All Channels
Popular
160°

Maybe I’m Just Being Cynical: Online Access Codes

EA shut servers down, this much we know. EA have now also decided it’s a good idea to require you to have the code from your brand new copy of whichever game you’ve picked up to access the online multi-player side of things, or if you’ve bought pre-owned to then buy access to the online multi-player. Put these together and they spell big money for EA at the expense of us gamers. Now i’m not naive enough to think that a company like EA loses a minute’s sleep over hitting gamers square in the pocket, after all business is business and money talks right. EA are a business and of course they’re going to want to make as big a profit as is humanly possible from every release. It’s just a shame they feel that us gamers aren’t quite spending enough of our hard earned cash as it is or feel we’re all so well off we can afford to buy every rehashed sports title full price.

Read Full Story >>
wiredcontroller.com
Nawabi5499d ago

i see more and more companies following EA in future

DeeZee5499d ago

I agree with author, I don't see the point in online access codes. It makes me not want to play/buy the game.

omi25p5499d ago

i actually agree with online access codes, When you buy a preowned game the company makes no money off of that game, For singleplayer this is no big deal because the company has made its sale on that game and cant really make much more of a profit from it.

But preowned multiplayer game is different, because the player will be accessing the servers provided by the developer and the servers cost money to run. So preowned Multiplayer game would end up costing the company a money with no profit, which is bad from a business point of view.

So by having to buy a online access code would mean they are making a profit off running the servers.

thor5499d ago

On the other hand this may severely limit the number of players online. People buy second-hand games and sell games they've bought because they don't have enough money to pay for the full game, or a new game they want. Now they'll just have to save up and they'll probably end up skipping some of EA's games if they know they can't afford to play online.

Scenarist5499d ago

If I buy a game used and the price to play it online makes the total price close to a retail copy then i will result to doing what is said below...
if its a minimal fee then i may or may not pay.
_____________________________ _______________

If I aquire a game second hand ie: someone gives it to me free , I buy it used ,or rent it from gamefly .. I dont want to add any money on top of it and therefor I will result to doing stupid shit because I am cheap and poor ( cost of living /salary) like opening up games in stores and writing down or taking the codes like I used to do serial numbers for pc games to play online after i downloaded them back in the day (for games that didnt have cracked servers)..

I say too much , too much of the time

ManOnFire5499d ago

The game you are talking about has alreay been sold for the full retail price and gives the person the ability to play online so when that game is sold its not like the original buyer can still play it online right ? So it is not creating higher volume on the servers than what they would expect based on sales numbers. The number of copies sold is still the installed base no matter how many times the game is sold used. Something to think about.

xGet_In_There5499d ago

@ Scenarist

GameStop is known for this. I for one take ALL manuals and codes out of the games before I put them on the floor, but that's just one of thousands of employees. Also if I can recall correctly EA gives you a 7 day online trial and then you can enter/redeem a code after it's over. This is good for trophy/achievement hunters because some of EA's sports games are easy online ones. I did it with Madden and Tiger Woods.

cogniveritas5499d ago

Okay, there are never a greater number of players on an online server than the number of discs sold at retail, in addition to the number of digital copies sold. So it costs the developers nothing extra to maintain since the gamer who sold their used game will no longer be playing that game online.

It's just about profit, that's all. I have to be fair minded because I believe in the Free Market where gamers have the right to sell their used games. But that also forces me to support the right of Developers to include online access codes if the market allows it, which it has.

Developers have a right to earn money, consumers have a right to save money. If all is legal and does not obstruct the free market, then there is no foul.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5499d ago
cochise3135499d ago (Edited 5499d ago )

I don't like online access codes. No other companies does it besides greedy ones. first party games (MS and Sony) never do this so why should third party ones? Like i see it; the company has made money off of the initial sale. This practice doesn't increase sales; people buy used games for a reason. Some people can't afford to pay 60 bucks for a new game and have to spend their money wisely. I think this is in bad taste. Once you buy the game, it drops in value because of the lack of online play.

Show all comments (12)
50°

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.

76d ago Replies(1)
peppeaccardo75d ago

When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!

badz14975d ago

cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla

HyperMoused75d ago

TTK for BF employees needs adjusting

50°

EA makes layoffs at Skate developer Full Circle

The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Profchaos87d ago

The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result

isarai_lee87d ago

It's always so bizarre when studios announce something super early in development under the suggestion of forming the game to player feedback, and then they push against all feedback heading straight for the cliff while everyone is warning them along the way

badboyz0987d ago (Edited 87d ago )

🤣🤣🤣

50°

US Lawmakers Urge Review Of EA Sale

The Congressional Labor Caucus sent a letter to the FTC warning the debt-financed, largely PIF-owned deal could be bad news for workers

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Trilithon121d ago

lol ya think? they're sending all that work to the cheaper labor market as soon as possible. and FYI, that labor market has exploded in the last 5-10 years. They have enough people to replace every single job. But honestly, EA is over filled with useless upper management as it is. You could probably trim 25% of their staff with no real loss in production. They aren't gamers, they're business execs. Just look at how many AI related jobs they're already starting to post. Its also hilarious that PIF owns Battle field 6

lodossrage121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

Wait,

The same congress that attacked Lina Khan when she fought the Microsoft Activision purchase.
The same congress that allowed Disney to buy 90% of Fox
The same congress that allowed Liv Golf to buy the PGA
The same congress that sits back while Paramount tries a hostile takeover despite losing the bid for Warner Bros.

NOW, the suddenly cares about doing what's "right" for works? Yeah, right.

thorstein121d ago

No. There were elections and some of the scum were replaced.

TheColbertinator121d ago

Different elections. Different scum. Same results.

rlow1121d ago

i know its a long shot, but i hope this gets shot down.

ZwVw121d ago

EA now owned by The Saudis and Ubisoft to inevitably be owned by China. In hindsight, once EA and Ubisoft started having their financial woes, they should have pulled a Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco by merging their operations into one.