
Whats really going on with the MW3 and Metacritic and while we're at it lets break down the whole MW3 vs BF3 problem we having going on today.

EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.
When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!
cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla

Chance Glasco, one of the co-founders of Infinity Ward and creators of the Call of Duty franchise, has claimed that Activision once pressured the studio to include an invasion of Israel by Iran.

The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.
The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result
Oh, boy, this is going to get ugly, yet o' so fun.
The problem I saw was pathetic BF3 fanboys voting down MW3 on Metacritic. Apparently they had ALL three version of modern warfare 3, and thought the game was so unplayable it deserved the score 0. And they also had all THREE version for BF3 and obviously that game deserved a 10 :) Keep in mind every other user review for MW3 and BF3 is like I described.
I love the logic.
the uglier the better! lol
The only thing i dont understand about this article is how did they choose MW3 over BF3 when they clearly believe BF3 has better online play?
I know they gave an answer as to why they chose MW3, however their reasons were because of the online play. So, with that being stated, how is BF3's online play better, but MW3 the better game overall because of its online?