You don't have to spend a pile of money every year on upgrades if you have a PC. I get a new PC (top of the line) maybe every 3 years or so and so I can always run the latest games. They won't always run at max settings but they'll look better than their console counterparts.

Read the article, broseph. PS3 has some graphic bugs, deal with it. It's just a multiplatform game anyway, so just chill.

1. PC
2. 360
3. PS3

Funny the "last gen garbage" runs it better. -_-;

I know that when I first popped the game in on my ps3, I had to adjust the bright/contrast so I could see better. Looks great in my opinion, though a little dark without being adjusted. I don't have a hdtv though, or even a decent sdtv lol.

Your logic is stupid. It makes absolutely no sense for anyone to buy a game and play it for fun. Your supposed to buy games and review it pixel by pixel and pause and pay extra close attention to every single minute detail and NOT enjoy the thing.

Then spend the remainder of your free time scowling the interwebs looking for people who disagree with your forced-fact opinion and troll anyone who thinks otherwise.

C'mon man, get with the times, no one has enjoyed a game since last generation!

Hey man, just wanted to let you know. I got 2gig ram, 1.6 dual core, with a 8800gt, running at 1680x1050 at max settings, and it runs beautiful. Not choppy at all.

I know the 8600 is a little slower number wise, but it should still run really really well. They did do a good job optimizing it.

and for the achievement and trophy collectors, the PC version comes with Games for Windows, so Achievement Points for XBL account.

on another note...

I will probable get this for the 360 too. Just to much fun to pass up.

They don't pay thousands of dollars. If you already own a pc (most people do) it's cheaper than a console to transform it into a gaming machine.

Yeah be jealous because u cant play the game the way I do Fvckermother.

You are right we get what we pay for. Whether we bought a PS3 or a XBox 360 still have something a PC gamer doesn't. Extra money in our wallets, the ability to sit on a big comfy couch w/ a beer playing games with our wireless controllers and one last thing. The comfort in knowing that we don't have to worry about our consoles having the right drivers, version of .NET or Silverlight, DirectX and non-stop need to upgrade the PC to run the latest and greatest as well as use tons of resources running an anti-virus/anti-malware program.

Ooh and Open Zone --->

kthxbye

Darkseider: Only your last point is valid. PC gaming is NOT more expensive than console gaming (if you already have a PC, you only need a graphics card and maybe a sound card, which are combined still cheaper than a console). Also, you can play PC games from the couch, if you feel like it (or install an overhead beamer, whatever). The beer is possible, too!

Uhhhmm, I didn't think the PS3 version had trophies.

"Not at launch...It remains to be seen what we do down the road. It wasn't something we were able to incorporate into the game for launch."

Yeah, that's what the developer said. Who knows if they will bring them to the game later, though.

Heh, not for PC-Gamers, but you know, console gamers are another breed...

they are talking about a $100 gpu.

Yeah, I'd really like to know where the console fanboys' financial arguments come from. You CAN of course build a 5000$ PC, but it will maybe be 20% better than a well-constructed 500$ PC. So it's not really recommended to shell out thousands of bucks.

You PC guys really crack me up. I have yet to see a game on my Notebook, Dual Core T8300@2.4GHz, 2GB RAM, QuadroFX 570M@256MB VRam (that's a G84M based core with dedicated ram) which runs any game better then my PS3. Hint. It doesn't. And these specs they refer to are basically on par (or even below my specs). And then, I do not have to run thru the hazel that my 120GB drive is constantly full...

i'm not flamming or attacking you but.... your pc is on the medium side. i have far cry 2 and fallout 3 and they look better than the console versions. trust me i personally checked cause i own a ps3 too.

i love consoles so don't put me in the "pc guys" category. if you are a no brain fanboy... then you are barking at the wrong tree. if you want to discuss things politely and in a civilized manner. then you are welcome to reply.

ps sorry for my english. not my mother language

Then just let me say, and average PC usually cannot compete with a console. Well, and I'd not put my Notebook into an average class. Not compared to what's sold in quantities. I perfectly understand that its possible to outperform a console with a PC, no doubt about that. But I got a special on my notebook. $1200. And that's cheap. So, I just don't want to hear this "wha ha, but my PC can play this better" because with an average machine, you don't. And I even would insist, when you say, your experience is better, its not that far off from the console version. How big is your screen ? Or do you also own the PS3 version of the said games that you can compare directly?

Fact is, those shots had no advantage what so ever. The first one did not really show any higher resolution (how, with that tiny resolution?? Except a blurry ground texture in the 360 version while I think the PC and PS3 version looked pretty similar or the same - could be the position of the camera in the game) and the second simply showed a different scene. Whatever. I was close to get back into PC gaming, but after a couple of "re-tries" I gave up. Just to get the games I wanted running, would have needed a significant investment. And I got a second PS3 instead. Which was still cheaper.

Companies ain't your friend, bro.