All Channels
Popular
Approvals 10/3 ▼
painyboi (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
kharma45 (2) - 5726d ago Cancel
addyjones1234 (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
PSboy (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
deadpool19 (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
SandWitch (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
yarbie1000 (1) - 5726d ago Cancel
Rrobba (2) - 5726d ago Cancel
90°

3D - Is it really worth it?

Much like motion gaming, the ability to play games in 3D is a gimmick against the norm of traditional gaming. Motion gaming has certainly shown it can be succesful and popular both at the same time, courtesy of Nintendo’s huge sales of the Wii. So popular, in fact, that both Sony and Microsoft are intent on cutting in on a piece of the action with Move and Kinect respectively.

Read Full Story >>
splintergamer.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5726d ago
LoaMcLoa5726d ago

It's a freakin' gimmick! Although 3DS looks awesome

deadreckoning6665726d ago (Edited 5726d ago )

-It's expensive

-Need to wear glasses

-The harmful affects of watching images in 3D for prolonged instances have not been fully brought to light.

-As of now, ONLY sports related channels are in 3D

In the end, the value of a 3DTV depends on how hardcore of a gamer your are. I'm not that hardcore, so its not worth it for me yet. The 3DS on the other hand is amazing. Its lineup of 3D games takes a complete shit on PS3's 3D lineup(even though Motorstorm Apocalypse proly looks ASTOUNDING in 3D).

As far as price/value, the 3DS is pretty much the best choice for 3D gaming.

r1sh125726d ago

3D isnt worth it.
Why would I want to wear glasses when my eyesight is pretty much perfect.
Its not worth it and wont be for a few years or until the find a way to use 3dtv without glasses.
Hey i have friends coming around to watch some sports Oh noooo I only got 4 pairs of glasses and 8 people have come around.
Hmmm...
Its a waste right now

Reibooi5726d ago

Until 3D is more like a Hologram as opposed to the 3D we have today I have to say no it's not worth it.

Sure there are some movies that are pretty cool with it but as far as games go it's nothing but a gimmick.

outwar60105726d ago

i dont think hologram tech will work as clarity and colour tech aint that great

Sev5726d ago

How are games in 3D a gimmick? Please explain.

I played Tumble last night for 3 hours in 3D. The game is twice as enjoyable in 3D and makes the PlayStation Move that much more impressive. It really feels like you are reaching into the screen. The immersion is there.

It's not about 3D "pop" out effects, it's about changing the way a game plays. In Tubmle it's not always easy to tell where you are placing your block. In 3D, you have a much better idea of the positioning thanks to improved depth.

In racing games, 3D is a godsend. It let's you judge turns and distance so much better than normal.

How the hell is that a gimmick?

Also, the glasses aren't a big deal.

It pisses me off so much that people bash stuff because they just can't afford it. Keep telling yourself that it's a gimmick so you don't feel as jealous that you don't have the latest tech.

The fact is, it's not a gimmick and it's here to stay, otherwise all of the TV manufacturers out there wouldn't be pushing it so hard.

3D is the future, but it's here today. They just need more content, both in 3D Blu-Ray format, games, and on broadcast TV.

outwar60105725d ago

@Sev1512 hmmm I honestly don't think it is, I mean any 3d game etc(3d movies should have a 15 minute interval every hour in my opinion) comes with health warnings restricting the amount of time you should play to 2 hours a day. i played need for speed at a friends house in his maxed out 3d pc set up (that he spent ridiculous amounts on). After an hour of game time I had a migraine; that's substantial.

Sev5726d ago

How many of you guys saying it isn't worth it actually have a 3DTV.

Idiots.

Until you own a 3DTV and really spend some good quality time at home with it, you cannot say it's not worth it.

I have one, and it was worth every penny.

If you can't afford it, don't bitch and moan saying it isn't worth it. Be honest and say you cannot afford it.

The very same thing happened when Blu-Ray launched. Everyone said it wasn't worth it, the truth was, it was too new to really make a decision and most people couldn't afford it.

I am so sick and tired of people saying it's a gimmick. You mean like the Wii being a gimmick? We all know how that turned out.

Why doesn't everyone wait until next year when prices come down and more 3D content is available.

If the available content out now doesn't do it for you, wait. If you're like me and enjoy being an early adopter, get it now. It's worth it.

outwar60105725d ago

Many people research products and new tech before they buy; that's what makes a consumer an intelligent one. and the Nintendo wii as a motion console worked but everything else such as the extra convergence you get and expect in this day and age was not there,(i know dozens of friends and family who played it relentlessly for the first three months but have let the dust gather soon after)

xXSilentXx5725d ago

not for gaming with a glass on you're face.

YoungKingDoran5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

come over to my place guys and you will see how crystal clear and awesome it is. i wasnt sold on it either, i just needed to buy a new tv, and figured id spend the extra grand, and now i can see its the next step, glasses or no.
oh yes, hats will be eaten

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5725d ago
Darkfiber5726d ago (Edited 5726d ago )

Not by a long shot. $4000 to get a blinding headache? I can cross my eyes and smash myself on the head with a frying pan for free and get the same effect, thanks.

Sev5726d ago

It only gives some people a headache, and that effect diminishes with normal usage.

After a month of owning a 3DTV, I don't get a headache at all anymore, even with long sessions.

You sure it's not jealousy that's giving you a headache?

danmachine5726d ago

after seeing both the AVATAR and Toy story 3 films in 3D, i was astonished at 3D.

can't wait to get a 3ds and watch me some 3d movies/games at home.

tknation5726d ago

My eyes are somewhat peculiar and I'm also partially colourblind, so I might be biased. But I really, /really/ do think 3D is overhyped. There are things like Augmented Reality out there. Money should be going there, damnit.

*grumbles*

Show all comments (30)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community25d ago
26d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted25d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8525d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele25d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk24d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay24d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 24d ago
Athlon10125d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit24d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg24d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10124d ago (Edited 24d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14925d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community38d ago
38d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_38d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle38d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit38d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog38d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog38d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad38d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_38d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage38d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda38d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

38d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community65d ago
BlazedKong64d ago

looks god awful on the base systems