Wish they would've told us this sooner so I could've rather bought the GoTY edition....oh well.

I aint buying the damn game again just for some extra content, forget it. If they want my money, then make a damn patch.

Let me deflect that morons words back at him. In a GOTY package for a game that isn't close in quality or play to being GOTY, amidst a flood of great PS3 titles there is simply no incentive for PS3 owners to buy.

Ouch Morganfell, a tad harsh don't you think? Fallout 3 won many GotY awards and deservingly so, the scope of the game is mighty impressive, even if you aren't a fan of the genre.

I still think it is ridiculous that consumers who purchased your product aren't given the full array of DLC to expand their experience, a bit of a kick in the teeth I must say.

Very poor math. This arguement is very flimsy and simple speculation at best.

If you are going to make these kinds of claims you need to do the research and find out if it is indeed profitable or not.

You can not make an intelligent statement on profitability without knowing the cost of bringing DLC from development to the PSN store.

When you can show me those numbers support your claims I will take this seriously.

No it isn't harsh. I and a great many people I know grew tired of going in one building after another, scrapping by on ammo and tons of stupid mutants stomping back and forth. They do not eat or socialize they were just like all the other VAC cannon fodder. Dumb, dumb, dumb. This game is one overhyped piece of crap.

I hardly ever, almost never get rid of a title. I have done it a very few times. This was one of them. Instead of post apocalyptic MAD Maxesque environments we get this:

http://img4.imageshack.us/i...

Tell me someone else saw the resemblance.

Instead of Taarna or the B-17 we get the Captain Sternn episode.

Uninteresting as hell. Hopefully Rage is shaping up to be what Fallout 3 should have been. Actually, Fallout 3 should have been anything except what it was - a blight on the soul of the original and it's sequel.

Point taken, you don't like the game, though a great many people would disagree with your statements. Anyway everyone is entitled to their opinion though, so thanks for the clarification.

Bubbles up. That's exactly why Bethesda isn't releasing this DLC on PS3. And you know what, it cost them my 65 bucks. Yeah, I was really hyped for Fallout 3. Sounded like a cool concept, I'm RPG starved, and Bethesda isn't known for making short games.

But once I heard that the PS3 version was visually inferior (not by much but still) and wasn't getting any DLC, I opted to use that money and buy something else.

I sorta wish Devs would just make the entire game exclusive if they're going to do this sort of thing.

He is right that MS paid for this DLC so its exculsive to the 360 just like GTA4 DLC. SO why do people still think PS3 is getting DLC as well? Maybe when ever there contract voids perhaps? who knows.

You bought a great game anyway and it sucks not getting DLC but this is the same thing as say Mirrors Edge DLC that PS3 folks got and so on you know.

MS picked a great game to secure DLC for.

I dont see Xbox only players complaining that they dont get FF13 Versus but every article i see PS3 people bragging about it and i saw Xbox360 players trying to brag about this DLC before but many people blew it off saying who cares its just DLC. Really now, is that fair that they get Versus and the 360 dont, they will buy the game and wouldnt they want their experience lengthened as well?

Compared to what we gave them collectively that is nothing. Oh please spare me your whining Bethesda. million alone * 60. What do you get enough money to cover the tab I think. But were not good enough. Bethesda again from my heart to yours.......F^CK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL! Don't fell for the flamebait people.

In case you guys don't get it, that Sony DL tax is paid by gamers. It's not like DLC comes for free and publishers have to pay for we play it, they'll just pass on the cost on the price of your map pack and what not...

After all, regardless of platform, you'll have to pay to use the infrastructure. The difference here is that Sony only wants extra money on what we actively DL, the "free" online play and all the rest of the PSN is probably paid within the 60US$ of the games we buy.

While that MS asks the same 60 bucks for game, probably has a cut just as great or bigger than that of Sony (seing how most 3rd parties are making more money on PS3) and still asks you 50 bucks per year on P2P online play.

Except the PS3 isn't getting them. Is literally being treated as a 2nd class citizen.

Bethesda and other developers reward for certain consumers buying their product...

Ya true, and Valve is guilty of this as well but for your information about these patches is that they are preparing for the DLC to come. And the one before that was to add something back into the game that was already taking out which the PS3 already had anyway. SO the 360 got the less end in the first place.

MS still charges publishers certification fees to put content on XBL...but they don't pay a bandwidth fee...MS thought it would be better to charge the end user that instead of their 'business partners'...