80°

Crysis 2 Performance Preview

Crysis 2 is one of the year's most anticipated PC games. Considering that the original game to this very day can put a mid-range machine to crawl we were keen to preview how the game runs on current generation graphics cards.

Read Full Story >>
techspot.com
xtremegamerage5537d ago

Textures are nothing special.
Shaders are nice
Lighting is nice.
Particle system is nice in places.

It will look good and bad on Console.

Will look like a different game on PC.

AKS5536d ago

I'm gettting it for PC as well, but I didn't think it looked bad in the 360 beta for a console game. It was pretty fun and ran reasonably well, actually.

Kalipekona5536d ago

"textures are nothing special"

I don't know where you are pulling that from. The article certainly doesn't say that. I have seen the game running and the textures are very good.

"Although we have only tested an early "beta" version of Crysis 2, we aim to purchase and re-test the full version next March 22nd as the results and the game itself look stunning.

We cannot say with certainty that the performance we've seen today will align with what we find in roughly a month’s time, but we can tell the graphics we saw were amazingly detailed and performance output from current generation GPUs was quite satisfactory."

5536d ago Replies(3)
Theo11305536d ago

On topic, The game runs 60+fps on medium Dx9, but high drops down to around 30fps. But this is just a beta, and not even Dx11. One of the last things devs work on optimization, so I would say to not look at the leaked beta as any indication of what it run like.

evrfighter5536d ago

Surely you aren't talking about the pc....how it runs on your pc is your own hardware to blame.

If your only getting 60 and 30 fps. Disable vsync.

SuicideShaun5536d ago

Directx should point out that he is talking about pc. And yes the beta does only have dx9. With dx11 enabled the game will be like a whole new world.

Theo11305536d ago

I would, but I don't know the command, no option in the menu. And my pc is fine, it should be able to run this game without a problem, the problem is optimization. Especially when I'm have an i7 920 @3.8, and a 470 gtx

AKS5536d ago

@Theo1130

That obviously isn't the final version, so I'm not surprised it isn't well optimized.

Sarcasm5536d ago

Supposedly some are saying that the "leaked" build is limited to only medium settings despite it saying "Hardcore" which is presumably the highest settings.

I say let's just wait for the full release to make any real judgements.

despair5536d ago

Hardcore is not even the highest setting, at least not by the previous warhead standards, there is a level called Enthusiast which is higher than Hardcore.

Plus it doesn't seem like the "leaked" version is running on the highest settings either as you said even on Hardcore, its still all DX9 not DX11 which should result in some insane graphics. Funny thing is even with the limited settings the game looks incredible. I really am getting excited for this game now.

Kakkoii5535d ago (Edited 5535d ago )

edit: bugged comment system -_-

Kakkoii5535d ago

That doesn't seem right. I have an i7 920/930 also, and only at 3.3ghz. And 2x GTX 460's. But I'm only playing the game in single GPU mode since there's no SLI profile for it yet.

At very high settings (you have to set it to sys_spec=4 in the system.cfg to get that high). I keep a steady 60FPS.

the optimization is great, it must be something wrong with your computer. Are you using the absolute newest drivers? Do a clean install of them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5535d ago
MARKUS_MAX1MUS5536d ago

Clearly neomatrix got rocked on the crysis beta on xbox, takes you to use your brain, COD running sprinting around like a dumbass doesnt work sir.

Of course you can only compare it to the only game you know. Comparisons limit your ability to think freely, just remember that.

the game will look good on xbox which im getting because my community is on there and im getting it on PC for the MOD tools cause they are awesome fun.

Tyre5535d ago (Edited 5535d ago )

well said Markus.... people that compare Crysis 2 to CoD obviously have never played Crysis...Crysis is a whole new playground and i love that console games have this addition thanks to Crytek!

Kakkoii5535d ago (Edited 5535d ago )

You have to use your brain well in COD too if you actually want to keep a good KD ratio while also placing within the top 3. If all you want to do is get kills, then yeah you can just run around like a fool.

FPS games really need to start making the KD ratio the determining factor, not the amount of kills. Especially in team deathmatch.. If you died more times than you killed people, you weren't a help to the team at all, yet you could still somehow get placed as number 1 merely for having the most kills lol.

No FPS games is easy. People saying it's so easy to kill in COD tend to forget that goes both ways. If it's easy to kill people, then it's easy to get killed. So stop hating on one FPS or another just because you don't enjoy it. (And by "you" I'm talking in general.)

MARKUS_MAX1MUS5535d ago

my point being this gave involves using your brain on a far higher level than COD and even to do well in COD you dont need to be particulary smart, you just need a decent aim and aim assist works its magic.

Ninjamonkey825536d ago

Well looks like ill be upgrading this 460gtx 1gb :/

Kakkoii5535d ago

Why? I'm playing the game with a 1GB GTX 460 and I get a steady 60FPS on very high settings in the game.

40°

Veteran artist behind Mass Effect, Halo, and Overwatch 2 weighs in on Nvidia DLSS 5

Darryl Linington from Notebookchect.net writes, "The backlash around Nvidia’s AI push and DLSS 5 has opened a broader question in game development. Beyond performance and image quality, veteran artists are now weighing what AI-driven rendering means for authorship and visual control. If a system can add or reinterpret detail after the fact, the issue is no longer just technical. It becomes a question of how much of the final image still belongs to the people who built it."

Read Full Story >>
notebookcheck.net
50°

NVIDIA DLSS 4.5 Frame Gen 5x & 6x Come to RTX 50 Series GPUs + Dynamic Multi Frame Gen

The latest GeForce driver introduces DLSS 4.5 Multi Frame Generation 5x and 6x alongside Dynamic Multi Frame Generation to RTX 50-series GPUs. The former increases the number of interpolated frames to 4 and 5 (between every two rendered frames), further reducing reliance on the CPU.

Read Full Story >>
pcoptimizedsettings.com
blacktiger14d ago

Big corp bowing down to another big corp is nothing more than helping each other. But try any games it doesn't work

Smellsforfree14d ago

I don't mind frame gen but only use it if I'm already >70fps without it. It is kinda nice but if I see any visual artifacts I will turn it off. Whenever I'm playing games on my 120Hz LG C3 I will almost never use it because frame rates >120fps look really bad. I think spatial super sampling is a far more interesting and beneficial tech than frame gen. Boosting 30fps to 60fps with framegen is just garbage.

SimpleDad13d ago

Tvs were doing this 15 years ago with their telenovela effect... Idk how anyone can play with this on.

There is definitely input lag there and artifacts.

CornholioX13d ago

It's commercial how they show it. Typical any company does that.

Goodguy0113d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Frame gen just has too much latency and visual glitches for me, don't think I can ever use it for most games. I'd compare with it on and off and it's a world of difference in the feel. I need the very least input lag in my gaming. Companies should rely on actual optimization. As for potato hardware, I suppose it could have it's use.

40°

Is the AI Push in AAA Gaming Giving Indie Developers A Golden Ticket?

WTMG's Jordan Hawes: "With the advent of NVIDIA's DLSS 5 tools, and the whole debacle surrounding AI usage in AAA gaming, is this new push an opportunity for smaller studios to showcase they are the ones vouching for artistic integrity in the gaming industry?"

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
Obelisk9224d ago

They already are. Indie studios are the only developers that constantly strive to publish innovative and experimental experiences. There has been little to no art in AAA gaming, with just a few exceptions.

Yi-Long24d ago

Indie-studios have been showcasing their creative superiority and bravery over AAA-studios/releases for a while now.

Personally. I have zero interest in AI slop in any of my entertainment, so regardless of what Sony, Ubisoft, MS, EA, etc believe the future is, I'm just not gonna touch any of that stuff.

blacktiger24d ago

Everything you said but for me MS is always the problem.

isarai_lee24d ago

One more thing in a long list of things that already give indie Games an advantage

Miacosa24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

In reality a dev having a simplistic tech statck does not really impact the end user experience. If the game is good and worth playing is what matters. In other words some cooks make care if 2 or 3 eggs were used to make a cake but the person eating it doesn't. And in the case of DLSS 5 the chef is soley responsible for the recipe and how its mixed together.