All Channels
Popular
Approvals 7/3 ▼
kevco33 (4) - 4373d ago Cancel
Nyxus (3) - 4373d ago Cancel
100°

VR vs. Microsoft

VRFocus - Despite having no virtual reality (VR) headset of its own, Microsoft remains a consistent talking point within the VR community. That’s to be expected, given that the company is one of the biggest names in technology and its Xbox One rival, Sony Computer Entertainment’s (SCE) PlaySation 4, already boasts a headset of its own. Not to mention that many of us in the videogame industry would like to see the likes of Halo, Gears of War, Fable and more see VR experiences of their own in the future.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4373d ago
user74029314374d ago Show
60FramesPerSecond4374d ago

Halo vr would be awesome. Forza VR would be awesome. Titanfall Vr, sure why not? Viva Piñata VR would be rather sad though.

Docknoss4373d ago

Seriously people are disagreeing with you? Lame

Eonjay4373d ago

Not sure. Some people seem to think that VR is a waste of time/resources. I disagree. We already know Microsoft is working on AR tech. This isn't the same, but it could add another layer of interaction like a floating HUD.

Volkama4373d ago

Mech Warrior. If Microsoft entered the VR arena they would absolutely have to resurrect Mech Warrior. And Crimson Skies.

Vehicle based games are just a perfect fit for tethered VR, because you are simulating staying still and controlling the vehicle (or mech) with a control interface of some kind. Exact match for what you will be doing in real life, mapped to the virtual environment.

Illusive_Man4373d ago

Microsoft needs to do better than make another headset. I want an experience that trumps anything I would experience on Oculus or Morpheus.

Perjoss4373d ago

You're probably looking to the wrong company if you want innovation.

JBSleek4373d ago (Edited 4373d ago )

Defiantly not true.

"your right, Ms doesn't have time for any of that innovation garbage, It is so much easier to just buy the companys doing all the innovation, crush them to powder and release a watered down version of their innovative tech to the masses."

People just take this crap way too seriously. Yes MS buys companies for their technologies but what major company doesn't? Oh that's right you can't think of one.

Also when has MS even done that. Their biggest recent purchase Skype is still alive and kicking.

madpuppy4373d ago

your right, Ms doesn't have time for any of that innovation garbage, It is so much easier to just buy the companys doing all the innovation, crush them to powder and release a watered down version of their innovative tech to the masses.

Yaay4me4373d ago

MS tends to buy innovation not make it. Just as they bought that AR company recently in association with their new AR patents.

Stoppokingme4373d ago (Edited 4373d ago )

Sony emulated the N64's analog thumbstick, then they emulated M$ achievements. That's hardly innovation.

jnemesh4373d ago

You are exactly right there! Look at Microsoft's track record of "innovation", especially in the past 5 to 10 years!

Smartphones...held leadership position, then flushed it down the toilet with Windows Phone. Pissed off all of their Windows Mobile customers by making new system incompatible. Then pissed off early adopters of Windows Phone 7 by making THAT incompatible 2 years later.

Surface (RT) - Tablet launched YEARS late and cost Microsoft $900,000 due to unsold product (and counting)

Windows 8 - Most hated Microsoft interface since "Bob"! MS refuses to listen to customer feedback, instead "doubling down" on "Metro" interface. Slaps customers in the face with the Start BUTTON they asked for...but not the MENU they really want...instead just takes users back to interface they hate! GENIUS!

No, I foresee Microsoft sitting back and letting others like Oculus and Sony take all of the risks with early models...then they will arrive 3 years late to the party with a sub-standard product, just like they ALWAYS do...

Or...one other possibility is that they will patent the hell out of anything related to VR tech, then troll the companies that ARE successful...just like they are with Android.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4373d ago
miyamoto4373d ago

Dude M$ already have Oculus Rift in the bag since the Facebook acquisition, trust me.

Since windows OS when did M$ made anything original?

M$ will buy anything with all their billions because they NEVER made their own.

madpuppy4373d ago

True, they bought Ms-dos, Office was acquired from another company they bought, The networking parts of Windows was lifted from BSD-unix, Ms are the kings of don't innovate just buy what you need and slap your name on it.

corvusmd4373d ago (Edited 4373d ago )

"Despite having no REVEALED virtual reality (VR) headset of its own" ..there fixed it. We all know that MS has been working on AR/VR tech for a long time, just because it's not revealed to the general public doesn't make it real or not. It's better to wait and release a better product, then race to the market with an incomplete one and watch it fail...in the sake of "innovation".

@Perjoss if you're knocking MS for innovation you clearly have not been paying attention. Throughout it's entire existence MS has been innovative whether you like it or not. Many staples in the video gaming world today were don't first by MS (despite being the youngest of the big three). Even now as we speak, they are constantly criticized for trying to introduce innovative ways to play video games, through Cloud Computing, creating a new API will "leave 'others' in the dust" and is "four generations ahead" and Skeletal Motion tracking. If you're doing something that no one else is doing, and you're constantly criticized by the "other side" (where their constant criticisms are "prove it" or "it'll never work"), chances are you are doing something innovative.

Just cause you don't like a company doesn't mean they aren't innovative. You denying that they do have aspects of innovation only proves that you are scared of change and won't accept their innovations yet...until someone you like does them.

JBSleek4373d ago

Just partner with Oculus for VR on your next console MS. Don't worry about R&D and the possibility that VR doesn't take off.

Also you have a platform that would be already up and going and would be cross compatible which is nice. I mean an Xbox is simply a PC now anyway.

ps360s4373d ago

I were going to comment about that too

I have the Oculus and it has potential

Yaay4me4373d ago (Edited 4373d ago )

There are a few miss-spellings in the article but good read. I think in the second to last sentence they mean Sony is gaining ground in VR not Microsoft since they dont even have a headset yet.

Show all comments (25)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community54d ago
Changed: credit url
Jin_Sakai54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio53d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing53d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9253d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit53d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing53d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9253d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community56d ago
Eonjay55d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn256d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn255d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown56d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay55d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay55d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac55d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger56d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300056d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde56d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde55d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community58d ago
Agent7557d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_55d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.