Agree with all except prone.

Why? because that´s something that SOCOM 4 should have not Uncharted 3.

And it does, catch my drift?

Lol, so more character development from minor characters and a longer story but keep it simple?

Honestly, for me the story is low man on the totem pole. In very few games I actually follow it. I play games to, well, PLAY.

For me the ability to grab your opponent and then be able to shoot other people while holding your opponent as a shield a la MGS4 would be cool, especially online. That and the ability to shoot an enemies weapon out of there hands for some comical moments for online and story mode.

Same, they kind of just recklessly advance with no self-preservation

I really liked how they didnt always know where you are, I hope they keep that. Killzone 2 and Uncharted and splinter cell are the only games I've played where the enemy will actually lose your position once you break the line of site instead of being able to magically sense you through walls

AI was quite smart in Uncharted 2. I guess you're talking about the fact that you can loose them and hide but that's a good thing. The loosing position while changing cover worked also great. I really personally liked the stealth aspects of U2 (excluding the opening museum).

Awww I totally ripped you off and didn't even realize it. Here's a bubble.

I like the multiplayer, that what keep me playing till these day, Co-op I played a couple of time but got real bored at it when I completed it

OT: I want more weapons on both story and Multiplayer mode, death match, treasure or whatever mode there is in online

More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.

I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.

A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.

I know they've expertise in third person games.
But given the lack there of in PS catalog, I'd want the other project to be a narrative first person ND game.
Look, there are lots of 3rd person Sony games in variety of flavors. And ND is already doing intergalactic. And since they're pretty expert at gameplay and tech wise in whatever they do, they can easily venture a new genre and ship a first person game/shooter.

funny thing is with failures like Concord and soon to be Marathon, Factions could have been Sony's guaranteed huge success with a shooter! I don't ever play online shooters anymore, but I would have come out of shooter retirement for a new Factions game.

...Way of the Warrior 2: Electric Boogaloo

I’m assuming it’s the unannounced game in the title you posted.

“Naughty Dog Reportedly Canceled a Single Player Game This Year, But Another Unannounced Game Is Still in the Works“

Devs cancel games all the time early stages if it doesn’t turn out the way they envisioned it. We just don’t hear about every one of them.

so a 2028 release at the soonest

'We have several directors on Intergalactic. I work with two game directors: Matthew Gallant and Kurt Margenau, [and] I have a co-writer in Clair Carré.'

Stupid.

Zero experience

Going to be? The damage is already done lol.