All Channels
Popular
400°

Are Console Ports Killing PC Gaming?

Gaming Irresponsibly's Frank Moricz sites several examples of games that might have done better had they not been ported to consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamingirresponsibly.com
agentxk5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

It's always going to be about appealing to the market, which unfortunately, isn't pc gamers

blitz0x5461d ago

That is unfortunate. PCs started it all in many cases.

kane_13715461d ago

Ummmmm gaming began with consoles.
what are you talking about?

QuodEratDemonstrandm5461d ago

The Magnavox Odyssey in 1972 was the first game console. The PC and DOS didn't happen until 1981.

So that's 9 whole years that Console gamers didn't have PC fanboys looking down on them. (Joking)

Ranshak5461d ago

Well PC gamers did start some of todays popular genres:

First person shooters, Real Time strategy, Massively multiplayer online.

fluffydelusions5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

Gaming definitely became more popular because of consoles. I've been around long enough to have witnessed it happen. Not many people even had a PC in the late mid/late 80's/early 90's but if you were a kid back then you definitely had an NES and of course before that the Atari, Mastersystem, Caleco Vision etc etc. PC became more popular in the 90's with games such as doom and the like. I only knew a handful a of people who had a PC back then and it certainly wasn't for gaming purposes. THAT SAID, the first video game was definitely on PC...
http://inventors.about.com/...

Too_many_games5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

@Ranshak

if the PC created FPS and MMO's and made them how popular they are today, then i would build a time machine and kill the PC lol. the reason videos games suck these days is BECAUSE of First person shooters and MMO's

Bigpappy5461d ago

There will always and has always been a place for both. Gaming has always been the driver for advancements on the PC. But, the consolse have always been there and always lagged behind the PC technology wise.

Porting to console makes sense and is needed for developers who invest a lot of money into game developement and need to recoop that money if PC sales are not high enough. The eco-system has worked for years, and is part of the driver for the evolution of game consoles.

palaeomerus5461d ago

Before the PC and DOS there was the Commodore 64, Apple 2, and TI-994A, and Various 8088 machines that ran CPM in the home.

captain-obvious5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

saying that games on PC dont sell really shows how ignorant some ppl is
the thing is
PC gamers are used to high quality stuff
they are used to alot of content which means alot of time and money to make

while console only gamers
are OK whit very little compared to what PC gamers expect

let alone games on PC drop in prices fast due to popularity of DD

SO

publishers this time like to publish on consoles because they can milk them with DLC and stuff and make sure they work much less than PC versions since console gamres are not as demanding as PC gamers

thats why we have stupid console ports

-Alpha5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

PC gaming is "teh hardcore"

And that is essentially why we have so many watered down ports. Consoles simply home too many simple minded crowds who cannot bother with learning more complicated mechanics

But it's not just watered down console ports we are dealing with. Actual, genuinely "hardcore" console games are getting watered down themselves.

Just look at what happened from SOCOM 2 to SOCOM 4, or Killzone 2 to Killzone 3. Many great features are simply stripped out or made "easier" to use to streamline the product for the masses. It's incredibly unfortunate.

Anarki5461d ago

Hahaha, don't make me laugh. The title should be "Is piracy killing PC gamning?" consoles did nothing to PC gaming, Piracy did that looooong ago.

Veni Vidi Vici5461d ago

If you really want to get technical, computers were made before consoles and one of the first programs made for the first computers were games. So, yes, computers started games. Not consoles.

Theonetheonly5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

well lets just think about it this way PC brought about the polygon. :)

oh and without nvidia and ati consoles would still be in the stone age, the gpu market on pc is what makes the awesome graphics leaps on consoles possible.

evrfighter5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

ive been saying this for years.

Henry Ford stuck to the same Model T for over a decade while the competition began to innovate. By the time he realized that sticking to the same formula wouldn't work it was too late. They have played 2nd fiddle to Chevy since.

Most 3rd party devs are now just barely seeing that developing for pc as lead is the smartest decision they can make. We all saw what happened to Crytek when they stuck with that old model T.

They basically came crawling back to pc gamers apologizing and begging us to get them out of that hole they stuck themselves in.

XRider5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

People been saying PC is dead since the release of PS3 and 360. Accept for a couple games like Red Dead, most games are also on PC. PC is still here and still the superior platform. Hell, most console devs use PC to make the games then port them over to console.

MaxXAttaxX5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

No you fool. "Computer" does not necessarily mean "PC".
PC and DOS did NOT exist in the 1950s.

Did you know that consoles are ALSO COMPUTERS?
Consoles are computer systems designed specifically for gaming.

PC gaming as we know it did not start until a decade after the first videogame console and other systems.

vickers5005460d ago

"since console gamres are not as demanding as PC gamers"

Graphics don't matter as much to console gamers as much as it matters to you PC gamers. We like to have fun with the actual game, and while graphics do play a part in our enjoyment of gaming, it's not a very big one.

Almost every comment I read from PC gamers make it seem like they are only interested in the tech, rather than the games. Obviously that's not every PC gamer, but those of you who tout "tech" as a reason for PC gaming being superior to consoles make it seem that way.

radphil5460d ago

I find it funny no one referenced to the "first" electronic game being made from radar equipment.

Dee_915460d ago

yay more pc vs console arguments

AKS5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

@Vickers500

"Graphics don't matter as much to console gamers as much as it matters to you PC gamers. We like to have fun with the actual game, and while graphics do play a part in our enjoyment of gaming, it's not a very big one."

Is that a fact? Well, I guess I must have misinterpreted quite a few things in those Red Dead, Mafia II, Bioshock, GTIV, ect. PS3 versus 360 threads in which PS3 and 360 gamers argued about pixelated grass or the pixelation about the back of a dead Big Daddy for 10 pages each. Or the endless wars over exclusives. I tried to play peacemaker in some of those threads, stating they really look pretty similar, and I was told I didn't know what I was talking about and given a bunch of disagrees.

I also am willing to bet that when the next generation of Playstation and Xbox are released that graphics will suddenly become very important again.

I game on 50/50 on PC/PS3 most of the time, and I'm pretty sure I am more tolerant of low end graphics than most of you. I started gaming with the Atari 2600 and still enjoy retro games of the early generations as well. I had a great time in the Genesis/SNES generation in particular. I think I've played through the Streets of Rage 2 re-release on PSN about 5 times already. LOL.

But I also enjoy the high end stuff on my PC, as well as the hobby of just putting together and improving my rig. People that take the time to learn about putting hardware together and how it works aren't going to get pulled into the silly "subHD" debates or expect something like Battlefield 3 to run in 1080p/ 60fps on a 6 year old machine. It wouldn't hurt some of those trashing PC gaming to learn a bit more about it and about what factors are involved in making a game run and look the way it does. Making a game in 1080p isn't as simple as just switching on the 1080p option, and there are a number of other factors and trade-offs that can make it look much better than increasing the resolution. That's why the best console developers often do this. They know what they are doing and how to make a game run well and look the best it can.

lil Titan5460d ago

@kane_1371 & @fluffydelusions gaming became popular because of "Arcades" not PC nor consoles or you can say Mario, gaming started on the PC was introduced as a console because PC gaming just like it is now is expensive and father didnt want Jr playing on his work machine, consoles only came out because the demand of having the experience of a arcade at home was wanted its really funny since almost all our tech started out from the army as simulators theres more to gaming history but thats brief lesson

STONEY45460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

"Graphics don't matter as much to console gamers as much as it matters to you PC gamers. We like to have fun with the actual game, and while graphics do play a part in our enjoyment of gaming, it's not a very big one."

That's definitely why 99% of the time, the most played game on Steam is Counterstrike Source. Those graphics man...

stu8885460d ago

The PS1 and N64 started this mass market gaming.

Games like Mario 64 and the original Tomb Raider started it, not PCs.

(exception of Doom)

pixelsword5460d ago

No, stealing games are killing PC gaming.

x5exotic5460d ago

@Ranshak "Well PC gamers did start some of todays popular genres:

First person shooters, Real Time strategy, Massively multiplayer online. "
the worst genres ever that are ruining gaming altogether

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 5460d ago
BeastlyRig5461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

Unless it's bf3, Valve or Blizzard game of course..

I like the fact that pc has the best shooters (like Red Orchestra 2 or Arma3) that are not mainstream & famous! That's why they are still good games I suppose..

Cod went from army game to run and gun arcade.. Dice is sticking to pc & not making it a mass appeal game for casuals..

Not that arcade shooters are bad or anything.

But I do think pc will be the last breed of what we call hardcore gaming..

pc bring new and innovative games while console are victims of trends.

If it wasn't for Dice everyone would have only cod as a option later this year!

blitz0x5461d ago

How are you going to spend the time to comment on an article you reported as lame?

Note the irony in the last thing you approved:
http://n4g.com/news/794145/...

Hanif-8765461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

It might not be killing PC gaming but they are getting some shabby ports though!

iamgoatman5461d ago

^ This!

It's got to the point now that I never buy games that I know to be console ports straight away new, I always wait a month or two to see how a title runs and if there isn't any underlying problems that could potentially appear on my hardware. If there is then I'll make sure I get it used sometime later for next to nothing if at all, but if a developer has put the effort in then I'll make sure I buy it new. I've never pirated a game.

The lazy devs out there looking for a quick cash grab don't deserve my money. I'd say standards for a PC game are higher than a console game, if the game isn't up to scratch it will flop hard. Theres as much opportunity to make money as console gaming, just as long as you don't treat us like chumps.

hiredhelp5460d ago

for a while now alot devs are concertrating more on consoles. And there for have let the pc market slide thats why when we get a pc game thats also on consoles. youll find alot of them have been used on a low to mid end pc market so it cant be adpated for consoles.
this has let the pc gamers in my eyes down for a long time. cos while the devs step back concerntrate on titles for the consoles. you have
Intel and AMD, pushing there hardware wars apon us so we go out upgrade. but end of the day were not getting them used to full potential specially top end video cards.

But even thoe i feel the tide is changing now back to PC we will always have a better loking game if you have a mid range to top range video card. cos even if the devs dont utilize the pc powers. the video cards do that for us.

however i see some here debating the old chicken and the egg thing witch come first. well as we know about games they need a pc to create them on. from my history i beleave the oc was the first. but for the mass market the best pc game in the 80's early 90's to me must be the amiga the first 16 bit' (saves) expandable ram.

personally if i could go back intime to my old C64 HELL EVEN THE OLD SEGA OR NES. i would cos had more enjoyment less hasel then today its all about money today not about games.

MostJadedGamer5461d ago

The industry will be better for everybody when PC gaming is dead.

STONEY45461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

And console advancement will slow to a crawl if that happens. Nvidia, AMD, and Intel are the sole reason consoles look the way they do today. PC gamers give those companies a reason to constantly improve hardware. Consoles would probably be looking like PS2s right now.

Whether you like it or not, consoles need PC gaming.

Veni Vidi Vici5461d ago

You are incredibly ignorant if you truly believe that. Not only is the PC the sole reason the technology advances the way it does but many of the innovations and creativity in games are because of the mod community.

Not to mention the fact that you can use a mouse and keyboard. I'm sorry. I can't stand playing FPS's with a shitty controller that requires the game to program aim assist in it. I refuse to play FPS's on consoles because their controls are so horrible.

Jonah_Reese5460d ago

Dude that was just stupid to say.

Ravenor5460d ago

As a Console and PC gamer, no..just you're wrong.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5460d ago
DarkBlood5460d ago

well there are more console gamers then there are pc gamers which u know as well as i do that not everyone else is going to spend the bucks to big a pc rig.

espically familys who likely cant just do that for each individual in the group so as i see it in my eyes makes the consoles more popular in that sense

Rettom5460d ago

You can easily buy a 300-400$ PC that plays way better than consoles. Modding FTW!

5460d ago Replies(5)
Legion5460d ago

It was PC hardware that killed the PC Gaming. Basically the PCs have too many specs to deal with I remember having to deal with so many games that only worked with specific graphics cards and such.

Always having to modify my system to be able to play the latest games. Consoles allowed you to just enjoy the game by putting a disk in a tray. Not worrying about if my graphics card, memory or latest software was updated enough to play the next games.

Ravenor5460d ago (Edited 5460d ago )

Yeah, in the late 90's. Thinhs are different now, beyond minor differences like Physx and different forms of AA you'll find no difference between AMD or Nvidia cards. Unless someone dropped the ball driver wise, which is always unfortunate.

PC gaming really isn't as hard as it used to be, building and maintaining PC's is almost as easy as a console.

Legion5460d ago

PC gaming didn't just recently die. As for specs and keeping up with them. Still not much difference in yesterday and today. New PC hardware capabilities means that developers attempt to create the best they can with the new specs and if your system is not up to par then you might as well own a console.

Even DirectX features cause pains in capabilities. Something new each day it seams with the PC. Which is good if you want to keep up with it. But the market doesn't sell to those few who like to play the upgrade game.

"PC gaming really isn't as hard as it used to be, building and maintaining PC's is almost as easy as a console." Really??? Maintaining a console... possibly having to wait for an automatic update if you go online. Maintaining a PC... numerous firmware and driver updates, compatability issues with specs and such. Having an open system that when you instal one program it tends to conflict with other software. It can be a nightmare depending on what you use your PC for... and how PC savy you are. The modern gamer doesn't care to learn how to change out a graphics card or even update all their drivers.

PC games have minimum specs on their boxes for a reason. Some machines just can't live up to those specs and most can't live up to ideal specs.

Ranshak5460d ago

@legion

Build it right and it will last just as long as a console.

Games these days are designed with 5-6year old hardware (console). Any PC which was more powerful then a console 5-6years back still will be beating console at games today.

8800gtx from 5 years back still beats consoles in just about every game. Like i said build it right there will be no reason to upgrade for a very long time.

SuicideShaun5460d ago

I believe we call that being a "simpleton".

Legion5460d ago

@Ranshak

To build it right you will pay more then 2 console generations. And still not have the number of good games available for the consoles. And you will STILL have to deal with regular driver and software updates... and software conflicts.

@SuicideShaun

I am assuming that you are referring to console owners as simpletons? I just have to say that console owners have great games to play and the entire family is enjoying the experience in their living room with thir wide screen HD setup. Majority of PC gamers still have their system in their bedroom so they can play games in between jerking off to porn on the internet.

My computer is used for graphics and game developement only. And though it is very capable it still has a few tweaks that prevent it from playing some games at their highest level. I still play my games on consoles. (though I used to be a huge computer gamer) but these days the computer just doesn't have the games that the consoles have... and I don't play farmville and WOW... which is the majority of ALL computer gamers.

reynod5460d ago

@legion

Cost me about 800usd to make a PC with a 8800GTX when PS3 launched (PS3 was 600usd at launch, could never do everything a PC can), PS3 games cost alot more then PC versions. Check out the deals on Steam and D2D, PC is easily cheaper and superior in the long run.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5460d ago
FFXNo15460d ago Show
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5460d ago
Agent-865461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

Hopefully more developers will follow DICE's path with BF3: don't skimp on the PC version just because consoles can't handle it. Maybe, as more console gamers see the differences, they'll either demand new consoles or possibly switch over to PC gaming which has been having a renaissance of late.

Either way would be good for PC gamers: 1) new consoles wouldn't hold back PC games as much as they are now, or 2) having new PC gamers would increase that market and developers would give them more attention. Since MS and Sony want to drag the current console cycle out even longer, I guess I'll have to hope for #2 and PC gets more gamers wanting a better experience.

Ravenor5460d ago

Games like RO2 and Arma 3 show that the PC and bigger/better hardware can create game worlds and situations simply impossible on the consoles.

Jacobite5461d ago

A good dev should always push a platform to its best abilities to show what they can do, not skimp. I would rather wait for the PC version than get a console port but thats me for fps & rpg's anyway, I prefer racing and platformers on consoles.

Agent-865461d ago (Edited 5461d ago )

I have a pretty similar outlook, but have slightly different tastes. I have my PC for FPS and RTS games and a PS3 for the sports, racing and action/adventure games (like RDR or UC2). I think it's a great gaming combo to have a PC and a console: I don't miss out on too many games.

Raf1k15461d ago

I agree that they should push each platform but then you'd get even more whining on the other side of every fence just because there are some differences. Some people just don't get that different platforms have different strenghts and weaknesses.

STONEY45461d ago

I 'm only using my PS3 for exclusives right now. I use a controller for any games on PC that don't too good on m/kb (some platformers, side scrollers, shoot-em-ups like Geometry Wars).

For racers, 60 fps is a big thing for me, as is visibility in the distance where a higher resolution helps, plus I have a wheel, so PC is the way for me.

RedDeadLB5461d ago

I don't have a problem with multiplatform games when it comes to graphics, but I do have a problem with the lousy performance PC games have lately, because they are console ports.

iamgoatman5461d ago

Some games do seem to be requiring more and more powerful hardware without an increase in graphics quality, or very little increases which does annoy me. It's just that because standard specs for gaming PC's are always increasing a developer obviously doesn't feel the need to optimise the game for lower hardware, so we end up with a game that used to run fine on what could be considered low end hardware now having say a sequel with very little improvement in overall IQ requiring mid range hardware.

Of course this isn't always true as some games actually become easier to run with the next installment, like Mass Effect 2, the first ME ran like shit and still does whereas ME2 runs beautifully for the most part, pretty much down to the fact that Demiurge ported the original and didn't do a great job whereas Bioware did the second themselves and it turned out good.

RedDeadLB5461d ago

Of course, I agree. Take a look at Mafia 2 and GTA4. Mafia 2 looks better than GTA4 and it runs far more smoothly.

Optimization is key, something that developers today overlook quite easily.

Bad Company 2 is also another example of bad optimization. The game ran butter smooth on my PS3, but on my PC it just starts to drop frames from 60 to 20-30fps for no apparent reason behind it, there's nothing going on on the screen.

Battlefield 3 is coming, and is said to have system requirements similar to BC2, but it looks 10x better. Why? Because it's optimized for PCs.

Darkfocus5460d ago

Bad company 2 had superb optimization. You just need a quad core to run it well.

Ravenor5460d ago

I also experience no problem with BC2 on the PC, doesn't matter which video card.

Spinal5461d ago

PC Gaming is fine move on.

Show all comments (143)
40°

Dragon Age Lead Says Including World State Reactivity Felt Like It Was "Irrelevant Or Not Enough"

Dragon Age 2 set the precedent that the series would always carry our choices over, but was it worth it?

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
TheColbertinator89d ago

If the choices won't matter, why bother? Bioware works so hard at giving meaningful choices but rarely if ever carrying out the impact of such choices to the end.

70°

Skyrim Switch 2 Update Boosts Visuals, But Performance Falls Short

A new Skyrim Switch 2 update delivers major visual upgrades, surpassing some console settings, but locks the game to 30fps and introduces noticeable input lag.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gigoran8178d ago

they can't get a 14 year old game to run smoothly?

jjb1981178d ago

That's ridiculous, lol. I'm waiting for the guy that says its too cpu-intensive for the Switch 2. This game is old af and has been released like 17 times.

60°

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim’s iconic bucket-head stealth was a complete surprise on launch

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim lead designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the game's bucket stealth was an unintended feature of the game.