IncGamers: At its highest level, Galaxy at War is presented as a battle between the allied alien races and the Reapers (you know, those bad guys threatening to wipe out all existence other than their own). At its immediate level however, things play out in a fashion similar to any other game featuring wave based co-operative multiplayer.
EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.
Replies(1)
When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!
cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla
The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.
The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result
It's always so bizarre when studios announce something super early in development under the suggestion of forming the game to player feedback, and then they push against all feedback heading straight for the cliff while everyone is warning them along the way
The Congressional Labor Caucus sent a letter to the FTC warning the debt-financed, largely PIF-owned deal could be bad news for workers
lol ya think? they're sending all that work to the cheaper labor market as soon as possible. and FYI, that labor market has exploded in the last 5-10 years. They have enough people to replace every single job. But honestly, EA is over filled with useless upper management as it is. You could probably trim 25% of their staff with no real loss in production. They aren't gamers, they're business execs. Just look at how many AI related jobs they're already starting to post. Its also hilarious that PIF owns Battle field 6
Wait,
The same congress that attacked Lina Khan when she fought the Microsoft Activision purchase.
The same congress that allowed Disney to buy 90% of Fox
The same congress that allowed Liv Golf to buy the PGA
The same congress that sits back while Paramount tries a hostile takeover despite losing the bid for Warner Bros.
NOW, the suddenly cares about doing what's "right" for works? Yeah, right.
EA now owned by The Saudis and Ubisoft to inevitably be owned by China. In hindsight, once EA and Ubisoft started having their financial woes, they should have pulled a Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco by merging their operations into one.
Not in the slightest. I have no desire to play this whatsoever. Honestly, I would rather (if the game HAD to have multiplayer) just have co-op through the main story where up to 2 other players can join your game and play the other members of your squad and take part in multiplayer conversations like they are doing with The Old Republic. Experiencing and interacting with the story would be 100 times better than some stupid horde mode that's been done to death. I play these games for the story, setting and atmosphere, not for the shooting.
Sure why not. Anything to extend the life of this great franchise is welcomed.
The producer of this game has already stated that the production and inclusion of mp didn't hinder the sp at all.
Anyways, can't wait for this game.
who cares what you want.
Its the developer's choice. I buy what ever they develope as long as the finished product apeals to me when it is done. I don't get involved in telling developers how to make their games - they are the professionals. I just examine the end result and decide rather or not to buy.
How the heck would I know whether or not it is a good idea without seeing the end product?
honestly, a star wars battlefront like game i think could be perfect for mass effect. if only.