All Channels
Popular
Approvals 13/3 ▼
ArchangelMike (1) - 4050d ago Cancel
Bigpappy (2) - 4049d ago Cancel
Pozzle (5) - 4049d ago Cancel
N311V (1) - 4049d ago Cancel
CaViE (2) - 4050d ago Cancel
AidenPhenix (1) - 4050d ago Cancel
40°

Consensus Does Not Invalidate Personal Experience

EGMR's Bracken Lee-Rudolph discusses polarising attitudes in gaming, and how ostracising people based on uncommon views will not help the industry progress.

Quote: "Last week, an IGN article went up about Bloodborne and how Reviews Editor, Dan Stapleton, struggled to retain interest through the grindingly formulaic gameplay, and brutal difficulty.

IGN’s own review of the game rated it at a 9.1/10; an incredible score by most measurements. Our own review gave it a 90 — from the perspective of a reviewer who has played, and loved, the past Souls games. These are hardly the only positive reviews on the internet for a game which has largely received critical acclaim, but still Dan Stapleton, a journalist in the industry for over a decade now, found little to no enjoyment from Bloodborne‘s unforgiving outlay."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4049d ago
nucky644050d ago (Edited 4050d ago )

bracken,(the guy who wrote the article) put together a well thought out article. however, he never took the time to consider if dan stapleton was wrong in his assessment of the game - and I DO think he was wrong. I think this because stapleton wants to say the game is bad because, basically, he isn't any good at it - and I don't agree with this.
yea, there are some technical issues that I'm sure will be patched; but,I think bloodborne is a fantastic game. I haven't played a non arcade-style game (like resogun or superstardust) that I can't stop playing in quite a while. the last one that came close was farcry4 - and it's not anything near as good as bloodborne.

ArchangelMike4050d ago (Edited 4050d ago )

This is the problem with review scores and why they are a double edged sword.

On the one hand a person who doesn't like a game will score it low... which will not necessarily reflect the overall package of the game, but more likely simply reflect personal dislike.

On the other hand, without such high reviews scores classic games like Bloodborne would not necesarily get so much recognition or nearly as much 'critical reception'. Review scores still speak very loudly.

I think the best way forward is for sites to allow two or more people with different tastes to review a game, and give a balanced view of the game based on their personal prefernces. And this should be made clear - that it is their personal preference.

Take Bloodborne for example, who would be best suitrdd to reviewing the game? A Souls afficionado? Or a Souls newbie? Otherwise how will gamers ever get an informed and balanced approach!?

thorstein4049d ago

I would take your idea a step further. Only allow reviewers of a favored genre review games.

For instance, a person steeped in RPGs should review RPGs and their ilk, whereas FPS shooters are to be reviewed by FPS "experts."

The problem with a review is that the other reviews on the site must match the criteria. This site gives Destiny and The Order 60/100. Watch Dogs a 90/100.

I am not arguing against anyone of the reviews, just pointing out how ludicrously unimportant they are.

The Order has outsold Watch Dogs. Destiny has outsold Watch Dogs.

Players want games and they will buy the ones they want. And no, sales aren't only based on hype etc.

Reviews, I think, have had their day. They are now useless as I can get my hands on a game through rental, Now, or share play and get to know it.

Bigpappy4049d ago

Interesting article. Looks like 'souls and blooborne' fans have put the fear in to these journalist. Fanboys , especially, would say just about anything to anyone who have any negative reaction to what them deem untouchable. This adds even less confidence to already skeptical reviews. Now you have to worry if the reviewer's fear backlash.

I think they should review the game to it's merit, as they see it. The fanboy will have a hissy fit, but they will still come back to see how you rate the next one if your review proved to be factual. Honesty is always the best policy. When you try to appease just to win favor, you end up trapping yourself because you will never be consistent and at many time along the way your true feeling with surface. once you loose credibility, you loose way more fans than the ones you pissed of for telling the TRUTH.

40°

Hideo Kojima put Low Roar in Death Stranding because gamers need more culture in their lives

It's important in life to maintain a broad palette when it comes to culture and the arts. Hideo Kojima agrees, as he continues to use video games like Death Stranding to introduce people to music and other elements they might not otherwise discover.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community26d ago
40°

Mojang partners with Merlin Entertainments for the Minecraft theme park, Minecraft World

Mojang has partnered with Merlin Entertainments to build the world's first Minecraft theme park in the UK.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community39d ago
50°

Yakuza Live-Action Miniseries Debuts March 17 Exclusively on IGN

A three-episode live-action adaptation of the first two Yakuza video games will debut Tuesday, March 17 exclusively IGN. Each episode is about an hour long and will stream on IGN.com and IGN’s YouTube channel.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community48d ago
CrimsonWing6948d ago (Edited 48d ago )

I hope it’s better than that Prime series… woof.

shinXseijuro48d ago

Haven’t watched it . Is it not good ?

Seth_hun48d ago

Looks like everyone is a miscast :)