ZDnets John Carroll:
To my mind, though, a Microsoft that is first to the price reduction punch is a nightmare scenario for Sony. Though Nintendo might be the current sales leader (trumping both PS3 and XBOX monthly sales), from a competitive standpoint, XBOX 360 is more the direct competitor (at least outside Japan). Both target hard core gamers, and both offer more performance and graphics capability than the lower-cost Nintendo Wii.
An even lower cost XBOX 360 with a larger selection of games and larger installed base is a situation to which Sony will not be able to respond. Sony is limited in how much it can reduce the price of the PS3. They might try, but the higher cost of the PS3 (partly driven by the costs of the mandatory integrated BluRay player) limits their maneuverability. Sony's PlayStation group has been laying people off, and though PS2 still sells well, that isn't sustainable long-term.
A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.
Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.
15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.
Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.
Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.
It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst
Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.
S2Killinit
live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating
Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.
Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.
This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality
..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....
...Really???
PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.
Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.
He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.
More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.
Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.
Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.
All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.
Former Naughty Dog artist Gabriel Betancourt explains why the "sweet spot" for game teams is under 200 people and how AAA "factories" kill creativity.
There’s definitely some truth to this. When teams get too large, coordination starts to outweigh creativity—layers of approval, risk aversion, and tight deadlines can turn bold ideas into “safe” ones. Keeping a team under ~200 people sounds ideal for maintaining clear communication and a shared vision. That said, massive AAA projects also come with huge technical demands and expectations, so scaling up isn’t always avoidable. The real challenge is figuring out how to keep that small-team creativity alive inside big studio structures.
More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.
I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.
A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.
I just noticed it says this at the bottom of the article "John Carroll has delivered his opinion on ZDNet since the last millennium. Since May 2005, he's been a Microsoft employee."
My opinion is if Microsoft did drop its prices Sony would probably be forced to do the same pretty soon which if that happens lower prices for all us gamers would be a great thing so in the end we win!
Yea consumers would win, M$ would most likely win, Sony would end up eating madd $$$$$. They'd be forced to drop their price, when they didn't want to, with no titles still out.
If M$ wanted to kill Sony I think they could right now. Just by dropping the price. Sure they'd eat a lot of losses, but wouldn't it be worth it for them to win this thing?
Do they really have to price drop first?.
Right now 360 is beating PS3. So i think there is no reason to lower its price. Untill the PS3 sales pick up when that happends which the real question is "When" i feel MS will drop the price to make it even harder for those increasing PS3 sales to increase. Games make the console but 1 or 2 games isn't going to sale 10million copies.
another article by MS chatterbox