130°

Super Cherger in development for Xbox One Controller

An accessory maker by the name of Performance Design Products (PDP) has announced that they plan on releasing a quick charging unit for the Xbox One controller. This “Super Charger” as they are calling it, is capable of fully charging an empty controller in less than 60 seconds! That's right, 60 SECONDS!!

Read Full Story >>
xboxculture.com
TheCommentator3757d ago (Edited 3757d ago )

Old news which was uploaded two days ago, but it will still probably start fires really well.

Rookie_Monster3757d ago (Edited 3757d ago )

"After one of these quick charges, PDP claims that the controller will last the gamer around 10 hours of gameplay. This will allow players to continue gaming even when their controllers are depleted of charge. All the player has to do is take a one minute break and your controller will be fully charged when you return."

So that is why MS made the right choice of allowing replaceable battery instead of an enclosed, non-replaceable one. Things like this quick charger pack gives gamers many choices and options.

ziggurcat3757d ago

you can actually open up the PS4 controller, and replace the battery yourself if you feel inclined to do so (just like, as an example, you could technically open up the xbox one, and replace the internal HDD with a larger capacity HDD if you really felt like doing that). people have swapped the battery out, and have replaced them with similar batteries - even stronger ones.

so saying that the DS4 battery is non-replaceable is not entirely true.

KwietStorm_BLM3757d ago

Any battery is replaceable by that mentality. If it isn't made to do so, then it's labeled as such. People have replaced the battery on their iPhone and iPod or whatever, but it's not meant to be removed by the user.

ziggurcat3757d ago

the term he used was "an enclosed, non-replaceable one", though... whether it's user-replaceable is irrelevant, and I certainly wasn't implying that doing this was something the manufacturer *wants* you to do. The point was that you could *technically* replace the battery in the DS4 if you felt comfortable doing that.

Kiwi663757d ago

What and void the warranty if something goes wrong , no thanks

ziggurcat3757d ago

@kiwi:

by the time the battery inside becomes useless, the warranty would have long since expired, so that's a moot point. plus, i said "if you felt comfortable doing that" - obviously you wouldn't do it if you thought it was too risky. and besides, i did say that you *could* do it, not that you *should* nor did i say that it was even a viable option (I personally wouldn't do it). I'm just pointing out that you *can* actually swap the DS4 battery.

maniacmayhem3756d ago

You are seriously reaching with that defense Ziggurcat. The average person will never open up their ps4 controller and do any of that. You now sound like you're arguing with Rookie just for the sake of arguing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3756d ago
WeAreLegion3757d ago

Yeah. They should have left the disc drive out, too, so we could pick up our own! These companies make me sick with their all-inclusive practices.

sinspirit3757d ago

Exactly. People are making excuses. Just buy a rechargeable battery pack that clips onto your DualShock 4 if you think plugging in a cable is a "hassle". The battery in the controller is 99.9% of the time never going to have a problem. The only problem people pretend to have is plugging in a cord is apparently the end of the world. Justifying a whole console purchase on having to pay for extra battery replacements or to buy the recharge pack for an extra $20 when you can get PS4 controller battery clip ons for the same price. The clips are the best thing for both controllers to recharge. If you think buying batteries on top of batteries and wasting money and filling the land fills up with them is the better option then good for you. It doesn't mean you really have a good argument here. Get a recharge pack for whichever console you use. If you aren't bothered by a cord then plug your DualShock in for 15 minutes.

sinspirit3757d ago

Do you know what I do which completely negates your argument for lack of industry standard rechargeable batteries?

I have a PS4 rechargeable battery accessory that clips onto the controller and recharges it without being plugged in. When it's full I take it off. You think Sony doesn't have an option that is the same as replacing your AA's? In fact it's quicker. IF you buy the recharge pack for XBox you're basically lacking the argument anymore.

ThanatosDMC3757d ago

If some xb1 player reports this product to have destroyed their controller, melt something or cause a fire, their product will be dead.

Rookie_Monster3757d ago (Edited 3757d ago )

This product is still in development so I would imagine it will get tested over and over before final release

KwietStorm_BLM3757d ago

I don't know what amount of testing will be sufficient for a product made after the fact. If the controller itself wasn't made with quick charge compliance, this thing could cause problems.

rainslacker3757d ago

It would have to be tested against an large number of batteries from different manufactuers I'd assume. Unless this is just meant to charge the play n' charge kit...in which case if someone is using a 3rd party unlicensed one it could cause problems as well.

I'm a little dubious of quick chargers because unless you're using stock batteries, the potential for damage, fire, or personal injury is kind of high.

I'm not really sure what advantage this has over just plugging the controller in to charge while playing, and I can say from experience, these quick chargers rarely ever give a full charge in a minute...and there is speculation that quick charging can actually reduce the life of the battery by making it unable to charge if used too often.

Rookie_Monster3757d ago

Guys this is not only a charger but it does also in fact comes with its own proprietary battery pack as well. It only works with its own battery and not any other batteris from other manufacturers.

boing13757d ago

Cherger? Really? Is it that hard to proof read what you wrote before submitting? At least the headline ffs.

superchiller3757d ago

I agree. You would think that someone reviewing the article before it's approved would have caught that, but the person submitting it was pretty sloppy to not proof the headline himself/herself.

Kiwi663757d ago

Didn't you get the memo the letter a has retired to be replaced by e

SunnyZ3757d ago

IMA CHERGERING MAH LERZERZ!

TheCommentator3756d ago

They quick-wrote the article in 60 seconds, but the LOLs will last for hours!

IanTH3756d ago

It's sad that fine people like ourselves will proofread our comments - even include proper grammar and punctuation - when on the flip side there are so many articles posted here by authors that don't have enough pride to do the same to work they mean to have read en mass. Such an alien concept to me.

Hell, even my web browser has a spellchecker akin to Word. It just seems like your not-giving-a-shit must be borderline purposeful in order to make mistakes as often as I see them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3756d ago
Show all comments (27)
30°

Best Buy Foundation Presents Xbox Game Camp Minneapolis 2026

Xbox Game Camp Minneapolis 2026 is coming to Best Buy Teen Tech Centers in June. The immersive learning program will bring together 50 participants ages 18 – 19. Participants will experience the key aspects of the game development lifecycle from concept to playable prototype.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
40°

Free Xbox Ally X update could deliver 30% smoother handheld performance with Auto Super Resolution

Original long title : A free Xbox Ally X update could deliver up to 30% smoother performance for your handheld games — "Automatic Super Resolution" preview starts soon.

Summary : Xbox is bringing Automatic Super Resolution to the Xbox Ally X in April. The AI upscaling feature aims to improve performance while keeping games sharp.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
babadivad33d ago

Nice, more performance is always good.

60°

Next-Gen Xbox on Track for 2027 Release According to AMD

AMD has mentioned that the next-gen Xbox is on track for release in 2027, which means we might be in the final year of the Series X|S.

71d ago
KicksnSnares71d ago

Xbox is dead. How are they making another console? Fake news lol

fr0sty71d ago (Edited 71d ago )

They might think taking a crack at the PC/console hybrid approach might work out for them... but with PS6 delayed until 2029 at least, there went the power advantage that paying all that extra money was supposed to afford them once PS6 does launch. Also, releasing a console right now is stupid with RAM prices as high as they are. Either we're gonna be forking out $1200-1500 for this thing, or it's going to get downgraded. It costs over $700 to put 64GB of RAM into a PC right now because all the AI datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM.

Maybe a select few gamers will be willing to fork out that much $ for a system that is more powerful than PS5 Pro, but most gamers are only just now feeling like PS5 is hitting its stride and still has a few years of life left in it before we need to move on to a new generation. Plus, by the time PS6 does launch, RAM prices will be stablizing, so PS6 will be able to put much more of its overall budget towards a more powerful GPU and CPU vs. having to spend such a large chunk of the budget just on RAM like the new Xbox will, assuming it does drop next year while still in the midst of this RAM crisis.

Reaper22_71d ago (Edited 71d ago )

People said the same thing about xbox 360 launching early but it turned out pretty good. Microsoft's R&D is much larger and more cash rich than Sony's. They have the money to do it. One of the reason Sony is waiting because they arent ready to spend billions more on hardware and the PS5 is still selling and that would definitely hurt their sales. Plus they just released Ps5 pro.
The series x isn't selling well so for Microsoft its a good time to get ready for next gen. The next console from xbox is gonna be for core gamers and no matter when sony launches it probably wont have many advances over Magnus if any at all. Im confident it will be on par or better than the next Playstation. Even the series x does features that ps5 or the pro still cant do. Sony shouldn't of released the PS5 pro. Imo its not needed and underwhelming. They could of used what they spent on that for the PS6

salis84471d ago (Edited 71d ago )

First, no one actually said that PS6 is delayed.

The rumor started with Tom Henderson saying he thought PlayStation might consider delaying the PS6 due to RAM prices. He specifically did not say that he heard that they were going to delay it or anything like that, it was 100% speculation, and he never implied otherwise.

That said, let them delay it, the PS5 Pro especially with FSR 4 coming in the next month or so, will be more than sufficient. There isn't going to be any publishers, including Microsoft, willing to skip PlayStation's user base, especially when publishers seem eager to put games on Switch 2 which is a significant step down even from the base PS5. So, the idea that having more power is really going to shift things in their favor is extremely hard to believe.

Microsoft can make as many consoles as they want, the issue is convincing people to buy them.

Both the PS5 and the Switch 2 sold double the amount of consoles in December that the SX sold in the entire year of 2025. And I doubt that a super expensive co-pilot box is going to help them, especially if you look at the lackluster sales AI equipped PC's have seen.

71d ago
Eonjay70d ago

The next Xbox issaid to have 36 GB of memory so the price short from ram should not be as apocalyptic as a 64 GB kit. With the PS6 coming in with 30 GB, the RAM should not be what makes the Xbox cost so much more. Of course without Microsoft subsidizing the console the actual MSRPs may diverge wildly.

fr0sty70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

32GB of DDR5 still costs in the neighborhood of $250-300 for the super cheap stuff, $450 for the name brand. That's what entire consoles used to cost. That eats up a huge chunk of the budget that was supposed to be paying for the CPU and GPU, which means that the cost of this system will be driven farther north than previously anticipated, and it was already expected to be above $1k. Releasing a console in the middle of an industry-wide RAM shortage is stupid. Even GPU makers are scaling back production because of it, and focusing their remaining stock and production towards selling to datacenters. Some memory manufacturers have dropped consumer products entirely and now only make chips for datacenters. Nvidia is scaling back its consumer GPUs, no longer offering the super series of some GPUs, for instance.

For MS to pull the trigger now means releasing at a very risky price point against a PS5 that is simply on fire, even outselling the Switch 2 in many cases. It's coming at a time where the Xbox brand is at its weakest ever, and consumer confidence in the brand is at absolute rock bottom. Nobody wants to drop $1500 on an Xbox when they can play the same games on their PS5 Pro for half the price already, or even cheaper if using a base PS5. Only a select few enthusiasts will bother to fork out that kind of money... by the time this product reaches a price point where it can have mass-market appeal, the PS6 will be dropping... but by that time, RAM prices will be dropping, so PS6 will now be able to, assuming it does delay until 2029, invest more into upgrading its architecture over the previously released spec, invest in more RAM than the new Xbox will have, a better CPU & GPU, etc.

As for nobody saying PS6 will launch in 2029, nobody said it would come sooner either, not officially, at least. As of now all we have to go by are rumors based on internal information that could easily change at a moment's notice. Even the design of the chip itself could change as it has not yet entered into production. They could easily opt to include a few more CUs, more RAM, more CPU cores, etc. between now and when it does officially enter production. So, MS could drop a new Xbox now, but it wouldn't be wise, at all, for them to do so if they plan on even holding a candle agains the juggernaut that will be PS6. PS5 will most likely mop the floor with it due to its price point alone.

And that's assuming MS even gives the green light to start manufacturing the console to begin with. We'll see in the coming months if production even happens. Microsoft's shareholders damn sure aren't going to be willing to subsidize anything at all after they just dumped $100b into buying game publishers, expecting to see a ROI, and not seeing it anywhere near as fast as they'd hoped, which is why we're now playing Xbox games on PS5.

As for MS sitting on RAM, they are sitting on some, but Xbox is sitting on none. Microsoft knows good and well they will make far more money putting that RAM into datacenters than they ever would putting it into a console that is already at a huge disadvantage before it even launches, and has little hope of generating a lot of sales.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 70d ago
Neonridr71d ago

It'll end up being a Windows based machine that utilizes an Xbox ecosystem as well to play their game library on. But you'll end up being able to buy games from places like Steam as well more than likely.

Would make the most sense honestly. Best of both worlds.

Agent7570d ago

Microsoft should just ditch Xbox and cash in on PC and PlayStation games, maybe even Switch 2. Apparently, they make a loss on hardware, so what's the point?

Reaper22_71d ago

How can this be? Xbox died already.

71d ago Replies(1)
mkis00770d ago (Edited 70d ago )

What Xbox was is dead. Long live Xbox. I mean Halo and fable are coming to PlayStation this year. Gears and forza are already there. I'm here for it. I will absolutely give MS publishing my money if they make good games.

71d ago Replies(1)
Elda70d ago

My XBOX Series X is my first & my last XB console.

Show all comments (21)