in the series wraps up, ME3's ending seems to fall in the latter case. And it seems to argue that, perhaps, their aim was to sell you a more complete ending through DLC(the fact that they're unwilling to ACTUALLY change the ending and instead would to give gamers "clarity" seems to support this).

stragomccloud5158d ago

Do you have any links or sources about the earlier leaked ending? I'm very interested...

stragomccloud5158d ago (Edited 5158d ago )

Great read. I heartily agree.

50°

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.

78d ago Replies(1)
peppeaccardo77d ago

When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!

badz14977d ago

cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla

HyperMoused77d ago

TTK for BF employees needs adjusting

50°

EA makes layoffs at Skate developer Full Circle

The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Profchaos89d ago

The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result

isarai_lee88d ago

It's always so bizarre when studios announce something super early in development under the suggestion of forming the game to player feedback, and then they push against all feedback heading straight for the cliff while everyone is warning them along the way

badboyz0989d ago (Edited 89d ago )

🤣🤣🤣

50°

US Lawmakers Urge Review Of EA Sale

The Congressional Labor Caucus sent a letter to the FTC warning the debt-financed, largely PIF-owned deal could be bad news for workers

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Trilithon123d ago

lol ya think? they're sending all that work to the cheaper labor market as soon as possible. and FYI, that labor market has exploded in the last 5-10 years. They have enough people to replace every single job. But honestly, EA is over filled with useless upper management as it is. You could probably trim 25% of their staff with no real loss in production. They aren't gamers, they're business execs. Just look at how many AI related jobs they're already starting to post. Its also hilarious that PIF owns Battle field 6

lodossrage123d ago (Edited 123d ago )

Wait,

The same congress that attacked Lina Khan when she fought the Microsoft Activision purchase.
The same congress that allowed Disney to buy 90% of Fox
The same congress that allowed Liv Golf to buy the PGA
The same congress that sits back while Paramount tries a hostile takeover despite losing the bid for Warner Bros.

NOW, the suddenly cares about doing what's "right" for works? Yeah, right.

thorstein123d ago

No. There were elections and some of the scum were replaced.

TheColbertinator123d ago

Different elections. Different scum. Same results.

rlow1123d ago

i know its a long shot, but i hope this gets shot down.

ZwVw123d ago

EA now owned by The Saudis and Ubisoft to inevitably be owned by China. In hindsight, once EA and Ubisoft started having their financial woes, they should have pulled a Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco by merging their operations into one.