i'm not sold on kinect as a gaming device, but some of the hacks i've seen have me pretty excited tech wise.

Kinect is the main reason why n4g is n4ps3g.

Wait, is the title implying the Kinect is better because Microsoft doesn't mind making their products even more expensive by adding features that are useless like a random motor to rotate/tilt the camera? ~_~

I went to best buy and tried out both Kinect and the move,for the Kinect I played that ball game where you use your arms and legs,and notice sure Kinect moves around but for nothing,why,because if you kick higher than your waist Kinect can't track your legs,so the motor is just for show,I bet most of you guys notice that,and Kinect has a short lag ....And for the Move,it's truly 1:1 tracking,I played the table tennis and the disk game,and found the disk game alot of fun,and the table tennis really does the top spin like the real thing .

How is this even a comparison.

Wii vs Move the only the one.

Its like saying Where my Boat trumps your car.

It sits neatly out of the way when not in use whilst the kinect looks like a big ugly design mistake right by my lovely HD tv. Common seriously, the move camera is worth £30 and the Kinect is £130. It has a better motor, well I never, that's where the £100 quid goes. We don't need on the rails games and whether gamers like it or not the 360 is going to be flooded with them, just accept it.
We can all write rubbish about each one, just get the one you like and ignore everything else.

With Move YOU are the motor:)

The motor is a gimmick. As with any webcam once it is set up correctly then you shouldnt ever need to move it.

He most have a big room because every time I see it on tv the people playing it in a big living room with the you can have a little room and still play move.

it seem's no matter what it's like the Media want to make it out to be one has to win over the other!

both offer experiences that make game design for each unique.

for instance a great area for Kinect is the fitness area for game design..which has shown a great way to employ Kinect focus on game theory and design of it's software..the point about Kinect is it's ability to make movement based games more interactive between you an the machine.

which it has indeed shown the full body interaction to be very good with games that I think Microsoft has released so far.

for Sony's playstation Move i think where Move really shines is

[RTS games]

and it's ability to simulate precise control that aside from a Mouse for the PC, is very telling in it's ability to not only control game function's that are needed quickly but also to be precise at the same time.

Since the Move is able to control RTS type games like that it's a very good direction that game consoles have in my opinion really lacked in the past.

a RTS game console control method that flows better in it's control dynamic which move excels very well at in my Opinion as a[RTS] control method for game consoles.

what i mean by that is with the standard control pad for Game consoles, it's not as good a control method for [RTS] type games in my opinion as what Move is capable of with Controling [RTS] games and their response for spped an quickness.

Now i will say PC has the best [RTS] control system, the KB an Mouse, but for Game console's the Playstation Move makes a great ability to get that very precise control need for Game console [RTS] controls that the game pad in my opinion lacked.

Look at all the ignorant comments. Kinect has 3 cameras that track you in ANY lighting condition. Yes one of the cameras is 30 fps (output not input), however that is not the camera that is tracking you. The RGB camera and Infra red depth sensing camera scanning the room are what is doing the tracking. I have played in all lighting conditions without issue. hmmm, keep trying to compare to eye through ignorance which is nothing but a web cam which has been out for years before the eye was ever thought of.

They are both interesting acessorys. But i prefer move over kinect. I prefer having buttons over no buttons at all

If you want to know how Move trumps Kinect you are going to have to wait a second. I need a big and long piece of paper. Still can't see how everyone is claiming victory already with Kinect's lackluster,lack of variety launch titles, the fact that they could only reach 2.5 million with the help of Black Friday and hacker 'magic' tricks that may or may not be able to be integrated into gameplay in any form or fashion. To make it worse we haven't even seen the results of Black Friday sales for Move. But I am not surprised. It is natural for fanboys to claim victory prematurely.

I mean more to Kinect? Sony has been working on Move for over 10 years, so you think they would have seen a reason to go the way Kinect did?

Anyways I only like Kinect for some reasons:
1.Kinect can move with you Vs you have to get up to PS Eye an move it yourself.

2. Its using good software (Which Microsoft is more known for).

3. No controllers.

Other then that, its about the same as the EyeToy for PS2 and both are fun.

You truly are one lazy gamer.

I think both kinect and move have something slightly different to offer. However, i'm really against the hype of kinect, as it doesn't have that many fun games, which really, almost look exactly like the Wii. At least the Move has a more precise offering, and with potential for shooters. However, i have no doubt the kinect will outsell the move. But i don't think this should be a complete marker of success, considering how much MONEY microsoft has spent on advertisement for the kinect (e.g. i live in a big city, and they had kinect STORES during their launch week in PRIME shopping downtown locations, and EVERY bestbuy has a kinect spokesperson). Anyways, just saying. PS move is barely advertised, and so the profits should balance out in the end.

isnt it gorgeous how we treat animals.

That’s Zuckermans famous pig.

Move controller was extremely accurate great times back then

That definitely would have been the absolute worst time for stick drift to happen...

I always wanted a true to life surgery simulator for PSVR1. I always knew those Move controllers were precise AF under the proper conditions.

Move was a very accurate device under good conditions. Dr Marks even wanted to open it up for hobbyists and developers to extract more data to do more things. I even seen him use it for space, astronaut like simulations.

Sony always had the tech. They just needed the software to go with it. PS Move limit was not having an analog stick. Which it seems the PS5 controller made up for that.

I would like to see them use PS VR 2 for surgery or something with that eye tracking built in.

At least it wasn’t used for a mini-sub