GameGrin's Andy McDonald writes: "I don’t mind admitting that I’m becoming a little bit weary of games whose core mechanics revolve around mining, crafting and resource gathering. There has been a definite oversaturation in the survival game market recently and it doesn’t look like it’s going to stop anytime soon. It seems that every other game I hear about is some kind of ‘open world survival’ or ‘procedurally generated sandbox action adventure!’. That age-old adage ‘Too much of a good thing.’ definitely rings true."
The Planet Explorers multiplayer code has been deleted and the developers will be releasing the game for free next week as they are unlikely to fix it.
How is that even possible? How is there no type of backup of the code? Control Z? Lol
If you’re looking for a sandbox game to let your imagination run wild and create what you want then head to Steam and try Planet Explorers.
Check out the games for those who want to boldly go to unknown times and place.
Replies(1)
Elite dangerous does the whole 'space' exploration better. By quite a bit. No mans sky is better for..landing on planets. ED is less repetitive too. Example... Dropping out of warp almost landing in a star is ****ing scary. Nothing like that happens in NMS. Nothing particularly interesting happens in space in NMS. ED, everything interesting is in space.
It's a shame really the way No Man's Sky ended up. It could have been so much more if they worked longer and with a bigger team on the game. It could have been the best sci fi exploring game of the decade.
They just announced a new foundation update which will introduce major changes including base building.
Oh God no. Space Engine is better, looks better, has just as much to do, and it's free.
Oh, and it actually has orbital patterns.
LMAO!! I got a good chuckle. Wheeww.. another "joke of the day" comment. I love those.
@kraenk12
I did play it. lol!! No where close to best of anything.
Most of these were available for a long time before NMS came out, especially Rodina.
