Sam Bage from wedotech.net writes "Right, to business. I'm not happy. Very unhappy actually and it's because of the Fallout 3 DLC released for the PS3.
When I found out the Fallout 3 DLC was being released for the PS3 I was ecstatic. The Xbox 360 and PC versions have had the DLC for a while and I watched on with sullen, wanting eyes. I could have gotten it for the PC or even the Xbox but I had played Fallout 3 on the PS3 and was not about to play the game again on another console. 80 hours+...sod that for a bag of beans."
A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.
Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.
Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.
Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.
To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.
all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.
Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too
Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.
Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".
Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.
Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.
PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh
Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.
So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.
Fallout 3 game designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the upcoming remaster should revise the game's gunplay to be more modern.
Give us FO3 with all the dlc remastered like ESO. Load times faster, quality of life improvements, gun play improvements
I believe it shouldn't just be graphical they should make improvements where they can to make the game better. A simple face lift isn't what's needed
Still my favorite one. I remember getting a digital copy of FO3 when I got FO4(XBO). It was nice to finally play a stable version of the game. Then when I got a Series S it was an even better expierence. Quick resume and FPS boost made it feel like a whole new game. Updated gunplay would be very welcome though. One of the few things FO4 did better.
Aye.
Played the 360 DLC and it was full of bugs on release date.
It put me off from Fallout 3.
Dont plan on touching that game again
I dont know what kind of internal testing they did b4 releasing the game -.-
Unfortunately I'm right there with ya skv007. Bugs, bugs oh a new gun, oh no it's another bug. And the agony on Mothership Zeta no way back, yeah sutes the story but yo. Every other path on DLC is open when you wanna git back.
You could understand these bugs being available if fan pressure caused Bethesda to release the DLC early, but it had 6 months to iron out issues that were prevelent with the 360 version and they didn't. Such a shame really, our DLC reviews for each pakc were knocked by 30 marks each.