All Channels
Popular
440°

Xbox One Backwards Compatibility was Overhyped

The Xbox One Backwards Compatibility launch games have been revealed today and Jason Stettner of Gamerheadquarters takes a look at why the list looks as though it is along with why this was overhyped. Opinion article that dissects why some franchise appear while others are gone and the disappointment from fans of this announcement.

Read Full Story >>
articles.gamerheadquarters.com
Neonridr3843d ago

Point is it's a start. It's only going to grow and get better from here.

LOL_WUT3843d ago

No one's arguing that though... It's a nice feature to have indeed, yet the point is that it was overhyped. ;)

gangsta_red3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

How was it overhyped.

It was on MS forums as the top five most requested feature for MS to include in the Xbox One.

MS delivered on it for their users/fans.

It was a big deal, MS listened to their fans and it got the media attention it deserved.

How is that overhype?

@Death
I agree, the only overhype I saw was from the many commenting saying it wasn't a big deal, not a system seller or anything else to downplay it constantly.

Death3843d ago

It's amazing that people are already trying to downplay b/c before it even launches. The list of 104 games is the initial list with more to come each month. We already have a small preview of the games coming in a few weeks with the December update and they look good. Not to mention we will have access to all of the Games with Gold 360 games remotely on Windows 10 devices without needing a disc. That's a pretty cool feature.

The only thing overhyped about b/c on the Xbox One are the stories trying to downplay a free feature that gives gamers access to games they already own on the new Xbox. How anyone can label this as disappointing is beyond me.

Neonridr3843d ago

@LOL_WUT - the article is not suggesting that backwards compatibility is overhyped, but that the list of the initial games isn't "good enough".

christocolus3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

@Death

well said. This was the most requested feature on the feedback site and MS delivered.Just like xbox 360 the list of BC titles will keep growing over time. The fact that titles like COD blackops will be added to the list is already a big plus and im sure we'll get Read dead at some point. People can downplay all they like..it doesnt change anything.The feature is a nice addition and its free.I will use it and so will my friends. I cant wait to boot up stick of truth. :)

343_Guilty_Spark3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

And yet backwards compatibilty is nonexistent on PS4.

I own several games on the list and expect more to come.

What is the issue here?

Oh I know IF Microsoft does it automatically sucks according to N4TRASH

3843d ago
nX3843d ago

^No matter how many or which games are compatible, pretty much noone buys a next gen console to play last gen games. I played through everything I wanted to and sold my old console when the new ones came out... and haven't looked back since.

Death3843d ago

@nx,

No one is forcing gamers to keep or play their Xbox 360 games. If you want to sell your 360 games and consoles, it's completely up to you. If you want to keep your library of 360 games and play them on the new system, that's a choice you have too.

@TheWC,

That's quite the BS argument you have there. The Wii outsold the PS4 and Xbox 360 last gen. Does this make it a better console or give it better features? Flip your argument, are you saying having b/c would result in lower sales for the PS4? Keep in mind b/c isn't even out yet and you are claiming sales don't justify the feature. I know it always sounds weird when your console is on top, but sales don't make a console better, it just means it sells more. I wouldn't expect sales in regions that shunned the 360 to explode with the b/c announcement. The only thing b/c will do is help retain Xbox customers. Playstation and Wii fans aren't going to jump ship with the announcement that the Xbox One will play Xbox 360 games they don't have. Not everything is about making sales, sometimes it's nice to simply take care of those that take care of you.

joab7773843d ago

We knew that b/c they've done studies and know that while ppl scream for it, they don't use it all that often.

RiseofScorpio3843d ago

@nx

So because you played every game (so you claim) that means everyone has? You know that's a lie.

UnHoly_One3843d ago

I love this "nobody buys a new console to play old games" argument, it's hilarious.

I bet you didn't buy your PS4 to watch Netflix or Blu Rays, but that doesn't meant you won't use it for that.

Stupid idiotic argument.

C'mon people.

marloc_x3843d ago

As overhyped a stability and avatars?
😉

kitsune4513843d ago

Didn't they do something like this for the Xbox 360 backwards compatibility? How many games ended up getting on the list there?

nix3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

I would love to see how many ppl use this feature for a very long time. I had a BC PS3 and i played ZERO PS2 games. Many might try one or two games but that's it. I sometimes think that it was requested by fanboys just to have an upper hand over PS4.

This should have come out when Xbox1 didn't have any major exclusive games in the first 8 months. Now there's enough games to keep ppl busy. Or it should have come out after 2016.

And yeah the initial list was pretty damp.

muzikjunkie803843d ago

TheWC

"Yet Bloodborne achieved a 90+ metacritic score. Something you failed to mention."

AND yet i still have no interest in that game as im not into RPGs so it could have a 10/10 score and i could care less so your point is???

AngelicIceDiamond3843d ago

Well lucky for you writer that this is only the beginning of BC games.

Godmars2903842d ago

@gangsta_red:
Its overhyped in that where the feature is called a system seller. Something that's being introduced year post release when some 360 owners sold their 360s and the game with them.

Yeah, its going to be reason for what 360 owners who kept their system to upgrade to an XO, XO owners who kept their 360 libraries, but that's about it. Other than lording it over the PS4 fan camp of course.

whoyouwit043842d ago

it's only overhyped because it's a feature PS4 will never have.

gangsta_red3842d ago (Edited 3842d ago )

@Godmars
Where does it state that BC is a system seller? Has MS officially marketed the Xbox One with BC as a system seller? Can you show me the commercials, ad campaigns and the world wide tour where MS over promoted and over hyped this feature?

Or are you going to point out the comments on N4G from fanboys who claimed this?

"Other than lording it over the PS4 fan camp of course."

And of course PS4 owners will claim it's overhyped, no one uses BC and it's not necessary because you buy a new system to play new games. Yes Godmars, we have heard all the excuses from each camp in every Xbox BC article.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3842d ago
3843d ago Replies(9)
hiawa233843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Neon, I agree. Phil said they would have around 100 games ready at launch for others to follow. Looks like they delivered on that. He also said non MS published games had to be approved by the pub before they can appear. I still have my 360 so bc I personally don't care about and I certainly did not buy an X1 to play 360 games. I find hilarious at the gamers on various sites who said months ago they did not care about bc are the first ones to bash MS just to bash now the list has been released.

Why o why3843d ago

Yep . . It's better to have an option than none at all. . It's not quite the conventional bc but once they were clear on what they were trying it was clear it wasn't going to be if finished article at launch. Keep working on it Microsoft. . I wish Sony followed suit on this

3-4-53843d ago

They said "Hundreds more" coming later, so there are more games to play later, but for now it's a nice start.

Can't wait to play Sonic 1,2,3, Monday Night Combat,Super Hang-on, and a bunch of other games.

3843d ago
Automatic793842d ago

Click bait article pike so many that try to knock positives.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3842d ago
RzaDaRazor3843d ago

It's overhyped simply because it's not on PS4. The alternative to BC would be to stream the games with lag and have to buy games you already own. THAT is overhyped.

Ricegum3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

What a silly comment. The fact is PS3 had b/c and no one batted an eyelid, it was nice to have options of course but most people were interested in playing new current gen games. Why is Xbox One's b/c so overhyped like its the second coming of Christ? It's really quite daft. Is it because you're unhappy with the current Xbox One games? Who knows.

And you didn't need that fanboy garbage at the end now did you?

gangsta_red3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

"The fact is PS3 had b/c and no one batted an eyelid,"

Yes, because it was expected since the PS2 had BC, it was only natural that the PS3 also offer the same feature.

I can tell you though people DID bat their eyelids when Sony decided to take it out and then gave the excuse of "no one used it" instead of just admitting they took it out to lower the cost of the PS3.

"Why is Xbox One's b/c so overhyped like its the second coming of Christ? It's really quite daft"

What's funny is only a certain fanbase is treating it like it's overhyped. I read from Xbox fans that they are happy they are seeing this feature, a feature they requested MS to implement. Then I read comments from the a lot of the sony fanbase that keep claiming it's not a system seller, it's overhyped, no one plays older games, Xbox fans think it will move units. They are making up these claims for very fanboyish reasons and why is that? Because their system doesn't have it or that Sony told them that no plays older games on their new system while they repackage older games remastered and sell them back to their users or charge a fee for rent offered by PSNow. Who knows.

Once again, this is a great feature for Xbox One, it's a check mark feature added to the many other great features this system currently has. I rather they have it then not have it at all.

3843d ago
magiciandude3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

As a long time PS fan having switched over to Xbox this generation, BC with 360 is a huge deal for me, and there are plenty of games I'd like to play on this list. I have PS2 BC on my PS3 and used it quite a bit during the last generation. BC is one of the most pro-consumer features that any console can ever have. There are many games from each generation that are still fun playing every now and then. Why just toss them away when you can get more of your past money's worth by playing them between new releases? Sheesh...

RzaDaRazor3843d ago

It's amazing that people can't understand this. BC is not a big deal when everything is on disc. The fact that last gen started towards digital releases, it is fantastic to have hundreds of games I already bought digitally just show up on my XOne. Literally, hundreds of more games to play that are available just like XOne games with all the features of XOne. How in the world can people spin this as a negative? Amazing. Just because they are 360 games doesn't make them inferior. They are digital game releases that I can play like they are native to my XOne. BOOYA!!!!!

Death3843d ago

@Unreal,

The Xbox 360 launched November of 2005 and was out 8 years before the Xbox One released November 2013. That's quite some time to build up a library of games. Being able to play your existing library of games on a new platform should be something we all can do. There is obviously a value to this back catalog of games since Sony found a business model renting these games back to gamers. I'm always impressed by the people that blow off b/c as being trivial and not needed while they give PSNow a pass on doing the same thing for a fee. How is it people are willing to pay to play these games, but having access to your games for free isn't needed?

nitus103843d ago

@gangsta_red

Sony never removed backwards compatibility from the PS3, in fact the only feature they actually removed was the "Other OS" because of security issues. Lets be honest here, how many people actually used this?

What Sony did do was to not include PS2 backwards compatibility in later releases of the PS3 and in addition not implement the card readers (who really needed this?) as well as reducing the 4 USB slots to 2. By doing this Sony was able to reduce the price of the later release PS3's dramatically.

It must be noted that all PS3's will still play PS1 games.

Since PC's do have emulators for PS1 and PS2 games it may be possible to have BC emulation software for the PS4 if Sony gave the go ahead to do this. However I very much doubt we will see BC software emulators for PS3 game disks on the PS4.

Still any type of BC is welcomed on any console although it is usually best to implement this at the launch of the console not two years later.

gangsta_red3842d ago

@nitus10

"Lets be honest here, how many people actually used this?"

I did, I specifically bought a 60gig fat for BC. I had a ton of PS2 games that I didn't finish and I wanted that feature.

"What Sony did do was to not include PS2 backwards compatibility in later releases of the PS3 ..."

Isn't that essentially removing backwards compatibility from their consoles? They stopped production of the 60fat PS3's in favor of a lower costing PS3 even though PS2's at that time were cheap to manufacture.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3842d ago
vanity293843d ago

Or you could, you know, not RENT games you already own and get the ones you missed. Guess that's not possible.

RzaDaRazor3843d ago

Wouldn't it be nice to have the OPTION of playing the games you already own? Guess not.

vanity293843d ago

I have that option, it's called keeping my ps3. Also got a ps2 and x360 for all my backward needs.

Death3843d ago

I have a PS3 60gig that I can play all of my PS3, PS2 and original Playstation games on. I also have a PS4 I use for playing PS4 games. Same TV has my Xbox One and Xbox 360 hooked up as well as a cable box for watching TV. This TV has 3 HDMI inputs. In case you weren't counting, that's 5 devices and 3 inputs. If I didn't have a b/c PS3, they would be using the inputs my Dreamcast and Gamecube are currently using. Obviously you enjoy moving plugs around to play games, but I'm not as much of a fan. When the Xbox One gets more b/c games, I'll unplug my 360 from it and put it away or use it on another TV. This frees up the HDMI input for something else making life a little easier.

Besides this, what are you going to do if your PS3/PS2/PS1/360 breaks? Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to use your new console instead of buying a replacement? Not to mention using the new features of a current gen machine with last gen games. Seamlessly switching games on one console to play with friends on either gen console is also nice. There are many perks to b/c and no drawbacks I can think of.

sullynathan3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Truthfully the main downside to it is how late it came out. The big games will be coming from 2015 and onward so people would have less of a reason to play last gen games.

I still don't think Microsoft told us a reason why they didn't announce this on day one.

Off topic. Could someone tell me how to gain bubbles?

3843d ago
BiggerBoss3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

You gain bubbles for making intelligent, helpful, and funny comments, and you lose them for trolling or being immature. Its much harder to gain bubbles than it is to lose them:)

Edit: as you can see above and below my post, users who make immature comments tend to have lower bubble counts.

nix3843d ago

I mostly talk sense but ppl don't like bitter truth. But sometimes i just like to play with fanboys' heads, then they really go full hate.

I sometimes feel like I'm that guy controlling these fanboys, just like that PS4 Camera games where these little minions are inside the controller.

Good when i want to past time.

Ricegum3843d ago ShowReplies(1)
ApocalypseShadow3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

The reason is because Microsoft was hoping the sales of the console would improve on its own against PS4 and reduce the deficit when they removed kinect and did a 180 on almost everything. It didn't.

So they reduced the price and bundled many games with it.even misled gamers to "act now" before the price went back up.didn't work.

So they left the price and concentrated on games but that hasn't moved the needle. Didn't work.

So they announced BC as a way of getting 360 gamers to upgrade as that is their only option to improve sales as PS4 gamers are waiting to spend that extra money on PSVR.and Nintendo fans are waiting for the NX.

BC is not a bad thing. It's great. But newer games are coming. It's too late in the game to offer something 2 years later.

I say this because PS4 is selling truck loads without ANY BC. It's not that big of a deal. But nice to have.

xasz3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

"The reason is because Microsoft was hoping the sales of the console would improve on its own against PS4 and reduce the deficit when they removed kinect and did a 180 on almost everything. It didn't."

"So they announced BC as a way of getting 360 gamers to upgrade as that is their only option to improve sales as PS4 gamers are waiting to spend that extra money on PSVR.and Nintendo fans are waiting for the NX."

No.

That's not "the reason".

The "reason" is because it was the top most-requested feature on the Xbox's feedback site:

https://xbox.uservoice.com/...

https://xbox.uservoice.com/...

I find it funny that if MS didn't do this, people would then turn around and say that "Microsoft doesn't listen to their fans".

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3843d ago
Lennoxb633843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Its a requested feature that Xbox gamers wanted, nothing more, nothing less. People are really angry over this. lol

Why is this feature in the limelight though? Don't people know that there are TONS of features that the X1 has that the PS4 doesn't"

Show all comments (93)
30°

Best Buy Foundation Presents Xbox Game Camp Minneapolis 2026

Xbox Game Camp Minneapolis 2026 is coming to Best Buy Teen Tech Centers in June. The immersive learning program will bring together 50 participants ages 18 – 19. Participants will experience the key aspects of the game development lifecycle from concept to playable prototype.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
40°

Free Xbox Ally X update could deliver 30% smoother handheld performance with Auto Super Resolution

Original long title : A free Xbox Ally X update could deliver up to 30% smoother performance for your handheld games — "Automatic Super Resolution" preview starts soon.

Summary : Xbox is bringing Automatic Super Resolution to the Xbox Ally X in April. The AI upscaling feature aims to improve performance while keeping games sharp.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
babadivad65d ago

Nice, more performance is always good.

60°

Next-Gen Xbox on Track for 2027 Release According to AMD

AMD has mentioned that the next-gen Xbox is on track for release in 2027, which means we might be in the final year of the Series X|S.

104d ago
KicksnSnares103d ago

Xbox is dead. How are they making another console? Fake news lol

fr0sty103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

They might think taking a crack at the PC/console hybrid approach might work out for them... but with PS6 delayed until 2029 at least, there went the power advantage that paying all that extra money was supposed to afford them once PS6 does launch. Also, releasing a console right now is stupid with RAM prices as high as they are. Either we're gonna be forking out $1200-1500 for this thing, or it's going to get downgraded. It costs over $700 to put 64GB of RAM into a PC right now because all the AI datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM.

Maybe a select few gamers will be willing to fork out that much $ for a system that is more powerful than PS5 Pro, but most gamers are only just now feeling like PS5 is hitting its stride and still has a few years of life left in it before we need to move on to a new generation. Plus, by the time PS6 does launch, RAM prices will be stablizing, so PS6 will be able to put much more of its overall budget towards a more powerful GPU and CPU vs. having to spend such a large chunk of the budget just on RAM like the new Xbox will, assuming it does drop next year while still in the midst of this RAM crisis.

Reaper22_103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

People said the same thing about xbox 360 launching early but it turned out pretty good. Microsoft's R&D is much larger and more cash rich than Sony's. They have the money to do it. One of the reason Sony is waiting because they arent ready to spend billions more on hardware and the PS5 is still selling and that would definitely hurt their sales. Plus they just released Ps5 pro.
The series x isn't selling well so for Microsoft its a good time to get ready for next gen. The next console from xbox is gonna be for core gamers and no matter when sony launches it probably wont have many advances over Magnus if any at all. Im confident it will be on par or better than the next Playstation. Even the series x does features that ps5 or the pro still cant do. Sony shouldn't of released the PS5 pro. Imo its not needed and underwhelming. They could of used what they spent on that for the PS6

salis844103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

First, no one actually said that PS6 is delayed.

The rumor started with Tom Henderson saying he thought PlayStation might consider delaying the PS6 due to RAM prices. He specifically did not say that he heard that they were going to delay it or anything like that, it was 100% speculation, and he never implied otherwise.

That said, let them delay it, the PS5 Pro especially with FSR 4 coming in the next month or so, will be more than sufficient. There isn't going to be any publishers, including Microsoft, willing to skip PlayStation's user base, especially when publishers seem eager to put games on Switch 2 which is a significant step down even from the base PS5. So, the idea that having more power is really going to shift things in their favor is extremely hard to believe.

Microsoft can make as many consoles as they want, the issue is convincing people to buy them.

Both the PS5 and the Switch 2 sold double the amount of consoles in December that the SX sold in the entire year of 2025. And I doubt that a super expensive co-pilot box is going to help them, especially if you look at the lackluster sales AI equipped PC's have seen.

103d ago
Eonjay103d ago

The next Xbox issaid to have 36 GB of memory so the price short from ram should not be as apocalyptic as a 64 GB kit. With the PS6 coming in with 30 GB, the RAM should not be what makes the Xbox cost so much more. Of course without Microsoft subsidizing the console the actual MSRPs may diverge wildly.

fr0sty103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

32GB of DDR5 still costs in the neighborhood of $250-300 for the super cheap stuff, $450 for the name brand. That's what entire consoles used to cost. That eats up a huge chunk of the budget that was supposed to be paying for the CPU and GPU, which means that the cost of this system will be driven farther north than previously anticipated, and it was already expected to be above $1k. Releasing a console in the middle of an industry-wide RAM shortage is stupid. Even GPU makers are scaling back production because of it, and focusing their remaining stock and production towards selling to datacenters. Some memory manufacturers have dropped consumer products entirely and now only make chips for datacenters. Nvidia is scaling back its consumer GPUs, no longer offering the super series of some GPUs, for instance.

For MS to pull the trigger now means releasing at a very risky price point against a PS5 that is simply on fire, even outselling the Switch 2 in many cases. It's coming at a time where the Xbox brand is at its weakest ever, and consumer confidence in the brand is at absolute rock bottom. Nobody wants to drop $1500 on an Xbox when they can play the same games on their PS5 Pro for half the price already, or even cheaper if using a base PS5. Only a select few enthusiasts will bother to fork out that kind of money... by the time this product reaches a price point where it can have mass-market appeal, the PS6 will be dropping... but by that time, RAM prices will be dropping, so PS6 will now be able to, assuming it does delay until 2029, invest more into upgrading its architecture over the previously released spec, invest in more RAM than the new Xbox will have, a better CPU & GPU, etc.

As for nobody saying PS6 will launch in 2029, nobody said it would come sooner either, not officially, at least. As of now all we have to go by are rumors based on internal information that could easily change at a moment's notice. Even the design of the chip itself could change as it has not yet entered into production. They could easily opt to include a few more CUs, more RAM, more CPU cores, etc. between now and when it does officially enter production. So, MS could drop a new Xbox now, but it wouldn't be wise, at all, for them to do so if they plan on even holding a candle agains the juggernaut that will be PS6. PS5 will most likely mop the floor with it due to its price point alone.

And that's assuming MS even gives the green light to start manufacturing the console to begin with. We'll see in the coming months if production even happens. Microsoft's shareholders damn sure aren't going to be willing to subsidize anything at all after they just dumped $100b into buying game publishers, expecting to see a ROI, and not seeing it anywhere near as fast as they'd hoped, which is why we're now playing Xbox games on PS5.

As for MS sitting on RAM, they are sitting on some, but Xbox is sitting on none. Microsoft knows good and well they will make far more money putting that RAM into datacenters than they ever would putting it into a console that is already at a huge disadvantage before it even launches, and has little hope of generating a lot of sales.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 103d ago
Neonridr103d ago

It'll end up being a Windows based machine that utilizes an Xbox ecosystem as well to play their game library on. But you'll end up being able to buy games from places like Steam as well more than likely.

Would make the most sense honestly. Best of both worlds.

Agent75103d ago

Microsoft should just ditch Xbox and cash in on PC and PlayStation games, maybe even Switch 2. Apparently, they make a loss on hardware, so what's the point?

Reaper22_103d ago

How can this be? Xbox died already.

103d ago Replies(1)
mkis007103d ago (Edited 103d ago )

What Xbox was is dead. Long live Xbox. I mean Halo and fable are coming to PlayStation this year. Gears and forza are already there. I'm here for it. I will absolutely give MS publishing my money if they make good games.

103d ago Replies(1)
Elda103d ago

My XBOX Series X is my first & my last XB console.

Show all comments (21)