OXM staff: Look, I get that Skyrim is one of the last bastions of pure single-player entertainment. I was shrug-shouldered when BioShock 2 announced their multiplayer. I was entirely unconvinced by Dead Space 2, and I'm still paint-strippingly dubious about Mass Effect 3's online offering.
But there's one difference - in all those games, the multiplayer was an unnecessary bolt-on. In Skyrim, everything is already in place for an amazing co-op experience. But instead, you have to play alongside these horrible, passive-aggressive - or just plain annoying - AI companions.
A new Skyrim Switch 2 update delivers major visual upgrades, surpassing some console settings, but locks the game to 30fps and introduces noticeable input lag.
That's ridiculous, lol. I'm waiting for the guy that says its too cpu-intensive for the Switch 2. This game is old af and has been released like 17 times.
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim lead designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the game's bucket stealth was an unintended feature of the game.
Lordbound is finally here.
Elder Scrolls or Fallout should never ever have co-op or any sort of online features
Some games just don't need it
Anyway Bethesda have said themselfs that it would cause problems in development. Plus Bethesda can barley do a single player game without bugs getting in the way, imagine what having online bugs would be like
My advice...just let it go. If you want a RPG online game, go play Fable or Two Worlds.
On a side note. Pic unrelated?
I just thought i would leave this here
http://www.skyrimnexus.com/...