I'm with you, initially that was supposedly the whole point of it.. I'm guessing it still does motion tweeting type stuff or the graphics are going to have to be severely cut back to reach ideal framerates.

I think they're just not mentioning the specifics on how it handles sending frames to the headset. They say it manages video, but not the specifics in that regard.

Edit: It obviously does reprojection since it sends images to both eyes. You can't have that without it. The 60fps to 120fps is 60fps x 2, not adding frames. It's 60fps per eye, not adding frames in the process. So, framerate on PS4 must, as Sony said at GDC, never fall below 60fps.

Sony have never said there will even be a PS5. We all know there will be, but to speak of it formally at this stage would be to dampen desirability of PS4 - they would be mad to speak about that at such an early stage.

After the initial sales spike starts to plateau to 'normal' levels, that would be a better time to speak of it in such a way. This would then encourage those thinking like you are to part with their cash.

Looking at the games and the support, PS VR & PS4 are plenty enough for me for the next few years. :^)

Lol what?

Rute has a great point. Sony doesn't need to state their will be a PS5, they only need to let gamers know if PSVR will be forward compatible. Releasing 1/2 through the gen, it would be nice to know.

That’s because it’s his favourite VR adventure games thus far, a great game always a great game regardless of age - Half life 2/ Ocarina of time - are old but still among the greatest games of all time. The irony of it is several are from last year, depending on platform, have you even played VR?