Approvals 11/3 ▼
SwiffEpics (2) - 3377d ago Cancel
ian86 (3) - 3377d ago Cancel
TechRaptor (3) - 3377d ago Cancel
Overload (3) - 3377d ago Cancel
990°

What Is Rockstar's Problem With PC Gaming?

ScreenGurus Shaun asks why PC gamers are yet again being left out of the Rockstar party with upcoming Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
screengurus.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3377d ago
Changed: title
Shaun2k53377d ago
Eonjay3377d ago

Because it doesn't make them any money. Consoles make money for these guys.

TheOptimist3377d ago

Are you living in 2010? Because I would have agreed with you back then

Red_Renegade3377d ago

with some of the crazy stuff you say, he's prolly okay with you not agreeing. if rockstar doesn't wanna make a pc game, that's up to them.

2pacalypsenow3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

If it was such a huge money maker for them, they would release on PC. I'm sure they will release it later. They are just focusing on consoles for now just like GTA5

TheOptimist3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

Umm... I don't mind skipping RDR, but saying that PC doesn't turn profits is downright bs today. As I said I would have agreed back in 2010, definitely not today. Because even if it doesn't make as much profit as the consoles, I'm pretty sure it is significant enough to give competition and it definitely has more profit than Xbox if sales alone ae to be considered.
@morganfell
Thanks for letting me know something which I knew and of course deviating from the topic, since it's about profit, whether Y or 2Y, they are businessmen, and they'll go behind every profit they can get their hands on

morganfell3377d ago

@TheOptimist,

Since you have access to the development costs for PC for Rockstar as well as the cost incurred for troubleshooting PC issues, associate profit margins, projected profits for reallocation of assets, please share this treasure trove of insight.

FACT: You have no idea of the cost incurred on Rockstar for a PC version. And it isn't just cost for the PC. If they allocate X amount of resources for a PC version they make Y amount of dollars. But if instead they allocate X amount of resources back to the console version they make Y x 2 amount of dollars. These are matters to which neither you nor I are privy. I grant the benefit of the doubt that Sam and Dan Houser understand their situation far better than you or I.

JackBNimble3377d ago

TheOptimist
I guess you're just going to have to wait for a port of the game

Cindy-rella3377d ago

Im a pc gamer as well and it puzzles me to see other avid pc gamers being stunned as to why certain development studios would rather have their games on console first then pc or just consoles.

fr0sty3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

Rockstar agrees with Eonjay. They are in the business of making money. If there were money to make in the PC space that would make the development efforts of releasing on PC worth it, Take 2 would make them release a PC port. Obviously the ends do not justify the means for them, because they have chosen not to do it. They are not going to ignore a chance to make millions of dollars if it is really worth it in the end.

starchild3377d ago

You console fanboys are ridiculous. You aren't gamers. All you do is hate on PC, hate on Nintendo, hate on the other console brand...that's all you do. You never defend what's good regardless of platform, nor do you stand up for what's right for gamers in general. You're nothing but corporate cheerleaders.

Kingthrash3603377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

Starchild....relax.
I'm sure you'll get it after console gamers have been playing it for years.
Pc has several factors that make them not want to focus on them first.
Like gta, they will sell it console let it make money then develop red dead pc if it sells enough. You gotta remember red dead isn't as mainstream as gta is. They know what to do. They are letting it pay for itself. That would be my guess.

Not feeling so master race right now tho huh.

IGiveHugs2NakedWomen3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

The problem with PC gaming?

PIRATING and CHEATING

RedSoakedSponge3376d ago

@TheOptimist

Just be optimistic dude ;)

3376d ago
DarkZane3376d ago

It's not that PC doesn't make them money, it's that console versions make them a lot more money, so those take priority.

BG115793376d ago

If it isn't money, then what reason would the have ?
Seriously, which other reason would they have ?

RosweeSon3376d ago

Indeed they go for Profit, where are the profits in Piracy, oh there are none.

THRASHMOUTH3376d ago

You're also forgetting the fact that Rockstar generates killer profit from microtransactions on consoles. I highly doubt PC players are a fraction of that revenue

Obscure_Observer3375d ago

@Kingtrash360

That was low. Even for you. You're pretty much everything Starchild stated above.

When comes to Scorpio you said "why buy a Scorpio if you can build a PC?". And now this?

You spit on disappointed PC gamers's faces?

Looks like the ROTR exclusive BS hasn't teach you nothing.

But fear not. Tomorrow is another day. What comes around, goes around. ;)

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3375d ago
OoglyBoogly3377d ago

http://steamspy.com/app/271...

Just on Steam alone there's well over 5 million owners of GTA 5 for PC. PC, hardly, is a loss for them in any way shape or form.

So yeah, no.

Eonjay3377d ago

http://i.imgur.com/cEQuwdr....

So it looks like your are a misinformed, or you don't have insight into the volume that console push. Like 5 million means anything to a R* lol! Either way, please look at this and tell me where the hell the money is. What should you be doing as a AAA developer right now. Focusing on PC? No, because you and your team deserve to receive return on your development costs.

AnotherProGamer3377d ago

The money they make on consoles is significantly higher though

http://i.imgur.com/mD05lD4l...

TheOptimist3377d ago

@Eonjay
You do realize that that list includes PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One- 4 platforms. Also let's not forget the delay- On PS3 it has been out for 3 years, on PS4 for 2 years and PC for 1 and a half year. So yeah all platforms plus time delay play a huge role

Agent-863377d ago

@Eonjay and AnotherProGamer
That graph you link to is not very informative. First, it shows no monetary values on the left axis except for $0M on the bottom. What are the values for the middle and top of the graph? It shows no incremental values. Second, the title of the graph is "Additional Content Revenue". That sounds like DLC to me and not actual game sales/revenue. Of course, PC gamers have mods and DLC sales will be lower on that platform.

Also, as other people have pointed out, the console figure includes 4 platforms (PS3, PS4, Xbox360 and Xbox1) which all had their own development costs and revenue produced. To have an accurate comparison, we would need to have game sales/revenues for all 5 platforms on an individual basis. In a fair comparison, I believe the PC platform would compare very favorably. 5 million plus sales on a single platform is pretty damn strong.

devileyed3377d ago

Both MS and Sony take around 45% of game sales and steam takes 15%-30% depending on the arrangement so I wonder how much money they really make between the two .

Vegamyster3377d ago

@AnotherProGamer

Red Dead R2 will only out on the PS4 & Xone, if you compare just the PS4 & Xone sales of GTAV to PC:

PS4: 11.94m
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...

Xone: 5.06m
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...

PC: 6.4m (Also came out 6 months later)
http://steamspy.com/app/271...
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...

iloveallgames3377d ago

@eonjay
Superdata doesn't have access to any of steam's sales data, you are looking at physical copy only for PC.

XanderZane3377d ago

Yeah but on game consoles...
"Within 24 hours of its release, Grand Theft Auto V generated more than $800 million in worldwide revenue, equating to approximately 11.21 million copies sold for Take Two.
As of 31 December 2014, the game has shipped 45 million copies to retailers, including 10 million copies of the re-released version for eighth-generation consoles.
As of 18 May 2016, the game has shipped over 65 million copies across all platforms."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

Almost 60 million sold on game consoles. As I said, Rockstar knows where the money is coming from. RDR sold over 12 million on game consoles.

hiredhelp3376d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

You forgot the numbers that sold on pc from R*warhouse for pc players digital code plus legit cdkey sites adds up to nearly double.
So you kids saying that No cos more cost effectiv and make more on consoles ... Its true your right But PC numbers has doubles in past 2-3 years with more people from consoles have bought or built themselvs a pc too sales have risen.
If R* felt PC wasnt viable why are the same devs that put GTAV that doing red dead do all versions of gta on pc LA nore pc midnight club racing pc list grows.
3rd party devs in tidays industry use engines that are able to put game on all formats if needed.
But yeh consoles will be first they did miss us first RD but im confidant sane mistake wont be made.
Agree or dusagree :) I dont care kiddies.

krazeecain3376d ago

@Eonjay @AnotherProGamer SO?! That's well over $250 million. It does NOT cost that much to port to PC, and is a HUGE amount of money regardless of what you're making elsewhere. Also keep in mind that the PC version came way, WAY after the first release on last gen console. The fact that they still sold 5 million copies is amazing.

Rockstar is clearly being incentivized somehow to delay or eschew the PC releases of their game. Their excuses for doing so don't make any sense in the context of other publishers.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3376d ago
ShadowKnight3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

The more the platforms it's on the more profit they'll make. I hope it does come to PC in native 4K 60fps it would be nice, but if not oh well got the console to play it on.

Eonjay3377d ago

Oh I think it will but first you focus on where the big bucks are. Remember they said that GTA 5 cost something liek 250 million to make. You can only get the money back on consoles. PCs will have you bankrupt spending that kind of money.

_-EDMIX-_3377d ago

Yes but it does not need to be day 1.

consider that they could still release it on PC after the fact, Rockstar just doesn't see a reason to be developing on 3 platforms concurrently.

kneon3376d ago

Not necessarily, it depends on the costs associated with supporting another platform vs the potential revenue. Many PC gamers wait for a steam sale before buying, so I expect the average selling price on PC could be much lower than on consoles.

Kurdishcurse3376d ago

there will never be a native 4k game on the pro. people need to accept this. either way, since my ps4 has been degrading in performance, ill be getting a pro very soon. ive heard itll have higher frame stability. bloodborne killed me with ita fps drops. hopefully similar issues in games will be adressed in the pro.

shauzy3376d ago

how does it come to pc in "native 4k 60fps"

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3376d ago
annoyedgamer3377d ago

CD Project Red would like to have a word with you.

_-EDMIX-_3377d ago

Because their game cost more?

kevnb3377d ago

I feel like they think they double dip when they delay the pc version.

starchild3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

That's exactly it. They want to release it on PS4 and XB1 and then later release it on PC, PS5, etc. They did that with GTA5 and it resulted in a lot of people double dipping.

It's a terrible business practice. If they're going to screw PC gamers, unlike the other 99.9% of developers, then they don't deserve my money and I won't be buying their games on my consoles either.

Nathan_Hale533376d ago

Sad you are getting dislikes Starchild. It is true. Expecting double or even triple dipping is immoral and anti-consumer. It is also true what you said on a comment up. A lot of console gamers are so anti-gaming and are overly loyal to their console of choice. All they do is hate.

Mr_Writer853376d ago

@starchild

Then just wait?

If you double dip and then cry about it you are a moron.

There is nothing wrong with double dipping, you have no right to dictate to anyone how they spend their money.

Either just buy it on console, or wait.

And it's not like R* would half arse the port, you will be getting THE best version of the game.

Sure other develop on all 3 but how many of those games run as best they can Day 1 without any patches needed?

I see The Witcher 3 mentioned, yet it was a mess on consoles compared to PC and has needed several big patches to improve performance.

Look at Arkham Knight what a buggy mess that was on PC.

I'd rather wait and have the best possible version for my console of choice then a buggy mess.

Surely selling customers a buggy mess of a game and fixing it later is more anti consumer than double dipping?

Eamon3377d ago

The real reason why is because Rockstar doesn't want to make a simple port. As with GTA IV and GTA V, they develop PC versions that are optimized for different hardware and for user-created content i.e. mods.

Also, they focus on console versions first to make the most amount of sales possible before releasing a PC version. After all, loads of people (inc myself) have bought GTA on console before buying it again on PC. That's a double sell. They know it happens because that's how madly popular GTA and Rockstar are.

In the end, it's about releasing a great product while maximizing profit. I predict that a RDR1 remaster will be announced shortly and it will come to PC.

Psychotica3377d ago

So when I bought GTA V for the PC it was at cost?

XanderZane3377d ago

Rockstar probably see most PC gamers are a bunch of pirates. I'm pretty sure they know where their biggest fans are and it's definitely on game consoles. Just because Rockstar allowed RDR to be B/C on the XB1 it caused sales of the "Red Dead Redemption - Game of the Year Edition" game to increase by 6000%. That was just on one platform.
http://www.gamespot.com/art...
Rockstar knows they will sell millions of copies of this game on game consoles with minimal pirating.

Gravesinger_3376d ago

PC gamer here, with over a thousnad dollars in PC games across Steam, GoG, Origin, Battle,net and Uplay, Can you back up your "Rockstar probably see most PC gamers are a bunch of pirates." statement with evidence? If not, please kindly sit down and SHUT THE HELL UP. Cheers.

ONESHOTV23376d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

really now i own over 400+ games from stream- origins -GOG and uplay- battlenet and i have never pirated and game and it's a good thing i work for my money so i can buy whatever console pushes the best graphics if there are no pc version so what am i as a pc gamer missing out on ? and let me tell you i own red dead redemption on the ps3 but i have never put the disk in my ps3 becuase well i had better things to play and i wasnt hyped in wanting to play it in the first place. if anyone wants proof i can put in the disk right now so it registers on my account becuase i know you people on this site

XanderZane3376d ago

@WhereIsYourGodNow
It's pretty much a know fact that games are pirated more on PC platform then any other in the entire world. Don't really need any evidence. But if you want a little proof about the subject, here you go. http://www.pcgamer.com/the-...
Next time do some research before opening your mouth.

@ONESHOTV2
That's nice. You're one of the 10-15% who doesn't/. Congrats. Meantime little Johnny down the street has over 500 games from Torrent on his PC that were pirated. For every one of you, there are 10 other PC gamers pirating the same games you own.

2600Thunder3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

That's not at all true; if you google around at their sales on a year LATE release of GTA V and GTA Online for PC you'll see the masses in profits they made and continue to make on residual online sales. I purchased it for the 360, then PS4, then PC and have been glad to do it with the high amount of content they gave us. I am assuming they are going to do this again so fans who own and want it on PC will buy it twice or more like me.

I am a PC gamer so it's ok with me, and as I said, if they keep the great content coming and don't chop RDR2 to bits like every EA game, then I am happy to support them. They are one publisher worth paying extra. However, I said the same about Bethesda, so we'll see.

For now, EA could use a spanking from RS.

_-EDMIX-_3377d ago

I wouldn't say all that because they wouldn't be porting all their titles to PC if that was the case, I would say it's simply because it cost them too much money to develop on so many platforms.

if they're not getting the same ratio in regards to profit it might make more sense for them to just bring it to the platform after the fact , then development concurrently considering their games are already massive and extremely expensive to develop in the first place adding another platform just raises the cost unnecessarily.

Erik73573377d ago

Your an idiot, gta 5 sold 5 million units. Yea thats not a lot compared to the rest of console sales but ITS STILL 5 MILLION. That's STILL a lot of money.

Antifan3377d ago

Its more of a technical reason than it is about money. PC is a open system, so R*`s whole virtual online economy could be exploitable by mods.

Nathan_Hale533376d ago

Numbers say otherwise. Steam alone sold 6 million copies not including other means of buying the game, and Steam sells shark cards. Let's say steam takes 12% of the cut of $360,000,000. That is still $318,000,000 made from Steam alone. That is a helluva lot of money.
If GTA sold on PC along side of console, the number would probably be bigger as some people don't want to buy the same game twice or three times. I believe the choice is anti-consumer.

N311V3376d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

It's not just these guys. Consoles typically account for about 95% of all game sales. For example, NPD reported the follow values for retail and digital game sales in North America (August 2016);

Console Software $273.7 million
PC game software $14.2 million

http://venturebeat.com/2016...

This knowledge helped me understand why PC ports are often poor quality as well.

Nivekki3376d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

Your knowledge is skewed.That doesn't include data from Origin or Blizzard.net, two of the biggest outlets for pc gaming. One of the biggest games for pc at the moment, Overwatch, is not given a look in. I'm not saying pc gaming would overshadow console gaming if that information is known, but at the end of the day it means that data doesn't hold water. NPD data as well isn't all that accurate, they don't have the information for everything as much as a lot of people believe. A good percentage of it they make up.

And there's also the fact that North America doesn't equal the world.

There's this little game you might have heard about which is League of Legends, that's quite popular in places that aren't called America.

Orionsangel3376d ago

I think it's because of all the pirating in PC gaming.

lelo2play3376d ago

Consoles always give Rockstar more money so obviously their priority will always be console version of the game. Like or not, that's the simple truth. PC version of Red Dead Redemption 2 might arrive later on.

Now ... claiming that the PC version doesn't make them any money is just plain stupid. GTA5 says hi.

RosweeSon3376d ago

Exactly release on a system where people pay... as it should be or release on a platform where a vast majority will just help themselves to a free copy they only got themselves to blame don't pirate so many games on PC and a developer might see it as financially viable to spend their money bringing their products to PC.

3376d ago
+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3375d ago
Iceball20003377d ago

I think it's cause they would rather optimize for 2 devices instead. Then when they got free time make a PC version like they did with GTA. There's a lot more to optimize when on PC.

crazychris41243377d ago

But there are now 5 maybe even 6 platforms now. PS4 & Pro, X1 and Scorpio, PC and maybe even the NX. Plus GTA 5 has over 5.6 million owners so there is definitely money in the PC market.

Red_Renegade3377d ago

it's not gonna be on everything. they already said ps4 and xbox. pro and scorpio might not even happen.

TheOptimist3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

Don't forget that is the number in spite of a year and a half delay. If Rockstar had released the PC version along with the prev gen console versions, then I wouldn't be surprised to see that number at around 12 million (THat initial hype for the game was mind numbing)
Though I can't complain because the PC version just runs like a dream

2pacalypsenow3377d ago

Ps4 and Pro are the same console one just optimized with better hardware, there will not be Ps4 and Ps4Pro games, it will be the game packaging with the features unlocked if you have a Pro, no need to double dip.

Aenea3377d ago

@Red_Renegade

Sony has made it mandatory for every game releasing from late September this year to include a Pro mode. So yes, a PS4 Pro version is happening and am sure a Scorpio one is too...

GrimmyReaper3377d ago

Except, the situation is the same as GTA V
PS4 and PS4 Pro
XBO and Scorpio
PC
If NX would get it, it would have shown on the page, just like that Sonic trailer

TheUndertaker853377d ago

They won't bother optimizing for Pro. Scorpio is still a year away. Rockstar likely won't bother with NX as Rockstar really doesn't bother with Nintendo. Having shipped over 65 million copies 5 million also doesn't make a big difference.

So they've got PS4 and XOne to work on.

3377d ago
dmetripaulpavlin3376d ago

@Red_Renegade

I cannot believe how little people understand the upgrade from PS4 and XB1 to PS4 Pro and XB1 Scorpio. You simply do not have a clue about it do you? It isn't an options for Pro it. It will be on Scorpio because that's the whole fucking point of what M$ is doing, turning a console into a closed OS PC while not making it super obvious to the dumb dumbs.

Reckless_Love3376d ago

That only helps to solidify the argument though. They've spent multiple years working towards a base ps4 and XB1, so simply taking that further on a beefed up spec that isn't a radically different piece of hardware isn't going to be a large task. Working with dedicated perimeters to nurture a product can be more condusive to creating a more well realised vision.

I will find it perculiar if it doesn't arrive on PC at all however.

SoulMikeY3376d ago

Ps4 and pro are NOT separate. Everything must work on the ps4, it just gets a patch if they chose to. They will never release on Nintendo and Scorpio will probably not get anything with its timeline. Ps4 and Xbox. That's it.

SoulMikeY3376d ago

Aenea, gr8b8m8. Please post the proof. They strictly said it's UP TO THE DEVELOPER. There will not be separate games. You're buying the ps4 game with optional pro enhancements if they choose.

XanderZane3376d ago

@Red_Renegade
You must have had a long night. Go on and shut down your PC and take a nap. We'll still be here when you wake up and come to your senses.

* PS4 Pro & Scorpio version might not happen? * Maybe you forgot the /s

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3376d ago
medman3377d ago

Perhaps, but the troubling thing for pc only gamers is that Red Dead Redemption never made it's way to the pc at all.........

3376d ago
Nathan_Hale533376d ago (Edited 3375d ago )

Not really. Consoles are already on a very similar architecture to full PC's. Hell, the Xbox One uses the Windows 10 core as an OS. This is just laziness.

@totallysane
Do you know how optimizations work on PC? because they don't work like that. OS is a big part of it for it to be compatible in the first place.

totallysane3376d ago

it's not just the os they have to optimize the game for. PC's have tons of variations as far as hardware goes. consoles don't change, yet pcs can everyday. You have to optimize for the most popular setups, which sometimes isn't enough because they can't account for every setup that is being utilized.

Deadpooled3377d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

Maybe they hate the piracy?

@TheOptimist = 'When you sell your game to someone, you are basically doing paid piracy.'

I'm sorry after I saw that I had to stop reading the rest of your comment to avoid deliberately lowering my IQ.

TheOptimist3377d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

Well consoles do not have non-piracy. When you sell your game to someone, you are basically doing paid piracy.
@AKR
When you sell the game to someone else, does the developer get the money? THAT IS A BIG NO. It has a similar function to piracy on PC, just that we don't have to pay to buy a used item and we get it before many of the second hand buyers.(I don't pirate games, but back in the day when I was a kid, I knew that there would be a Day 1 working torrent).
Also if you read the Copyright terms- They do say that resale of the intellectual property of a developer for personal gain is infringement. (These are not the exact words, but you get the jist). The second hand market should actually be illegal, but it is so big that if someone tries to stop it, there would be a huge uproar.
@moegooner
I know you can't come up with any argument for that. Wow. Just Wow.
@zb1ftw
Agreed. But you can't get DLC without the game. And while it does make millions, the question still remains- Is it fair use?

starchild3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

Well, he's right. Buying a used game doesn't give any money to the game makers, it's not much better than piracy.

And quit stereotyping PC gamers. Most of us don't pirate games. Just today I bought two PC games. And I buy all of my games.

FlyingFoxy3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

@starchild i have to agree with you, there is the odd comment here that would like everyone to believe that everyone who plays on PC must pirate their games, Steam sales disprove this.

Some are also talking as if there are cheaters everywhere on PC, true it's easier to be able to cheat on PC games. But then it's also likely to get your key/account banned if playing on a secure server, meaning they have to spend money to get back in the game again.

Some people are blowing it way out of proportion, i still prefer PC because of the freedom it gives and i likely always will. Not just for gaming but for everything. I buy my games for the multiplayer, who wants to be locked out of that if they like playing online?

Red_Renegade3377d ago

that's stupid. pirating is getting a game that was never paid for. buying used is passing ownership of a game they already got money for. not even close to the same thing. honda gets no money when i sell my car. why should anybody get money when i sell my game?

AKR3377d ago

@TheOptimist and @Starchild

No, no, no, no. The selling of used games is not ANYWHERE NEAR piracy.

When you buy a game new, a profit is made on it. Selling that game to someone else doesn't equate to lost profit; that's the case for ANY used item. If it were illegal, then the second-hand market wouldn't be so big. The initial sale has already been made, case closed.

Now, if you burn a copy of the disc and sell it, THEN that can be considered piracy. Just think about it, if buying/selling used games were illegal, why would GameStop thrive on it?

zb1ftw7773376d ago

False.

The preowned market still makes millions in dlc and microtransactions.

The piracy market does not.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3376d ago
Eonjay3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

No its about money. Unless you are saying that they lose too much money on PC where it really starts to affect their rev.

AlexFili3376d ago

Rockstar is so big they could easily open up their own online store, charge £39.99 or cheaper and fans would easily pay that price. They could then get 100% of the profits for 1% of the work.

Nathan_Hale533376d ago

Maybe they hate money? 6+million sold on steam alone. Piracy isn't much of an issue as console fanboys want to say it is.

TheUndertaker853376d ago

Consoles made them over a billion dollars in three days.

http://www.guinnessworldrec...

Consoles also moved over 15 million copies in the first week. That's two platforms with PS3 & 360 as the PS4 & Xbox One versions came out later.

https://www.vg247.com/2013/...

2pacalypsenow3377d ago

They dont have to release it on PC if they dont want to.

PlayableGamez-3377d ago

That is millions of sales they are missing out on then.
They would only be hurting themselves.

ShaunCameron3377d ago

Not really. They 1st RDR never came out on PC and it didn't hurt them one bit.

seanpitt233376d ago

You pc players can keep saying how many gta5 copies have been sold on pc blah blah... At the end if the day rockstar are clearly not interested in doing a pc version at launch with the consoles or even at all they have never been a fan of the pc and you guys keep saying how much money they are going to lose. Its not going to change the fact that they will make it for consoles only and make a shit tonne of money without the hassle of pc development. If it really benefitted rockstar don't you think they would do one? Something is holding them back.

PlayableGamez-3376d ago (Edited 3376d ago )

@ShaunCameron It did hurt them. They missed out on PC sales. I can tell that PC gamers have been requesting RDR for years dude. I know what I am talking about.

starchild3377d ago

Of course not. But it's still a slap in the face to PC gamers. The fact that 99.9% of third party developers, and even some first party developers, make sure to put their games on PC shows that PC is indeed a profitable platform.

PlayableGamez-3376d ago

Even Ubisoft is putting WD2 on PC and they have more of a reason not to put their open world game on PC than Rockstar.

AlexFili3376d ago

They certainly don't have to, but doing something contrary to what the whole games industry is doing definitely seems like an odd choice. I haven't seen any benefit to holding back on the PC release date for GTAV unless I'm mistaken.

Razzer3377d ago (Edited 3377d ago )

GTA 5 didn't release on PC for months after consoles. Probably the same deal here.

divinealpha3377d ago

If you forgot I'll refresh you, it took a year for gta 5 to hit pc ,maybe that will be the same case for this.

Razzer3377d ago

think I edited my post the same time you posted this. yeah.....I had forgotten that they didn't release at the same time.

AlexFili3376d ago

Knowing Rockstar they probably can't be bothered. Not releasing RDR on PC was a kick in the face, doing it again is not going to win them any fans at all. Let's not forget how "amazing" their GTAV launch was... i.e. the one with loads of bugs, huge delay in sorting out server problems... Yeah I'm not going to rush out and buy a console anytime soon.

TheUndertaker853377d ago

Red Dead Redemption which would be a closer match to RDR 2 never released on PC nor was there ever an intention to do so.

Razzer3377d ago

Could be. If they don't ever intend to port it to PC.....hope they just say that.

TheOptimist3376d ago

I have read reports where they said that the game engine was a mess and that they could only optimize it for two hardwares, so that is probably a reason, and also the consoles back then were quite a bit different from PCs. Right now both consoles are low end PCs practically, so I don't see why they can't bring it to PC.

medman3377d ago

Perhaps, but the troubling thing for pc only gamers is that Red Dead Redemption never made it's way to the pc at all.......

Show all comments (287)
110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community70d ago
TheDreamCorridor70d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg70d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW69d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro69d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg70d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya64d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje70d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P69d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils69d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake69d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community74d ago
Storm2374d ago (Edited 74d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer199274d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker74d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm2373d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

74d ago Replies(1)
70°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Fans Mourn the Loss of Iconic Musician

Red Dead Redemption 2 fans took to social media to honor D'Angelo.

Read Full Story >>
thethumbwars.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community93d ago
Changed: title
NovoSlev93d ago
Elda93d ago (Edited 93d ago )

I was listening to D Angelo when he debuted in 1995. He had some great songs from that period up in to the early 2000s. He was a talented Neo Soul musician. I never knew his music was in RDR. May he R.I.P.