All Channels
Popular
Approvals 10/3 ▼
jay2 (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
Faztkiller (2) - 5828d ago Cancel
jhorner13 (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
Godmars290 (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
movements (2) - 5828d ago Cancel
MensaDad (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
Quagmire (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
NumeroUno (1) - 5828d ago Cancel
340°

Why PS2 Compatibility Needs To Be On PS3

There was once a time when you could play any PlayStation game that you want on the PlayStation 3- namely PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 1 games. Since this admirable time, Sony has slowly removed the function altogether, leaving most people with PS2-less PS3’s as many of the original consoles begin to die.

Over the past year, we’ve seen many rumours floating around that Sony have has a secret firmware in their testing labs with PlayStation 2 compatibility. I, for one, would love for this to be true. There have also been rumours that this function will be embedded into another rumoured feature, a PlayStation Network Premium Service. However, there is one main reason as to why this would be bad for Sony.

Read Full Story >>
platformnation.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5828d ago
qface645828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

my phat broke so i had to get a slim god i miss and want BC
i miss my DQ8

FiftyFourPointTwo5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

"my phat broke so i had to get a slime god i miss and want BC"
You had to get a.... slime? :P

Awww.. why did you have to edit? xD

HolyOrangeCows5828d ago

You're supposed to wait until it's too late for them to edit it back before you make fun of them, silly.

Software emulation isn't perfect. I'd rather just play my Ps2 games on my Ps2.

jadenkorri5828d ago

oh wait,I believe we were were begging for ps2 compatibility to be removed from ps3. My mistake, what could we all of been thinking. Now you want it back, well i guess the tables have turned now. Oh well, my launch 60gig is running strong with full BC...

jaredhart5828d ago

@Jadenkorri
I don't think anyone asked for BC to be removed. Rather Sony chose to remove it to reduce costs.

tyrok3k5828d ago

I believe they removed PS2 support so that people would actually buy PS3 games instead of buying it just for Blu-ray/PS2 games.

jadenkorri5827d ago

I agree that "begging" may not have been the proper term, but all i saw was nothing but complaints that "noone" was playing ps2 games on their ps3 and that we all had ps2's. By removing the ps2 compatibility was to remove hardware from the ps3, essentially reducing costs for sony which then could be sold at a cheaper price. But now we want it back.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5827d ago
jaredhart5828d ago

Is what I read before your edit and I wondered for a second,

"What the eff is a Slime God!?!" lol.

qface645828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

well it was a typo but if it wasn't since i mentioned dragon quest 8 then i guess a slime god would be the ehm god of slimes?
not sure if there actually is one though
metal king slime is the closest

meganick5828d ago

You never heard of the legendary Slime God? It's the mystical creature that crashes and bricks game consoles. Beware!

Bodyboarder_VGamer5828d ago

my 60GB died too, now I got a PS3 Slim and a PS2 Slim but the PS2 games looked so much better on PS3...

LeonSKennedy4Life5828d ago

If you're running a PS2 with component out, they look better on the PS2 than they do on the PS3.

rob60215828d ago

It's not just the component, its the fact PS3 forces all PS2 games into non-interlaced progressive scan format, which looks quite a lot better on most HDTVs.

vickers5005828d ago

F*ck, all these 60gigs dying is scaring me now. I wouldn't want to replace my perfect ps3 with some crappy less featured device. 2 usb ports, no backwards compatibility, no memory card slots? I cant imagine a ps3 without those things.

I use all 4 usb ports, and need more. I recently bought a couple of ps2 games I missed out on last gen (and sold my ps2 awhile ago). And I use the memory cards for game save backups. Not to mention the ps3 60gb looks beautiful with it's shiny black surface, chrome finish, and pressure/heat(?) sensitive buttons, and the switch on the back similar to the ps2 that gives me some nostalgia from the ps2 glory days.

I cant imagine losing all of that in favor of a "thinner" ps3.

RatFuker5828d ago

centimental value...but then again, there are true gems...

Sigh5828d ago

im playing DQ8 @ the moment on my 80gig PS3.

Darkstorn5828d ago

LOL someone disagreed with every single comment in this string. Is someone butthurt?

vickers5005828d ago

I got this game about a year ago for my ps3 (don't have a ps2) and love it. It's the only JRPG that I like.

Sunny_D5828d ago

I still have a launch 60gb still going strong. Want to trade? :p But, I don't even play PS2 games on my system at ALL. Seems like you could use it more than me.

TheJudgement5828d ago

can just call sony to repair your the orig and not have to buy a new 1.

Fruit Loops5828d ago

im gonna wait on that news about the new model before i get a slim.

(i got ylod)

lelo2play5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

Sony doesn't want PS2 Compatibility on PS3. They make a HD version of a PS2 game and resell it to the consumer... like they did with god of war 1 and 2. They would bee pretty stupid to put PS2 Compatibility now, when they have a perfect way to milk money from the consumers reselling the same game in HD.

DigitalEnemy5827d ago

Totally agree. Why would Sony bring B/C back when they can release HD remakes of the classics? And as GOW collection proved, we will buy them if Sony make them....

Would be very suprised if it was part of PSN+, but realistically its not coming back guys...

Shang-Long5827d ago

beacuse they arent going to re release every game. but i get what you guys are saying

mantisimo5827d ago

But am nervous as they do seem to have started dying a bit and have sold my Ps 2.

That said as more and more next gen titles are released I revisit my ps2 stuff less and less although ico and Shadow still get played regularly but if they are to release an HD package of both games then I would buy it and then really wouldn't need backwards comp anymore.(except maybe for silent hill 2+3 occasionally)

princejb1345827d ago

i have a fat ps3 and i dont even play my ps2 games
i prefer playing the newer games than go back to games that i have played several times

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5827d ago
unrealgamer585828d ago

lol these articles should be banned

3sq5828d ago

Nah, I didn't buy PS3(HD console) to play PS2 games.

YoungKingDoran5828d ago

right... lets never play any games made before 2006 ever again!

3sq5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

My point is if you want to play PS2 games, buy a PS2. It only costs $99 (a PS3 game costs $60) but then again everyone should have a PS2 by now. If you have money to buy a PS3, there shouldn't be any problem to buy a PS2.

Use the PS3 to play the games that it was made/meant for it, that way you your PS3's lifespan will be longer.

shoddy5828d ago

Those who whine about it is so old school.

xXSilentXx5828d ago

Live in the future not in the Past we AR in the year 2010 :P not in 2001 anymore.

TheGameFoxJTV5828d ago

I don't understand why NOT to have it.

NateNater5828d ago

Sony don't have PS2 BC in PS3 because of cost. Current PS3s would not be able to be sold at $299. That's the main reason why it was dropped. The second reason is because Sony still have individual PS2s out there that are generating a nice profit for them. Sony probably says something like "Who is gonna buy a PS2 if its already included in a PS3?"

Furthermore, ever since 2006, PS2s yearly sales have been decreasing by 2 million each year. This means that many people already have a PS2. This is most likely Sony's reasoning behind dropping PS2 support in PS3.

I have an original 60gig PS3 and I can say that I rarely use it's PS2 backwards capabilities even though I have a ton of PS2 games just sitting around. There's just too many awesome PS3 games out right now I guess :P

TheGameFoxJTV5827d ago

I never finished Disgaea 2.........

Show all comments (79)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community30d ago
30d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted30d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8530d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele29d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk29d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay29d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Athlon10130d ago (Edited 30d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit29d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg29d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14929d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community43d ago
43d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_43d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle42d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit42d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog43d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog43d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad43d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_43d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage43d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda42d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

43d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community70d ago
BlazedKong69d ago

looks god awful on the base systems