230°

Fallout 3 - disappointing DLC?

Msxbox-world raises the issue about the cost of downloadable content for Fallout 3, and that gamers are paying a hefty price for a mere 2 hours of additional gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
Pennywise6247d ago

2 hours of gameplay?? What?

Vecta6247d ago

yeah iunno about that, Iv already spent 2 hours on it and have only completed half of it.

original seed6247d ago

Im 3 hours in and still have not half way through. I like to search for things.

Philip J Fry6247d ago

MSXBOX-World disappointing website.

Silellak6247d ago

You know, the sad thing is that even if it were only 2 hours for $10 (which it sounds like it isn't), that'd be about par for the course for modern games.

$10 * 6 = $60.
2 hours * 6 = 12 hours.

Sounds about right. How depressing.

dragunrising6247d ago

I'm waiting for all three sets of DLC before I splurge. Maybe there will be a value 3 pack? Glad the DLC is greater than 3 hours for a number of people. I know I will spend a substantial amount of time with the new content once I get it. I take a 50 hour game Oblivion/Fallout 3 and make it 100 to 150 hours easy...:-p

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6247d ago
vincentvegawchz6247d ago

Is this Serious... I was really upset to learn that this DLC wasnt coming to my PS3, but now, i am not really that sad about it, it actually has me laughing, because MS probably paid for this Exclusive*Maybe Times* rights to this DL Content, and it adds 2 hours of content?? Please, thats an Insult... I have about 65 hours poured into just one of my characters, and havnt even finished half way with the story on that... I was upset at first, but this dissapointment of DL Content is quick to ease the mind. Doesn't mean i wouldn't like to have it, im just not shelling out money for 2 extra hours of gameplay on an already Outstanding game.

rawd6247d ago

2 hours, are you kidding me

Nexy6247d ago

If the DLC were on PS3 as well you guys would all have totally different things to say.

Pennywise6247d ago

Yeah we would all jump for joy that we can pay $10 for 2 hours of game play. Not everything, everyone says on this site is part of some conspiracy console war going on.

Gamers spend money on games. There are A LOT of games to buy. We must be picky and criticize the games that are not worth it. Gamers come to N4G for news and opinions. You might not like mine and I dont like yours.

MGOelite6247d ago

if it was on ps3 it would be longer??? dumbass

marichuu6247d ago

I have it on the 360, and absolutely worship the game... When I saw that it was released, I just went "zomfg, gotta get home and DL it", but this piece of DLC sounds very disappointing. I'll end up getting it either way, but I'm not rushing it. I'm not buying it with the MS points I can get online... buying some cheaper points on gamehubs.com first.

IdleLeeSiuLung6247d ago

lol @mgoelite

It is a disturbing direction for sure. Shorter DLC at the same price tag. Features taken out of games to be sold as DLC. Nobody is forcing me to buy it, but we used to get a lot more free content. Now, everything is a DLC. I partly blame MS for this!

Halochampian6247d ago

I highly doubt that Alaska was suppose to be in the original game.

SL1M DADDY6247d ago

Please, give it a rest. 10 bucks for 2 hours of game is simply pathetic no matter what console it's on. This is not a console issue, this is Bethesda turning their backs on gamers in search of some KY to give us the skin flute up the pooper. Sorry, but no deal.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6247d ago
PS360WII6247d ago

They are talking about the price and no it's not 2 hours. Ah well either you like it or you don't and either you have it or you don't.

Show all comments (44)
60°

Fallout 3 Remaster Is Allegedly Planned For Release At Some Point In The Future

A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
LucasRuinedChildhood57d ago

Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.

Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.

cloganart56d ago

I haven't seen anything on these performance issues? What's been going on?

walken756d ago

Probably the Unreal Engine issues, I skipped it for that reason.

Snookies1257d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.

To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.

Michiel198956d ago

all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.

Extermin8or3_56d ago

Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too

jznrpg56d ago

Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.

Christopher56d ago

Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".

BlaqMagiq156d ago

Can't wait. Won't have to go back to my PS3 to play this when it comes out.

Show all comments (14)
80°

Fallout 3 remastered on the Nintendo Switch 2 is what we deserve, not the worst Fallout game

Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
jambola128d ago

Why exactly do you think you deserve it??

Phoenix76128d ago

Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.

gigoran8128d ago

PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh

1nsomniac128d ago

Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.

UltimateOwnage128d ago

So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.

Show all comments (6)
110°

Fallout 3 designer expects remaster to revise gunplay to make it closer to Fallout 4

Fallout 3 game designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the upcoming remaster should revise the game's gunplay to be more modern.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer1992316d ago

Give us FO3 with all the dlc remastered like ESO. Load times faster, quality of life improvements, gun play improvements

I believe it shouldn't just be graphical they should make improvements where they can to make the game better. A simple face lift isn't what's needed

ZeekQuattro316d ago

Still my favorite one. I remember getting a digital copy of FO3 when I got FO4(XBO). It was nice to finally play a stable version of the game. Then when I got a Series S it was an even better expierence. Quick resume and FPS boost made it feel like a whole new game. Updated gunplay would be very welcome though. One of the few things FO4 did better.