Leonid Melikhov: Join us on The Primal Podcast Episode #19 - Microsoft Next-Gen strategy is starting to get leaked and we discuss why Sony has been so quiet as well.
The next-gen Xbox will offer a "powerful experience", and will enable players to "take their library with them", according to Xbox president.
I'd bet good money it'll be Play Anywhere titles and cloud streaming for the rest. Basically what is available now. I think they lack the business case and commitment to get Xbox console games working on it natively.
Yeah, I'm with you on that.
Technically, it shouldn’t be hard to make Xbox games run on PC. But there’s just not enough rea$$$on for them to do it.
Actually, ignore my last post.
There is a huge rea$$on that I forgot. Currently, the Xbox Windows App and the Microsoft Store take a much lower revenue share from third-party releases. Since 2021, it's only 12%, compared to the 30% they get on Xbox (the industry standard). So they do actually have a motive to push Xbox versions of the games instead.
Of course, they could also simply change that revenue split at any moment, but I assume that wouldn’t go over well with developers, who generally already don’t like their store.
@vits, yeah the percentages are under their control. I imagine part of agreeing to a Play Anywhere license is unifying that percentage regardless of what version of the Xbox store the game was purchased on, but I'm just speculating.
Granted only a small % of their library is Play Anywhere
Depends where you buy the game. If it's from the xbox store, it'll be the console version. Steam or Windows the PC version.
Play anywhere works for select titles but it's highly limited in terms of saturation.
Many many thrid party games do not have play anywhere functionality.
Translation layer seems viable for series and one with emulation for 360 and lower
I just hope they don't lean on cloud as a solution
This will just mean games will work on the console and on PC / Handheld. It 100% does not mean access to your Steam library on an xbox console which will never happen.
If at that point you're buying Xbox hardware then you're a complete idiot. Just buy a Steam Machine or a laptop or make yourself a PC to your needs and rid yourself of having to deal with MS outside of having to deal with Windows.
Nothing wrong with xbox hardware. Some people still prefer the console experience. Now we can have both with one machine. Im excited to see what it can do.👍
and I think you'll end up being really happy with what MS delivers in their next console. But I suspect it'll become niche, but that doesn't matter, it'll be supported and the hardcore xbox fans will enjoy it I think. But I would suggest not buying any more game from Xbox stores, only start buying from Steam because Xbox days are numbered and everyone knows it. Better start building your Steam library sooner rather than later.
Cause steam is almost in every device now, just doesn't game Steam pass like game pass.
If it can play my physical games, I’m interested.
What kinda sucks is the exclusive stuff. Meaning that if it truly is the most powerful hardware next gen, it will be held back by I guess-the PS6 handheld (if Sony implements a parity clause like how Microsoft did with the series s). It would be really cool to have a game that would only work on the most powerful hardware. I know it’s a pipe dream given industry trends, diminishing returns and mismanagement of first party games from Microsoft themselves.
They will let you merge your library with your PC (windows store) store including x360 tittles. Keep posted on December 11.
Also somethingn similar to Movies Anywhere, you will see your games on others stores like Steam, Epic etc, after sync accounts.
I too think it would be like that too. Galaxy (GOGs launcher) can see your games in other store fronts.
Now why would would they put a xbox logo on it. Everyone knows xbox is dead, duh! 🤫
Nah, I doubt it. This device could be something great for xbox console fans. Thats who its for. I dont expect you sony guys to like it cause its not for you. Its for the millions of core fans who make xbox their primary source for gaming.
***This device could be something great for xbox console fans. Thats who its for. I dont expect you sony guys to like it cause its not for you.***
If it lets you play everything, how is it not for every fan? As a Sony fan, I'll just go back to playing Outer Worlds 2? I swear people are stuck thinking that if you don't agree with them then they obviously are in that one group of people they don't understand.
Valve said they're aiming for entry-level prebuilts not consoles, and those start at the $700-$800 range.
You mean you hope it will. Prepare to be disappointed. Xbox is definitely releasing another console.
I think you're correct. But don't expect it to even sell the 33 million Xbox series x/s has sold. It will be much less than that. I'm thinking it might not even reach 20 million sold. But I do think it will be a nice machine
You didn't see the latest valve says it won't be subsiding it or pricing it competitive to a console
I have a strong conviction once everybody gets on even grounds in term of portable and docked with streaming they’re all going to lock their stores under one ecosystem . I doubt they want the hybrid console to be able to play steam psn and everything else . What’s the incentive for one to go for Xbox per se if steam machine does everything it does ?
Steam machine wont do everything it does. Its only an entry level pc. It'll be cool but not better than the next gen xbox.
I want Microsoft to succeed, but they keep shooting themselves in the foot, so I don't know if they'll be able to turn it around. Two flops in a row doesn't inspire confidence.
Flop? I don't think so. Series x is hardly a flop. Still the best console with the best features.
This cant be a real comment. How can you have comfortably the worst selling Xbox (even over the original) and it not be a flop?
Xbox Series X/S is selling at a worse pace than the Xbox One. That is absolutely a flop. What you think is irrelevant to facts.
If this can't play your existing Xbox library natively and play PC games. The next Xbox may as well never launch. It will be doomed to failure.
I've been hearing a lot of rumors of Microsoft investing heavily into Xbox emulation so it sounds like that's what they're aiming for.
The Ally X strategy isn't going to work for console players.
If they by a new Xbox console, they will want to play their Xbox games natively.
Starting to think Molyneux is handling the marketing for this thing.
Hype is dangerous, and frankly, I see no real compelling reason for anyone to buy this thing. It sounds like it's a box where you rent everything and need to always be online, even when you go portable.
yeh, for top money, and people are already scrambling together all they have
I’m actually interested in this because my PC needs an upgrade. This to me seems better than a Steam Machine that’s locked into only the Steam ecosystem. We’ll see though, I trust Microsoft as far as I can throw them.
SM is still a pc and confirmed you can install a second OS so you're not locked into only steam
Wow, MS already moving on. Question is, do most people even care.
All digital incoming. Xbox fans said it wouldn’t happen but know have changed their tune.

WC: The new Xbox platform is said to be a "premium" experience, and now we have some details on what it'll look like.
Original title : Microsoft's ambitious new Xbox: Your entire Xbox console library, full power of Windows PC gaming & no multiplayer paywall
After a weekend of negative reaction to Halo going to PlayStation Jez Corden shares this news of a powerful Xbox with no online fee. Assuming it has come direct from Microsoft, it demonstrates how companies feed information through their preferred bloggers/journalists as leaks to influence public sentiment. It also shows why Jez is uncritical off the hands that feed him.
I really dont see how they were gonna charge for MP when it's a PC and you can just load another store like Steam and buy there. It would be stupid.
But they been saying this, the only kinda new info is the no paying for online.
They have been say this almost all year now lol
That is the only possible way for MS to bring this to market at a price that makes any sense. They have to mass produce an SOC that targets upper-mid-tier PC graphics (e.g., a system build around a rtx 5070 or 5070 Ti today).
You have to also ask how upgradable is a modern PC these days.
Sure a GPU is easy to upgrade on its own but CPU, ram and mobo are all typically aligned.
If you have 32gb of ddr4 ram now and want a new CPU that means a new mobo that has the latest socket and upgrading the ram to ddr5 because the new mobos only support ddr5
The PSU and case are really the only constants these days.
IF this is true then Microsoft is just trying to force Sony to do the same at a later time claiming everyone is doing multiplayer for free and so should them.
Remember Microsoft was the one to open that door and now that they have failed in the consoles sale market they will try to take Sony with them as well.
At the end of this road it all comeback to the 360/ps3 era of one free one pay for online play and if it goes for free online play I’m all up for it but Microsoft have a sore looser stench to them with this move
Firstly there's no benefit for MS to make Sony lose money. Only lost revenue for MS in giving up those essential subs. I'm sure they're racking their brains over there to try and come up with a way to hold on to them as long as possible.
Secondly, Sony doesn't have to worry about this because customers could get free online already today via PC, this is no different. PS also provides pretty great games every month as part of their service so many won't want to leave that.
I wonder if this is just going to be built straight into windows? If that's the case then why be confined to this Xbox PC that may not be able to upgraded. When you can just build a potentially better pc at a cheaper cost.
'When you can just build a potentially better pc at a cheaper cost.' ~ we dont know that. Final Price vs specs + features n all. (yes they can still mess it up coz MS but for now we don't know the final price)
(Although we can think it more like for eg, Steam Deck purchase: 500 bucks, still a PC, can't be upgraded / can build a better PC spec ~ but features portability)
@StoneTitan
More like intrigued (being a Steam fan) ~ coz a smol PC masquerading as an Xbox but will play both Steam library and native Xbox library seems abit interesting to me.
All while running on a new custom AMD all in one SoC (cpu, gpu, memory et al in single die)
{Even if its not that successful at the end, it's still interesting on paper right now}
I mentioned it before but modern PC's are not all that upgradable these days.
A GPU is easy to upgrade but CPU, ram and mobo change constantly and upgrading one will often mean upgrading all three at once because the CPU socket you have won't support a new CPU type and the new mobo won't support the old ram you already have e.g ddr4 to ddr 5
And looking at what's coming up towards the end of the year ddr6 ran is going to start coming out and again you're up for a new mobo and CPU if you want to use it
Not saying this has a chance of succeeding, but I think the idea based on AMD's announcement is that they'll develop a SOC for this (CPU, GPU, memory all on a single die).
That should be cheaper for a number of reasons, at the expense of upgradeability.
"If that's the case then why be confined to this Xbox PC that may not be able to upgraded. When you can just build a potentially better pc at a cheaper cost."
Clearly MS is betting there is a sizeable group of people who want to get into PC gaming but who are still intimidated by the prospect of building or even selecting the right one with the right specs. Obviously people who have built PCs won't buy this, but there are plenty of people who buy gaming laptops, despite the lack of upgradeability, for the simplicity, even if they don't really need the portability factor of a laptop. MS clearly believes they can sway this group with the prospect of an "easy" PC for a reasonable price. Valve had the same idea with Steam Machines, but never committed to it in a meaningful manner.
"Clearly MS is betting there is a sizeable group of people who want to get into PC gaming but who are still intimidated by the prospect of building or even selecting the right one"
That I 100% agree with. However, This is MS. They love to be confusing. No doubt their are going to be different selections of Xbox PC.
Xbox PC Series S 1080p PC.
Xbox PC Series X 1440p/4K PC.
Then if you have different partners like Dell and HP, Asus, Cyberpower, Lenovo.
It's what went wrong with the Steam machines. To many partners and configurations. I don't trust ms to be any different.
@ocelot07
Yeah I think to have any chance of having this work, they need to select a single hardware partner (seems like Asus is likely) and have limited SKUs of the device.
And yeah that was the issue with Steam Machines. There needed to be at most like 3 steam machines so people could clearly understand what they were and devs could have a specific target (or a few limited targets). The way Valve has handled Steam Deck has been far better, with the main differences in SKUs being storage space and screen quality.
I think there's a decent proportion of gamers that don't want to deal with the ins and outs of PC. So there's a marker there.
On the other hand, I think this Xbox is well outside of a console gamer's price sensitivity.
Ultimately, I think people are just looking for ways to play new games, which the PS6, Switch 2, and PC will do, with two of three definitely being cheaper.
Really, this Xbox is for people who want a higher end console experience without the driver updates or flexibility. A "simpleton PC", if you will.
However, there is something worth noting about this thing...
I think I've heard it's supposed to have multiple store fronts. If that's the case, it does defeat the incentive for Sony to launch a PS6 Pro because a lot of their games are on Steam now and the Xbox would play it better in theory. So if you're in the market for an upgrade, it almost doesn't make sense to buy a Pro console (unless Sony really delays Steam releases—I don't see them going full exclusive again).
I I'm not sure about that last part. Still no GT7 (rumours it was cancelled) still no Demon's Souls (rumours it was cancelled) and no Astro Bot, Uncharted Collection or even Bloodborne a game it feels like 99% of PC players have been asking for.
So MP being free right out of the gate. That just leaves GP with its games incentives. So they have to find another way to get ppl to GP now. It'll cost 1000$ the very less they can do is get ppl playing right out of the gate with out needing to pay for MP. As I said before they'll need stronger incentives to get ppl to retain to GP and especially grow GP.
I feel like millions will leave Game Pass because you don't need to pay to play online. All the Cod people. But I do feel like this "console" will be pretty cool for the hardest of hardcore Xbox gamers. They'll love it. But the casuals? Yeah I dont think they'll be buying into it. But it'll be a cool, niche and expensive console that will satiate hardcore Xbox gamers. Good for them. No exclusives, but they'll learn not to care.
I can definitely see that. I can see quite a bit of ppl leaving GP since they don't need it for MP. I have no idea what they'll do to retain. What shiny new incentives could they add. Probably not much. It's only gonna be for hardcore ppl. I already know how it's gonna go. The first few years it's gonna sell well. Specifically that first year. X guys are gone brag about it then sales are gonna fall off s cliff and be stuck at 20 million sold,
Less than OG Xbox. Then they'll shift the goal post to something else.
GP was so popular because it was a steal.
They raised the GP price so drastically because it was a steal (cannibalizing sales).
When it's not a steal, it won't be popular.
Nobody uses the Xbox store on PC unless they're using GP.
MS making GP a linchpin for their success was a mistake imo.
Consoles have always been about convenience. Not having to mess around with configurations. Not to mention a much more level playing field plus pricing.
While it’s nice not the pay for multiplayer, the flip side is you’ll pay a bigger expense up front.
If you play a lot of games then the investment can be worth it. But if you’re lucky to get only to a few then the investment really wouldn’t be worth it in the long run.
I don't understand. Most games on PC doesn't require you to go into any settings. The only times I have ever gone there is if my PC is struggling to run the game or if the developer does something stupid like leaving motion blur on by default. On consoles I tend to go into the settings to turn off motion blur when it is being used so the experience is similar.
Coming from someone who plays on both console and PC, the biggest advantage a console gives is that it allows you to comfortably turn on your console and boot up your favorite game from your sofa without having to touch a keyboard. If this new Xbox can emulate that experience then it will not be a concern.
The main thing to worry about is throughout this generation if I were to use a basket ball analogy, the Xbox hardware team or developers has given Microsoft the alley-oop but Microsoft always fails to do the slam dunk. It is likely something like that will continue into next gen.
I've had many rigs in the past and still have a capable gaming rig I think that concept of PC gaming being streamlined isn't entirely accurate.
You absolutely do need to do some config work to get the most out of your system.
This whole take of PC is a streamlined experience just isn't true in the last three decades of gaming on PC it's gotten easier but it's not streamlind like a console is.
Effectively you're paying for a no touch experience on consoles you pay because you want someone to manage the OS and updates and infrastructure everything to the point where you just have to buy a game and play
If it looks like a duck and it sounds like a duck....
It's a PC with Xbox branding.
I agree, but it's custom built, and AMD and MS are working closely for a custom GPU...done correctly and they can make it feel like a hybrid, a balance blend of Consoles ease of use, with some PC Versatility, they have been working hard on the Xbox overlay experience.
Also, they need to have some sort of automation going on for people who don't wanna deal with ANY PC processes, no switching overlay, no toggling of graphics, ect.
thw no paywall is great, however, its the rest that is shit.
like whos gonna pay over 1k of money? especially in times like these.
According to Jez Cordon who lies about everything, every time their is some bad Xbox news he comes up with some fantastic new leak about some amazing hardware
It's by design. He is a useful idiot. People at Xbox FEED him these leaks on purpose.
Jez in a nutshell really. Once negative news hits that Microsoft can't contain. Microsoft feed him some positive news to try and combat the earlier negative news it happens every time.
This exactly, what I've been saying about him. People don't find it strange that this article pops up, just has Halo is announced for PS5.
Let's not forget it's the same company that tried to introduce payed multiplayer to PC gaming in the mid to late 2000s
As far as official statements & leaks are telling, PS6 is going to be the more sophisticated approach in hardware specs, as well as the Amethyst pipelines in close collab with AMD, with probably another powerful SSD inhouse tech and improved Tempest 3D audio.
Drilled for cost reduction and low power consumption.
Whereas Xbox Next is shaping up to be a power APU right from the catalogue of AMD, mixed with Windows and an Xbox environment to run Xbox games.
I can't imagine PS6 will cost more than 699 at maximum. Whereas Xbox Next is said to range from 1000-1500.
Just looking at "that paper", I personally am far more interested in what Sony's cooking. Even if Xbox Next should produce 30% higher frames.
You people are dense asf, Jezz leaks stuff whenever, it's not always in the face of bad news, he does it for upcoming shows, unannounced games, and sometimes just in general.
It's just that there HAS been a lot of negative press surrounding MS recently, so when he says something it's around already bad press going around lol.
Lay of the conspiracy theories people...there is no console wars anymore, MS lost, it's over, let it die. MS will survive and even be profitable in their new/forced endeavor of games on all platforms while having its own hardware.
"[...] and even be profitable ..."
Seriously, no ripping:
I'm looking forward to the portion where they unfold the mystery about how Microsoft Gaming Division will be able to earn revenue out of 3rd party software sales.
IF they allow Steam, Epic, GOG, etc.
The Xbox consoles so far earned them a solid 30% share every (!) time a game was sold. Even from microtransactions. Because it all went through Xbox Store.
I am really looking forward to footnotes of their new "openess".
dveio,
It will be interesting to see how much, but there is a bigger picture than just steam, epic ect...there is GP, there is individual full price sales from PlayStation and Nintendo, as well as the cut from any other store front, then we have their store front.
For example, if Halo sells 2 mill on PlayStation, 3 mill on steam, and 1 mill on Xbox, and GP subs, they still get a cut of MTX on all platforms, it eventually turns into profits, even if it was less profit per sale, the way, way larger unit sales , and keeping people in the ecosystem of Xbox games, turns into more profit than just Xbox and PC..and when more of these games hit Nintendo platforms it will be a lot, lot more unit sales.
Money coming in on different scales instead of the much lower unit sales vs higher cuts, actually will see more profit and retention, and hanging around MS games in general.
It's like the movie, King of NY, "if a nickle bag is sold in the park, I want in"
"For example, if Halo sells“
Please, stick to my question. Only one time.
I was clearly talking about 3rd party software. Halo is a 1st party game. So it's obvious they'll earn money from games THEY publish.
But what about 3rd party games sold through Steam, Epic, GOG?
You know - 3rd party. The biggest portion of revenue for consoles.
dveio, my apologies, I missed that was your overall question..I was not trying to avoid it.
But onto the question, MS does not currently make 3rd part devs a crap load of money, most of that comes from them paying devs for games on GP, including PC GP...they will also still have their storefront for the 25-30 million console users(enough to get most devs to port their game to Xbox), they get each gen, then they seem to be going the Nintendo route and relying mostly on their IP to make the bread and butter....they have over 40 game developer selling their games on every platform with a screen.
So to flat out answer the question, they won't be relying on 3rd party games to make the bulk of their money, but there will still be 3rd party games...I think they are hoping to leverage GP/PC GP, their 40+ game devs, their dedicated box, while selling every game they make on every system, including the super high selling PlayStation and Switch.
@software
No worries, apology accepted (but wasn't needed).
To sum my reaction up:
I fundamentally disagree with you.
The portion of 3rd party software that's being released over the course of a systems lifecycle, surpasses the quantity of 1st games by far.
Despite XGS now owning 26 former 3rd party IPs - to which I absolutely, with no hesitation whatsoever, highly (!) doubt that Microsoft is going to open up development cycles for even 10 of those IPs. They won't.
Because it takes time, employees, studios and patience.
Lately, Microsoft is getting rid of all of those. For the benefit of gaining money.
And then: you're right! Game Pass. The multi billion dollar program + Play Anywhere (which is the same!) for 3rd party software.
UNLESS Microsoft won't just open the money suitcase until its empty (which will likely never happen), I don't see the current (!) Xbox strategy surviving another 3-5 years.
Financially. It's only getting worse for them. They can bump subscription and hardware prices as much as they want - which again only makes it even more worse.
They should have stuck to a 500-600 USD home console with great games.
That's my firm belief. They will have themselves fail again.
The console wars are never gonna die here because they don't want Microsoft having anything to do with gaming whatsoever. Personally, I like what theyre doing as far as putting games on other platforms. Nowadays I think its the smart thing to do because their hardware aren't doing the numbers they hoped for but still supporting the consoles that are out there. You can still have success even if you dont sell 80 to 100 million consoles.
I think everyone just wants them to rip the bad aid off and stop playing these weird half in half out games
What kind of person has a picture of themselves after a weight lifting pump-up on a gaming website? Not only that, but on your profile, you even have a background pic of yourself? Not only that, you forced the picture sideways so people can see you in full? Who does that? You're something else... yeesh
You calling everyone dense? Wow. Maybe you should look at yourself. You don't know a damn thing about Jez and his leaks. You're just speculating like the rest of us.
Occam's razor. What's the most likely scenario?
Someone high up in Microsoft is going behind everyone's back and secretly leaking information to Jez, at the risk of his or her own job? OR... People at MS are purposely leaking info to him because they want to control the narrative and in some cases 'test the waters' on controversial decisions? Maybe even to lighten the inital shock of an announcement by letting him leak a "rumor" and then the real news comes out later and the inital shock isn't anywhere near as bad?
My money is on the latter.
Haha, but do you like the pics tho?
No for real, are they good? Tell me the truth, I can take it!! And yes, I am pretty Dense..also, no one is obligated to look at my profile, or my pics..I never, ever go to anyone on here profile...I'm glad my comment was good enough for you to check me out.
Hahaha, I never claimed to know anything, I said the same thing you did except you made it a conspiracy, and spoke without any proof or anything substantial liking your theory. all I said is that Jezz releases gaming leaks at different times, (FACT) not only when MS goofs up...I also said they have been goofing up a lot(FACT) so that is why it may seems that way to some lol.
and yes, sometimes leakers are just that, leakers, people who may have inside knowledge, and may even sell the info, ..all leaks are not sponsored by X company, so that is where your point becomes conspiracy, rather than logical deductions.. because there is not 1 Fact in your entire conspiracy.
You look great my man.
There is not 1 single fact in your initial assessment of Jez and his "leaks". My point stands. Everyone is just speculating, including you. Also, I never implied anything I was saying about Jez as "fact". I provided 2 scenarios and stated that I believe one of them is more likely to be true. Obviously none of us know the real truth but that's what gamers do in forums, we chat about shit.
There is zero chance a new Xbox supports multiple storefronts. Support for steam instantly kills the Microsoft/xbox store.
Also mass market devices simply cannot support older pc titles. Imagine ‘little jimmy’ downloading an older pc title for his shiny new Xbox on Xmas morning only to be met with keyboard and mouse button prompts that he can’t find on his controller.
Never going to happen.
Man… I might bite. I have a decent Steam library and not really wanting to spend the cheddar to upgrade. This might work better for me depending on cost.
Oh, it's Jez Corden article? Better take everything with a grain of salt from him. This guy's articles seem to pop when Microsoft is doing terrible with the Xbox brand.
Im looking foward to it. I hope they add some cool features like they did with series x. Please keep that quick resume for next gen.
If Sony is smart they will stop porting Playstation games to PC. This is Microsofts backdoor to getting their games.
Thats not a good reason to stop porting games to PC. Lose out on millions just because of petty stuff. Most games are on PC anyway. Sony needs to continue doing that. Put your games on many platforms as you can.
Thats a publishers strategy, not a platform holders. I guarantee you if the next Xbox can play Playstation games, Sony will find a different strategy.
“Bold” isn’t the word I’d choose.
Boldness and stupidity are often differentiated with time, but I think we already know how this cookie will crumble.
Steam Sales will erode Game Pass’ value, and people still want a console for around $500, simple as that.
Our current console generation suffered massively due to the pandemic, it honestly feels like we're only like 2 - 3 years into even though it's been like 5.
I feel like we shouldn't even start hearing about another generation until like early 2027.
Many insiders say a $1200 dollars device. It could be more than that.
Since Rog Ally Xbox only did 1000 units sold in Spain first week, I would say this device would do less than 5 million in total lifetime.
I dont really get why i would get this Xbox pc instead of an ordinary pc. I have a hard time seeing this selling better than Xbox Serie X/S.
Might be alone here but I've always wished consoles had a more upgradeable aspect. Id have definitely stuck a better CPU to improve frame rates for instance. The issue is still keeping it the ease of use console system.
A non-upgradable PC running Windows. What could go wrong. It’s going to be pretty sad losing dedicated console optimization. Maybe SEGA will decide to return to the market once Microsoft abandons the space.
console ' exclusives' are antiquated. They deliberately left that part out of the title but it is in the article.
No paywall coming from Microsoft. Ok so what's the catch? Nothing is ever free with out the hidden strings. Especially when it comes to a big company that loves the smell of money.
If this future PC system that can play original OEM Xbox games is true and it is priced right it's going to be a fantastic opportunity for people to get into the PC market. Hopefully Microsoft does not screw this up
I swear, the ONLY competent department over at Xbox is the hardware engineers. The top brass, developers, marketing, et. al, all have their head up their ass and are high on their own farts.
There's an old meme of a Man Utd manager at his desk, smiling. A quote beneath reads "I have no idea what I'm doing".
I could easily replace that guy and logo with Microsoft
They always wanted you on Windows. That was the original goal. They never cared about consoles or video games. Xbox fans will eat it up

Former PlayStation exec Shuhei Yoshida believes Sony "cannot do the same thing they have been doing" with PS6.
They may have a dual option.
Handheld and a console. I don’t want a handheld with no physical. It’s not just about lighting and graphics.
Idk. Where was everyone when the vita existed? I don't think sony should ever do both a handheld and console at the same time again. If they were to do both, that'd mean 2 separate platforms to support and time and money wasted on working on 2 different platforms as obviously the handheld version would need downgrades and work meaningblonger dev times for both 1st and 3rd party devs, the handheld version will be given less priority.
And no way will the handheld be cheap if it will play ps6 games. Don't be surprised and look the other way if the handheld is $600+ and plays ps6 games at a much lower quality. Ya better be there day one...
If Switch 2 can somewhat handle most modern games then Sony can surely handle a new portable with ease that's integrated and bc into the ps4/5/6 ecosystem . I highly doubt ps6 is gonna push the bounds what gaming is already capable of let alone most developers but more so how we play our games (I think tech has mastered the art of peachfuzz by now lol) . With that said technology is exponentially getting smaller and more efficient that the power of a console and handheld is gonna get blurred that the only difference is a preference of features .
Honestly I'm cool with my ps5 , it fixed the slow loading gripe I had with my ps4 but if ps6 is just more framerates, ray tracing and AI I'll pass ..... but a handheld that I can play my already existing library on I'm sold .. play GTA6 on the go LET"S GO
Im not sure if VR is a separate platform or an enhancement to console. They hardly even supported it. I share your apprehension to a separate handheld given how little support they give to things that aren’t the main console. Even that this gen was a bit weak.
Nah, we don't want them to get complacent. That will not force them to innovate and capitalize on their market share. They also don't need to make stupid decisions to turn more gamers away from consoles.
Whatever they do I hope it’s innovative to where it’s not just a gimmick. They have made good progress with their controllers. The PS5 Dualsense was one of my favorite interactions this generation when playing games. Also the 3D audio playing games on my headset was very immersive.
They made good with the hardware and new features but my only complaint this gen was the games were so spaced out and we had fewer first party entries compared to other generations.
They want perfection and I’m all supportive for that. If they can cut the development time next gen that to me would be the biggest achievement.
Agreed. I don't know how much more they can pack into that controller at this point lol.
If I were them I'd try to sway more PC gamers by putting in Steam-style input mapping capabilities and require K/M support on all new games. Maybe tweak gyro aiming to close the skill gap between controller and k/m?
I agree 100% graphics CAN improve but there's not much room for improvement, focus should be added to things like physics, interactivity, AI (as in npc behavior) and optimization. The fact that PS3/360 has just about every best example of interactivity, physics and destruction is sad.
Hopefully their market lead allows them to take innovation risks with the ps6, and hopefully they also work out as expected.
In addition to the new tech announced (Neural Arrays, Radiance Cores, Universal Compression), Sony would definitely need to develop titles specifically keyed to showcasing what these new improvements can accomplish onscreen. And don't waste time and resources trying to develop the same game for PS5/PS5P. They need to give people a clear and definitive reason for wanting to invest in a new generational console.
I'd rather they postpone this talk about PS6 for later. Focus on PS5 first. It needs more exclusives.
Nah, this gen is a wash, I'd be frustrated if they delay next gen just to say they released some arbitrary amount of exclusives on ps5. Move on and move forward, embrace next gen right away like they used to so we immediately see why we should be buying into it instead of being cross gen for years
Sony will keep doing the PS model because it works. I hope they find a way to keep the price down as much as possible.
Sony brass know they can't have exclusive games and prolong their traditional gaming market with development costs as high as they are. Consoles are in a nasty place right now... Costs going UP mid Gen, very little risk.... Remakes as their anchor throughout the Gen. Just terrible... If not for 3rd party games, Sony offered very little compelling software. Service fees also just really gouge gamers to bits.
I think what Sony may do is pivot to a more Nintendo approach. Less powerful tech, less expensive game development so they can retain ip like Nintendo does.... Otherwise, ps6 is the easiest skip in history. Ps5 will get every game at a much better price and will play games perfectly fine.













Sony's quiet because they're in the lead. They know they don't have to say or do anything just yet. Xbox had a poor performance this gen. They need to openly make moves and discuss next gen in order to change brand perception before next gen starts.
I would assume it's because running your mouth early is not an advantage in this industry. Sony can now hear what MS is doing and either carry on or decide to tweak their strategy accordingly. Given that this is MS we're talking about, they will probably go with the former, but it still gives them a leg up that MS doesn't have. Also, is there a rule that a company needs to talk about what it's planning? I get that we live in an age of instant gratification, but just because a lot of people post their whole life story on Facebook and Twitter doesn't mean corporations are obligated to do so. They can announce stuff when they see fit, but it's a perfectly valid decision if they choose not to spill everything, especially not this far in advance.
Sony let’s their actions speak for themselves. They have nothing to prove since people know their console will provide most of the year’s best games on it once again
The leaks about MS have been been pretty much the same just reported constantly by different sites.
We know that the rumor is a discless cheap Xbox One S, a probable new redesign of the Xbox One S that will make it cheaper to manufacture. And then we have the obvious next gen Xbox and a next gen higher end model.
Then on Sony basically just that a PS5 is in the works. And more than likely (speculation on my end) a higher end PS5 also.
Quiet = true plans