All Channels
Popular
220°

Mass Effect 3 Dev Defends Inclusion Of Multiplayer

360 Magazine: Mass Effect 3′s Executive Producer, Casey Hudson, gives us a behind the scenes glimpse at 2012′s biggest RPG…

Read Full Story >>
360magazine.co.uk
Biglet5273d ago

Well he would, wouldn't he.

DaveX3605273d ago

He's talking about CoD.

LOL

AntoineDcoolette5273d ago

Where did he mention COD? I read it once and dont feel like scanning through it again to find the specific reference.

jimmins5273d ago

I personally defend anything I've made myself with my life. The other day I made amends and am still defending them now.

Nodoze5273d ago

I think it was a mistake to waste dev cycles on multiplayer for Mass Effect. Think of the additional content they could have included instead, and you get the picture.

The first 2 games sold well, and were solid single player experiences...why change that? It seems like an attempt to be something it is not (perhaps trolling for additional new target audience).

I still think this was a serious misstep.

Captain Qwark 95273d ago

i agree. not that some co-op would be bad in ME but i would prefer it to be more rpg like, single player only and those resources for MP used to create another planet or two for me to explore. they could put some jrpg like side missions in the game, like extra bosses for some rare guns or something

Laxman5273d ago

Even though they have stated a seperate team was built purely to create the multiplayer portion of the game while the main/original team simply focused on the story and single-player? Not to mention the team being bigger than ever before too, meaning even more man power being put into the single-player mode than number 2 alone, with Co-op an added bonus which by the way, you dont have to play if you dont want to.

Was Mass Effect 2 not good enough for you?

limewax5273d ago

For me it wasnt. They ruined what was close to being a great game by having 95% of the game end up as a huge set of errands for people so they will join your team.

I want a real story this time, like in the first game

papashango5273d ago

After skyrim they will probably wish they stuck that seperate team on singleplayer. Now I want all my rpg's to be packed with lore and the little details that bring a videogame world to life.

I don't play an rpg for deathmatch or some other stupid mp mode. That's why I have bf3

Solidus187-SCMilk5273d ago (Edited 5273d ago )

I hear dead space is going to be a FPS for the next game.

Im pretty sure that EA is making them do this to try and get sales with both Dead space and ME3.

Too bad that EA is forcing devs to mess with the only two EA games that I even like.

Even if it is good co-op in ME3, I dont want it and wish they just made more SP for me and the ME fans instead of trying to change the game and add things to try and get people who dont even like ME to try it suddenly.

edit- I will be extra angry when they release some garbage multiplayer DLC instead of a good SP DLC like the shadow broker too.

Focus5273d ago

EA Online Pass. That is all this multiplayer is for.

Trainz5273d ago (Edited 5273d ago )

Doesn't matter to me I'm not a bioware fan at all.
And I never buy games new so and I never buy online passes.
That means I will never get the uncharted 3 plat because of 1 trophy and I honestly don't care.
I don't support all this milking and dlc bullsh*t that goes on these days, neither should you.

@Blacktric They did just fine before this gen with pre-owned sales. They make a good game and people will buy it, they make half a game and release the other half as dlc throughout the year then release a bundled edition well I would just wait.
I'm not b*tching about anything, just saying that developers this gen are greedy as f*ck and we are feeding that greed.

Blacktric5273d ago

"And I never buy games new so and I never buy online passes.
That means I will never get the uncharted 3 plat because of 1 trophy and I honestly don't care."

Yeah... or you can wait for a year or wait for christmas sales to get the game for 30-40 bucks and maybe even less than that and support the developer in the process instead of bitching about something that's becoming a norm one way or another?

Dailynch5273d ago

There has to be a better way of encouraging sales than spoiling games with multiplayer that really shouldn't have them.

Show all comments (17)
50°

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.

60d ago Replies(1)
peppeaccardo59d ago

When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!

badz14958d ago

cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla

HyperMoused58d ago

TTK for BF employees needs adjusting

50°

EA makes layoffs at Skate developer Full Circle

The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Profchaos70d ago

The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result

isarai_lee70d ago

It's always so bizarre when studios announce something super early in development under the suggestion of forming the game to player feedback, and then they push against all feedback heading straight for the cliff while everyone is warning them along the way

badboyz0970d ago (Edited 70d ago )

🤣🤣🤣

50°

US Lawmakers Urge Review Of EA Sale

The Congressional Labor Caucus sent a letter to the FTC warning the debt-financed, largely PIF-owned deal could be bad news for workers

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Trilithon104d ago

lol ya think? they're sending all that work to the cheaper labor market as soon as possible. and FYI, that labor market has exploded in the last 5-10 years. They have enough people to replace every single job. But honestly, EA is over filled with useless upper management as it is. You could probably trim 25% of their staff with no real loss in production. They aren't gamers, they're business execs. Just look at how many AI related jobs they're already starting to post. Its also hilarious that PIF owns Battle field 6

lodossrage104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

Wait,

The same congress that attacked Lina Khan when she fought the Microsoft Activision purchase.
The same congress that allowed Disney to buy 90% of Fox
The same congress that allowed Liv Golf to buy the PGA
The same congress that sits back while Paramount tries a hostile takeover despite losing the bid for Warner Bros.

NOW, the suddenly cares about doing what's "right" for works? Yeah, right.

thorstein104d ago

No. There were elections and some of the scum were replaced.

TheColbertinator104d ago

Different elections. Different scum. Same results.

rlow1104d ago

i know its a long shot, but i hope this gets shot down.

ZwVw104d ago

EA now owned by The Saudis and Ubisoft to inevitably be owned by China. In hindsight, once EA and Ubisoft started having their financial woes, they should have pulled a Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco by merging their operations into one.