310°

Sony’s E3 Format Really Let Them Down

Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "By all accounts Sony should have had a slam dunk at E3 2018. Their games were first in the class, with major titles coming from both their first party studios and third-party partners, many of which are some of the most anticipated games of our time. Yet, the dropped the ball – with a E3 showcase that failed to live up to not only their own previous presentations but also made some of the biggest games of all of E3 feel like afterthoughts, thrown in just to fill in the time till it was time to move onto the next thing. So while Sony had a lot to show, they did so in probably the worst way possible."

Read Full Story >>
link-cable.com
DarkVoyager2868d ago

Great games showing but horrible execution. They need to go back to the previous E3 format.

Chaosdreams2868d ago

100% agreed. That or somehow find a way to avoid a 15m intermission. It felt like watching t.v. Where the commercials kick in way to soon and stay far too long.

Sgt_Slaughter2868d ago

Apparently they were supposed to do that multiple times, but after the flack from the first time they axed it. It's probably why the conference seemed to end abruptly and shorter than their usual time

kneon2868d ago

The intermission was just weird. And it happened because they made people move from one venue to another, that just makes no sense to me.

Omnislashver362868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

Disagree entirely. I thought the presentation was masterful and it left a giant impact on me. Not only a good showing, but entirely one of the best showing of all E3s, period.

No Way2867d ago (Edited 2867d ago )

... left a giant impact on you? Oooooooooookay. It would have been cool to be there and walk to them. But from a viewers point, it was terrible to watch from home.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2867d ago
Muzikguy2868d ago

I disagree. People need to stop worrying about how things got done and just be happy they got something done. If it was the same format people would’ve been complaining about that too. What they did was fine. It was different and that’s ok. I’m glad I don’t get all riled up over such petty things

Omnislashver362868d ago

Same, this was one of the best E3s of all time in my book, no idea where they're getting this hyperbole of a terrible format. It's hipster and pedantic as all get out.

Ashlen2868d ago

I can't disagree. I don't know why they thought shuffling people from one building to another was a good idea.

And they showed good games, but they had so many more they could have shown like Concrete Genie, Spyro and Dreams.plus they had a ton of VR games they didn't show on stage.And they could have gotten a bunch of third party exclusives Kiwami 2 and Fist of the North Star on stage among others.

I'm not sure why they chose to put in such a half effort, they had way more games than they showed.

Muzikguy2868d ago

That’s a good problem not a bad one. Also, there are more shows than E3

Ashlen2868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

@Muzikguy

Those are all games they showed at E3 though.

I can understand not showing games to save for other shows. But if your going to show the games at E3 in other E3 interviews why not put it on the big stage? They can still have the developer interviews with the games, that's what they have done in the past.

Muzikguy2868d ago

E3 hasn’t been their big stage for some time now. I think they still did a decent job. Some companies save things for later instead of blowing their load all at once. (No pun intended). Maybe they could’ve done things a little better or different but it wasn’t bad and I’m not going to criticize them for it

Ashlen2868d ago

Relax man, it's constructive criticism.

The show wasn't bad, but that doesn't mean it couldn't have been better.

IamTylerDurden12868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

Sony just has a different style, the don't pad their shows like other Publishers. They feel like E3 is reserved for important games. Microsoft was at the other end of the spectrum, an hour and 39 min but they had at least 3 commercials for already released Microsoft games, a long winded Game Pass segment, and a few small games that shouldn't of made the show. Pick your poison.

Sony is a different animal and i love it. Not one time during the conference did Sony utter the words "EXCLUSIVE" nor did they boast or brag. They didn't pad the numbers or the time either. Sony operates with class and respect. Does it hurt them at times? Definitely. Do i want them to have a little more ruthlessness and crude American business strategy for their own economic benefit? Kind of. But do i still prefer their way of business over the likes of.........other companies. Without a doubt.

Muzikguy2868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

Constructive? Ok. Sounds more like you’re basing it off something you hoped it was going to be or their past shows. Not judging though 🤷🏼‍♂️

Omegasyde2868d ago

Completely agree.

No big surprises from Sony, which is Odd.

I am starting to think Sony is pushing more game announcements at PSX vs E3

Ashlen2868d ago

Huh, I guess it's true if you say anything other than Sony is the best (even when it's not actually negative) you get downvoted. Heh there is a certain site moderator who if they see this will probably fall out of their chair laughing knowing how prefer Sony...

Oh well, knock yourselves out downvote away!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2868d ago
Rude-ro2868d ago

Agreed. Luckily, with the quality of titiles that they have released, I’m not worried...
But I fully agree, go back to one stage, no “intermission” after one game showing.
I get the attempt, good for them, but let’s not repeat.
I do not think it would have been as bad if the rest of e3 was blah... but it was, and Sony’s presence of their e3 was off as well.
Plus, the sharks in the water of Microsoft’s media is looking for anything to chomp on.. do not feed the sharks Sony.

IamTylerDurden12868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

The only real problem was the intermission after TLoU. I personally enjoyed everything, i like Sid Shuman and i thought it was an innovative idea for those in attendance. But once Tsushima gameplay started it was much more consistent. Most of the second half was just rapid fire trailers. The early portion was rocky in terms of presentation style, but it settled down afterwards.

This article is ridiculous. In no way did TLoU and Ghost of Tsushima seem feel like after thoughts due to the setup of the conference. The Last of Us II and Ghost of Tsushima were the best thing shown at E3 period.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2867d ago
jaycptza2868d ago

I'm just going to say one thing and it's the only thing I care about... GAMES

chrisx2868d ago

did the games really let you down?

AspiringProGenji2868d ago

No but the show was still not good enough. They may have their reasons but still.

2868d ago
Muzikguy2868d ago (Edited 2868d ago )

Better how? They did what they wanted and it doesn’t matter. People will still find a fault

DarXyde2868d ago

I did say before that it was unlikely they would show much that would "beat" Microsoft's conference since we knew about most of the games already (though, to be fair, Nier has no effect on most people since they've already beaten it; also, personally, Ninja Theory acquisition isn't a huge deal since I've not really liked their work; I'm one of the weirdos that didn't care for Hellblade. Great studio for most, so I see the appeal). I don't think Sony needed to prove much either though. They showed gameplay for Ghost of Tsushima, The Last of Us, Part II, and Death Stranding which was what I really wanted to see. Also got to see Resident Evil 2. I think Microsoft had a better show, but I also found the most exciting aspects multiplatform. The bar was set in a different place from Sony too since they needed to prove the most. I'm not sure they did well there since most of the projects shown are available elsewhere.

yellowgerbil2868d ago

they sure did. They teased Dreams like 6 times with no payoff. The only way you constantly cut to 5 second Dreams clips between trailers is if the show was going to end with a HUGE Dreams announcement. The show should of ended with Dreams getting a damn release date and all PS+ members being able to play it immediately in a beta.
Also NONE OF THE GAMES HAD RELEASE DATES. The number one defense I've heard is well they wanted to "focus on games coming in the near future" Yet we still have no release date for TLOU, DEATH STRANDING (which is a damn walking sim now) and Ghost
The format was terrible but the content was as well

kneon2868d ago

I'd really like to know what is going on with Dreams, wasn't it shown at the PS4 announcement? We've been waiting a long time and still not much info.

yellowgerbil2868d ago

Yeah it was one of the very first games shown back at the ps4 reveal. It sold me on this gen and 5 years later am still waiting for it. They announced a beta way back in 2016 and we still just have a vague future time to experience it.

Elda2868d ago

Nope & that's what was important hands down.

Rimeskeem2868d ago

If the format is the biggest letdown then you know its a decent conference.

Relientk772868d ago

I hope they never use that format again.

Also an intermission seriously?

Rimeskeem2868d ago

The intermission was a bit weird but I'm glad that they used it for Destiny 2 and CoD so that the main focus was on exclusives.

-Foxtrot2868d ago

I don't see why in the intermission they didn't just show every single third party multiplatform trailer that was shown at Microsoft's E3 and throw some indie games in there if they needed.

Show all comments (57)
50°

Diablo 4: Lord of Hatred’s New Endgame Is All About More Freedom and Less Friction | IGN

The second expansion looks to deliver Diablo 4’s most bingeable endgame yet.

Retro198610h ago

Not gonna play this game before they stop selling cosmetics in shop that looks better than drops in-game. Stupid company

Gameseeker_Frampt8h ago

Could be worse. Path of Exile has no cosmetic drops in-game but will happily sell them to you for $30 each.

Michiel19892h ago

PoE is also free and has actual good updates every 3 months and listen the community. Combined with the fact that PoE actually is for adults instead of the cookie cutter shit you get in D4, build diversity? no ofc not, on the item it literally says for which single skill the item works for and for nothing else so you're pigeonholed into a couple very specific items if you wanna play a certain build which kills all personal builds and everyone is just running with the exact same items, compare that to PoE where there's endless viable builds.

40°
8.0

Coral Island Review 2026 | The Farming Sim That Goes Underwater | Spawning Point

Most games borrow from Stardew Valley. Coral Island earns the comparison. An Indonesian studio adds underwater coral restoration, 28 romanceable characters including merfolk royalty, and Balinese-inspired festivals. The August 2025 multiplayer update strengthened the package. The farming sim template, expanded in every direction that matters.

Read Full Story >>
spawningpoint.com
30°
6.6

Wytchwood Review 2026 | The Cosy Game That Actually Has Teeth | Spawning Point

Play a swamp witch crafting potions and solving problems with darkly comic consequences. Wytchwood's storybook art style masks a game with genuine edge. The crafting system ties directly to narrative progression rather than existing as a separate loop. Cosy but not soft. The fairy tale tradition it draws from has always had teeth.

Read Full Story >>
spawningpoint.com