Thank yo EA!! don't follow the gimmicks!! The less waggle & jump over the couch to shoot enemies fps's the better!!!

killzone 3,mag,socom are move optional

I guarentee you only 1 percent of real players will use it

I can imagine a move FPS game but i can't imagine a Kinect FPS game
I mean how are you suppose to move with no controller? Do you run in one spot? Would be rather awkward

This article should be only about Kinect because you don't need to Imagine Move FPS it's real.

Why is EA including Move in this when their are several FPS already in existence for the Move? 'Hard to imagine controllerless Kinect FPS'. Fixed.

from the 2009 E3 trailers i said that Fps with kinect is impossible .. NObody suceeded, and probably nobody will with the current state of kinect

But,but,but! Kinect is the future of video games.
Lol. PEW, PEW, PEW ;)
BTW: @Xfanboy what about "you are the controller" so,why you want to compliment the controller in Kinect FPS?

EA doesn't care about move,you might get Wii ports though

"It's really hard to imagine that I'm going to play a future edition of Medal of Honor, or Call of Duty, or Battlefield, hiding behind my couch, making a gun out of my finger. I've tried driving with gesture-based controls; I don't really like it."

Did no one here read the article? I mean that not exactly what he said, just read this quote. Nowhere did he say it can't happen or won't happen, just that he won't be using it.

Obviously it's not only possible, but a reality with the Move (see FPS Killzone 3 hitting next month, and TPS Socom coming in Spring).

For the Kinect I can understand the problem. Without a controller, it's simply mind boggling to comprehend how a player would control every aspect that the average gun-toting antagonist in a FPS would need. Outside of adding in a controller and completely defeating the entire purpose for Kinect, it's just too hard to imagine.

I can't, for a second, believe Riccitello to be this ignorant that he'd make such comments when the control is a reality...at least on one platform.

Driving without a controller is retarded. The only controller replacement for better immersion in a racing game is a wheel and pedals. Driving without a controller you don't have force feedback, and are limited to 270 degrees of rotation.

@doG beLIEfs just watched your KZ3 Move Demo and most of the time he uses the controls or has he calls them navigation control, like I said it's a bolt on not true FPS motion control, it's an illusion.

They're not hard to imagine, they're just pointless. The whole idea of motion controls should be to improve games that are crap with a controller. FPS games are fine with a controller, so we don't need motion controls at all.

so to make kinect not look so bad they lumped in move?

move had an fps game support at launch, actually prior to launch with the MAG update. And killzone 3, Modern Combat and Socom 4 have all been seen using move.

let the disagrees begin...

Sony should cover the dev costs for Move implementation for all AAA games to show how useful Move can be in traditional games.

I'd love a Move option BFBC3 or the next COD.

I Have to agree, FPS is not ideal for movement controllers, especially the kinect since the strength is in using the whole body and not pointing a handheld item. This is more than adequately controlled with a gamepad or mouse/keyboard.

On the other hand some full contact fighting games that incorporate martial arts and melee weapons etc (ie full body motions) will be cool when they get them right.