All Channels
Popular
Approvals 10/3 ▼
Nyxus (3) - 3476d ago Cancel
Digital_Anomaly (3) - 3476d ago Cancel
Francis2 (2) - 3476d ago Cancel
GrapesInASalad (1) - 3476d ago Cancel
Kailios (1) - 3476d ago Cancel
90°

Will gaming ever go fully controllerless?

Taken from IM PLAYIN:

"From the mouse and keyboard to the humble pad – controllers have always been a part of our gaming experience. But with the release of PS VR, and the development of more powerful VR machines like the Rift, it does make me question if controllers will be around for much longer."

Read Full Story >>
implayin.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3476d ago
Hroach6163476d ago

God I hope not. I just want to relax on my couch sitting down to game. Plus sometimes my fingers do things in quick reaction I don't even think about. Just reflex from playing a game. Doubt that would happen with eye tracking controls or whatever they come up with to replace mouse and keyboard or controllers.

GrimmyReaper3476d ago

No. Simple as that.

We have seen it so many times and every time it's the same result.

People call x revolutionary, say it will replace the default, it doesn't and it's forgotten.

For 30 years now, we still game on screens with a box that plays games and a controller or mouse and keyboard to control them.
And that is fine. They are standards for a reason. Because they work. And I've said it before and I'll say it again.

VR goggles limit the developer and player in their game.
Nobody in their right mind will use it for competitive FPS multiplayer.

VR limits developers because now they have to work their game around these goggles rather than actually make the game fun first and foremost.
Because unless it's in first person, why use VR? Why play platformers in VR? Why play card games in VR? Why play driving games in VR? Why play puzzle games in VR unless specifically designed for VR?

Not saying VR and controller-less gaming doesn't have a market, but they will never be the standard because of simple logic.

Aenea3476d ago (Edited 3476d ago )

Your simple logic is flawed!

You said "never" and answered "no", do you still think that in 100 or 200 years we're still gaming with controllers? That we, for instance, can't use our brain to control a game? Things change, and they change rather fast, look how gaming was 30 years ago... Imagine what it is like in 30 years...

There will come a time when VR and regular gaming merge where it isn't giving anyone motion sickness anymore, where there are no controllers anymore to mess things up, that everything works flawlessly. Don't think it's gonna happen in the next 30 years, but am positive things like this won't stay the same forever...

----

As for your questions:
- have you ever tried a racing game in VR? it's fricking fantastic! feels way more natural to me!
- platformers in VR, yeah, I thought that would not be a good idea, the little robot demo game in Playroom VR for the PSVR changed all that, it works wonderfully well and every single person who tried that had the same reaction "this needs to become a full game!" and "all platformers should support VR!".

You also say VR is restricting developers, I get why you said it, but it's also giving developers new ways to do things, they need to think outside the box, they need to try things out and like with that platformer game things can suddenly work really well and surprise you!

And let's be honest, designers are kinda stuck in a rut, VR is shaking things up, they can actually be creative again and try new things, this is a good thing!

VR is here to stay and it's awesome and will only get better!

Both VR and regular flat TV gaming with a controller will eventually be replaced by something else that can give people both the VR immersion and the ease of use of regular gaming. Imagine tech that your brain thinks it's holding a controller or a real gun while in reality you are just lying down on the couch!

_-EDMIX-_3474d ago

Completely agreed.

I think it's a bit Reckless to say something like now or never especially considering no one here knows what gaming is going to be like in 100 years.

For all we know we will no longer even be using displays to experience gaming, it would simply be something that we inject with nanomachines.

Such a concept of gaming would essentially give sight to the blind..

It would give the experience of something in such a fluid natural sense that controlling in the traditional manner that we know of would be archaic and almost a joke.

I'm not trying to go on Minority Report on everyone but I'm just trying to say in some distant future the idea of gaming The Way We Know It is likely not going to be a thing and people will seriously remember this time. No different than we sort of remember Atari or ColecoVision.

Of course there's going to be remnants of that time. Because it's very likely our children will carry on what we enjoyed about this time period of gaming in there's always going to be someone that grew up in our time. That wants to create a game using the traditional or the old methods.

Do we not get simplistic puzzle games every now and then? (Like a lot).

My point is simply that no one could honestly say that gaming with a controller is something that is going to be forever because that is just absolutely ridiculous to claim.

_-EDMIX-_3474d ago

It's not really as simple as that lol.

I'm sorry but you don't know what it's going to be like 100 or even two hundred years into the future to honestly make it sound as if controllers will always be the standard for all we know we could already have some sort of er that's simply some sort of brain implant or something like that lol

You breathe something in and you chemically experience the game lol

How could you say no to a comment on a reality you know not of currently?

GrimmyReaper3474d ago

Well thankfully I'll be dead by then.

Hooking yourself up to machines to take you to a different reality because you used to enjoy just relaxing and playing games?

Matrix was considered ludicrous, now it seems people want that thing. No, not saying "Machines are taking over, get your tin foil hat". But if we get to that level, we really have failed then.

And I love the excuse always. "You just haven't tried VR yet." All three and if that is the way gaming will go? Just no.
What happened to just playing a game? What happened to just having fun?

I don't wanna have motion controls forced in my games just because "immersion".
I don't wanna have some goggles in my face just to game.
I don't wanna have a big setup and create over excessive room just to play.

And counterargument. How can people say yes on a reality they not know currently off. I based my conclusion on what I've seen and what I hear. Besides a few people online (and even then, more and more are changing their opinion) VR is just tech. Something that will be used for inferior games to show off VR because YES! VR DOES limit everyone in the process.

OT
I never said driving in VR isn't more immersive but a person driving in VR will always be worse at driving than someone behind the car, simply because their field of view isn't limited to the driver's seat, netting the person not using VR to have far better awareness of their surrounding. And if they DO change the camera in VR to go behind the car, then again. What is the point of VR? Same applies for any game.

And gaming changed so much in 30 years? How? Everything is indeed more detailed and I am sometimes blown away what devs can do, but even after 30 years, we still play on screens, with controllers or mouse and keyboard. Again, standards because they function. They work.

zerocarnage3476d ago

I don't want it to, the option should always be there and it does not hurt to ha e those features in place x

Show all comments (15)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7d ago
Changed: credit url
Jin_Sakai8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio7d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing7d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster927d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit7d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing7d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster927d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
60°

Steam Controller (2026) review

Second time's the charm.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community8d ago
Changed: title
Christopher10d ago
cl19838d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Seams like a nice controller

Reaper22_8d ago

Two analog sticks acrossvftom each other is a no go.When will everyone learn.

30°
9.0

Forefront VR Review - Battlefield Comes to VR — and it Actually Works | Terminal Gamer

TG writes: If you’ve ever wanted that chaotic, large-scale modern warfare feeling from Battlefield but in full VR immersion, Forefront delivers it better than anything else currently available on Quest.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community9d ago