Approvals 10/3 ▼
Chug (2) - 5493d ago Cancel
-Mezzo- (4) - 5493d ago Cancel
dkblackhawk50 (2) - 5493d ago Cancel
Jrlibrarian (1) - 5493d ago Cancel
curtis394 (1) - 5493d ago Cancel
300°

E4G: What if Infinity Ward and Treyarch worked together?

E4G: We all know that this will not happen but if it did, just imagine the possibilities. Finally there could be a perfect Call of Duty game that has great graphics and an amazing online multiplayer to go with it.

Read Full Story >>
everythingforgamers.info
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong story type
Should be Article
Columbo5493d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5493d ago
dkblackhawk505493d ago

Hehe love that image, but yeah it would be a great call of duty game.

LoaMcLoa5493d ago

It would've probably be the buggiest game in the world

nikkisixx25493d ago

Ignorance is not bliss, at least not on N4G

IW and Treyarch worked together on MW2.

Their was an interview with the CEO of activision (i think... it may have been the head of IW tho). And they said Treyarch didnt get the credit they deserved for the work on MW2.

So yeah, them working together would make a shitty game, just look at MW2.

Dave13515493d ago

actually it would have awesome graphics thanks to IW. and really balanced thanks to treyarch

HappyGaming5493d ago (Edited 5493d ago )

Hey what if IW Treyarch Bungie Naughty Daawg Santa Monica Epic Polyphony Digital Media Molecule and Guerilla Games all worked together on a $500 million budget?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5493d ago
BiggCMan5493d ago

If they worked together under a new publisher that isn't run by such a dick, then I think a good game would be possible. A publisher that allows freedom for the developers, lets them have lots of time to iron things out, and make the game with passion.

mfwahwah5493d ago

IW doesn't want to work with Treyarch. Activision tried to get them to play nice, and now there's a whole lawsuit going on over it...

xtremexx5493d ago

great content and lightning fast patches

MariaHelFutura5493d ago

It wouldn`t make much difference, they basically remake the same game. Over and Over.

But.....people keep buying it w/ a brain full of butterflies.

FrankMcSpank5493d ago (Edited 5493d ago )

They wouldn't be working on two games at once. So we would get a COD every other year, which would make me happy. Every year it is the same thing. It's getting stale.

@Maria
Oh God don't say that!

MariaHelFutura5493d ago

No.NO. You would get a COD every 6 months. "Ballin Bobby" would make sure of that.

HappyGaming5493d ago (Edited 5493d ago )

The game would release with 2 maps and every month another 2 maps would be available as DLC for just $15... and when the new maps came out the old maps would purposefully put you in empty rooms to make you think that everyone is playing the new maps.

Maybe I should work for Activision :D
/s

CovertGunman5493d ago

Seems like it could be interesting, but doubt it would actually happen.

curtis3945493d ago

It wouldn't happen because Infinity Ward is hated by Activision. End of Story

MGRogue20175493d ago (Edited 5493d ago )

Yes, Join them together.

Treyarch's Zombies

+

Infinity Ward's Map/Level design & Storyline ideas

=

One Awesome CoD Game.. Instead of two rehashed & recycled ones..

SoSLy5493d ago

Garbage + Garbage = Garbage? even if you polish garbage, its still garbage. And Bobby Kotick will make sure it will be a garbage Cod which will come out every year to make him stacks of money. doesnt matter if its garbage.

Show all comments (40)
50°

Kotick claims lawsuit objecting to MS-Activision deal was "tied to Embracer's desire to boost sales"

Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 11h ago
Changed: title
Changed: credit url
OpenGL1d 9h ago

Yeah, the Microsoft deal has DEFINITELY worked out for everyone.

galgor1d 6h ago

Can this mother fucker just get lost already

PRIMORDUS1d 5h ago

He belongs in here ⚰️, hopefully sooner than later.

MrDead13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.

160°

Microsoft needs to listen or risk irreparable harm to Call of Duty

Windows Central: "The money may keep rolling in, but Microsoft is the custodian of one of the biggest selling video game series in history. If something doesn't change, I fear we'll reach a breaking point and irreparable damage will have been done."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community51d ago
StoneTitan51d ago

Because ms is so good at managing studios, surely they will get it right

:P

franwex51d ago

In my view, they should probably merge MP with Warzone and essentially make it free to play like Halo Infinite. The campaign/zombies mode can be $30 yearly DLC. I know this would be insanity as most COD players essentially pay the full price of the game simply for the MP. However-with a shrinking player base they may have to consider it. Making it free would bring in a ton of players.

Profchaos51d ago

To late MW3 should have been a lesson but here we are two years later with a steaming pile a shite called blops7

bsingle4051d ago

Nothing lasts forever, eventually something will come along to make people forget about COD

51d ago Replies(1)
1Victor51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

@Oumba:”We’ve heard that story many times before 😂”
You know what we seen many times good franchises been run into the ground by bad management like h___o , f___a and most of the sports game oh I forgot the dynasty warriors
Oh forgot to say
Happy thanksgiving to all the N4G members
🥳 🍗 🦃

MDTunkown51d ago

Halo killer once arrived and technically call of duty killer also arrived, its name is Fortnite

dveio51d ago

Call of Duty was riding the revenue horse and charts for ~20 years. Whether undeserved or deserved.

But I endorse everyone to remind you that Microsoft could have decided differently when they took it over.

The money was certainly there, and they could have taken their time revamping the franchise:

Current-gen tech, manageable microtransactions, not imitating Fortnite and returning to core values of the franchise's origin.

They didn't.

Let's see next year. Hopefully without the then 13 years old PS4 and One hardware.

blacktiger51d ago

you need to stop saying "let see next year"

XBManiac51d ago

dveo is an alias of Phil Spencer?

XBManiac51d ago

dveio is an alias of Phil Spencer?

Show all comments (31)
240°

Microsoft Reportedly Sacrificed $300 Million in Sales With Call of Duty on Game Pass

Microsoft reportedly lost over $300 million in Xbox and PC sales by putting Call of Duty on Game Pass, raising concerns over the subscription model’s long-term impact.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community104d ago
maximusprime_104d ago

There are some reports that in March 2023, Microsoft told a court, "Game Pass prices will not increase as a result of the [Microsoft-Activision] Merger."
If true, massive hypocrite .

DaCajun104d ago

If this one franchise is the reason for the game pass price increases, then just leave it off game pass and not make people who don't play COD foot the bill for a game they will never play, like me.

Talk about stupid business decisions.

S2Killinit104d ago

Honestly fuck em dude, they are constantly trying to monopolize the industry instead of just competing.

jeromeface104d ago

MS is full of them.. want another one? wait a couple weeks.

Elda104d ago

Exactly. Keep putting their regular games on GPU day one but big budget games that are very popular like COD should not release on GPU day one, maybe 9 months or a year later once they profit from sales.

RauLeCreuset104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

I don't know if this is a stupid decision. Hear me out. I saw someone comment that it was time to cancel GP and MS would do a 180 like usual. It may be too late this time. It's the history of those other 180s that gives me some doubts about them doing it again or this being a stupid decision versus a cold calculation.

Despite never being the dominant brand, Xbox has at various times tried to push wildly unpopular changes on their customers when they thought they were in a position to get away with it. The 180s came because they overplayed their hand. Customers had options. They lost customers to PS because of the Xbox One launch plans. Anyone who moved to PS4 and stopped gaming on Xbox was a total loss for Xbox.

Customers still have options. The problem for GP subscribers is that most of those options are better for MS than continuing to offer GP as it was before and at the old pricing. Their fans cheered on their acquisitions. Some petitioned regulatory authorities to let the ABK merger happen. Congrats. They are now a dominant 3rd party publisher. Those other options gamers could threaten them with before now work to Xbox's favor.

Other than quitting their games entirely, which now includes ABK, Bethesda, and whatever else they gobbled up, what are upset GP subscribers going to do about it? You can suck it up and eat the price hike. They win. You can cancel GP and buy Xbox games instead. They come out ahead. You can switch to PS, Nintendo, or Steam. So? You'll be paying more for their games their than you were paying for GP, and are they really that committed to continuing to manufacture hardware (in the traditional sense) anyway?

Edit: Making matters worse is that this is likely being driven by pressure from MS, which has increased scrutiny of Xbox since the ABK acquisition.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 104d ago
rakentaja104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

The price would have increased anyway, which was already planned, with or without COD. They didn't lie about anything. You just misunderstood the answer.

PhillyDonJawn104d ago

Yeah they can take CoD off a lower GP. Id take that in a heartbeat.

1Victor104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

@maximusprime:” There are some reports that in March 2023, Microsoft told a court, "Game Pass prices will not increase as a result of the [Microsoft-Activision] Merger."
If true, massive hypocrite .“
.
.
The problem is that you can buy a bakery and tell the community you won’t raise the prices because of the purchase then turn around and raise the prices then say it’s because the ingredients prices when up and be technically telling the truth.
.
Unless the courts would had a agreement in paper that the prices wouldn’t go up for example 5 years there’s no way to enforce it
Edited for typos

Krablante104d ago

It’s worse than that, it’s flat out lying to the courts

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 104d ago
pwnmaster3000104d ago

If this is true, this might be a case of taking a big risk gone wrong.
Is that why they always say revenue and not profit??

My question is, even though they lost 300 million in sales, were they able to offset it.
We might never know.

DarXyde104d ago (Edited 104d ago )

I don't know about you all, but, while that is a lot of money, that's less than I would expect. The totality of game pass users on two platforms playing Call of Duty results in just 300M?

Am I crazy to say that feels like an unusually low amount of revenue?

ocelot07104d ago

It is but for pc gamepass only works on the Microsoft store. Majority of pc gamers don't use any other storefront other than steam. So they wouldn't of sold much on the Microsoft store anyways.

That leaves Xbox one and Xbox Series. $300m does seem low.

rudero104d ago

Well, being that Microsoft is the lowest out of the platforms that sell the game..
Buying Activision, in long term, made up the loss of game sales of said game. By a mile.
But, being cod is tanking as of right now, will be interesting to see if Microsoft can actually save a franchise rather than destroy it.

crazyCoconuts104d ago

They just raised the price of GamePass knowing they would piss off their customers.
You now know - they didn't offset it.

victorMaje104d ago

I’ve been saying for years, you just can’t trust MS period.
1 simple rule, don’t trust MS, act accordingly.

rakentaja104d ago

The price would have increased anyway, which was already planned, with or without COD. They didn't lie about anything. You just misunderstood the answer.

niiopi104d ago

Which is an even bigger reason as to why you can't trust them, they play with semantics instead of being honest and straight forward. Your comment doesnt help their case by putting the blame on the consumer for what and how they said what they said.

PapaBop104d ago

Good, I had hoped Microsoft would be better for Activision and Blizzard than Kotick running the show but that would be expecting Microsoft to be competent at managing studios.

Show all comments (46)