That's a dodgy one.... it could be useful if done correctly.... but as we all know it could easily end up being misused and be a pain in the ass.... here's hoping it works well!

Maybe just remove it and let us spawn on squad mates again?

I can see why it is spawn on squad leader only, to help make people play as a team and I am sure in some cases it will push people to do that... but let's be honest... in lot's of cases it will not make a difference!

EDIT: just had a thought... as it is a radio beacon you are putting down to spawn on, one way to stop it being a pain in the ass might be to only be able to put it in certain places where it can get a signal? So like in buildings it will not work ect... then you have to be a bit strategic about where you put it as it can't be hidden up.... but if you have it too out in the open then you will just get spawn killed!

Hmmm, not to sure about this idea. Say you have 4 Recons in a squad, all with radio beacons equipped. If my understanding is correct, those 4 beacons could be set around a team's initial spawn to create 4 mobile spawn points for everyone to spawn on. Voilà! Spawn camping.

I think I'd rather have the spawning system from Bad Company 2. True, when used well it could be a pain to counter, but the idea of having multiple mobile spawn points all over the map sounds like a potential nightmare.

Ok this bothers me a little if it works like a tactical insertion. I can see it being abused.

SO there is actually some benefit to playing Recon now.

Simple solution. The beacon sends out signals that can be heard or seen by players. And it can be destroyed.

Could this be a replacement for the recon's motion balls? I never played the Alpha. Anyone know if motion balls are still in?

To me this does not sound like a tactical insertion but more like the spawn grenades in killzone 2's multiplayer.

So all you gotta do is jump on a jet, parachute down sneak to 10 feet from enemy base, drop the spawn beacon and break out the tent and smore's ? I'm not liking this shit at all. Spawn camping is the main reason I stopped playing Conquest in BC2.

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable

I mean thats all we've wanted since BF4 but they keep doing everything we don't want.