All Channels
Popular
60°

Guardian Interview: Fallout 3 and the problem with Armageddon

Guardian blog writes: "Last month I blogged about the dearth of decent post-apocalyptic games -in other words, games that deal with the apocalypse as a true human calamity rather than as an excuse to have a lot of people in leather fighting each other on modded trucks. However, a few readers name-checked Fallout 3, the forthcoming open world adventure from Bethesda, as a positive example, so I got some questions to the game's director, Todd Howard, about his vision for an interactive post-nuclear wasteland.

Fallout 3 does indeed sound like a promising exploration of archetypal themes, building massively on the foundations of the two two titles. Citing everything from the science of Hiroshima to Children of Men as influences, Howard puts forward a compelling case...

Q: Can you tell us how your vision of an apocalyptic environment has changed since previous Fallout titles?

A: I think it's changed only in terms of, this one is on the east coast. We wanted to have a large, expansive wasteland, but also a dense, destroyed urban jungle of rebar and concrete, complete with all the major DC landmarks. I might say Fallout 3 has more survivalhorror elements in it then the previous ones. I think it needs to be scary sometimes."

Read Full Story >>
blogs.guardian.co.uk
MK_Red6541d ago (Edited 6541d ago )

Hey, nice to hear the Raiders are back.
"several different endings, so all of them have some level of darkness in them" Loved this part.

Still can't shake the feeling that Todd and his team really didn't make the game too much like the originals. The Batman Begins example was a bad one. Original Batman films were decent to crappy so a great film like Begins was needed for them while Fallout 1 and 2 are essentially the best western RPGs ever made.

60°

Fallout 3 Remaster Is Allegedly Planned For Release At Some Point In The Future

A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
LucasRuinedChildhood128d ago

Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.

Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.

cloganart127d ago

I haven't seen anything on these performance issues? What's been going on?

walken7126d ago

Probably the Unreal Engine issues, I skipped it for that reason.

Snookies12128d ago (Edited 128d ago )

Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.

To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.

Michiel1989127d ago

all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.

Extermin8or3_127d ago

Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too

jznrpg127d ago

Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.

Christopher127d ago

Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".

BlaqMagiq1127d ago

Can't wait. Won't have to go back to my PS3 to play this when it comes out.

Show all comments (14)
80°

Fallout 3 remastered on the Nintendo Switch 2 is what we deserve, not the worst Fallout game

Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
jambola199d ago

Why exactly do you think you deserve it??

Phoenix76199d ago

Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.

gigoran8199d ago

PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh

1nsomniac199d ago

Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.

UltimateOwnage198d ago

So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.

Show all comments (6)
110°

Fallout 3 designer expects remaster to revise gunplay to make it closer to Fallout 4

Fallout 3 game designer Bruce Nesmith explains that the upcoming remaster should revise the game's gunplay to be more modern.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer1992387d ago

Give us FO3 with all the dlc remastered like ESO. Load times faster, quality of life improvements, gun play improvements

I believe it shouldn't just be graphical they should make improvements where they can to make the game better. A simple face lift isn't what's needed

ZeekQuattro387d ago

Still my favorite one. I remember getting a digital copy of FO3 when I got FO4(XBO). It was nice to finally play a stable version of the game. Then when I got a Series S it was an even better expierence. Quick resume and FPS boost made it feel like a whole new game. Updated gunplay would be very welcome though. One of the few things FO4 did better.