All Channels
Popular
Approvals 12/3 ▼
Bigpappy (2) - 4540d ago Cancel
Pozzle (4) - 4540d ago Cancel
Theyellowflash30 (2) - 4540d ago Cancel
Jhandville1992 (1) - 4540d ago Cancel
Concertoine (1) - 4540d ago Cancel
300°

DICE Will Not Develop Next Battlefield Title

Gaming business analyst Michael Pachter said that the next title in Battlefield series will not be developed by DICE in 2014, it was according to EA management.

Read Full Story >>
guide4games.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4540d ago
zeal0us4540d ago (Edited 4540d ago )

I'm pretty sure that game is a few years away.

PSVita4540d ago

Maybe a year or 2. Either way it's going to be great!....I hope.

jimbobwahey4540d ago

It seems EA has a tendency to kill off all the franchises that I like, and I suspect Battlefront will probably be amazing and then never see a sequel, as tends to be the case.

I'd love to see new entries in the Burnout, SSX and Bad Company franchises, but EA likes to kill anything good that they have :(

bumnut4540d ago

Thats right, they have another couple of years work to do destroying another franchise :)

RedSoakedSponge4540d ago (Edited 4540d ago )

@jimbobwahey

iv been drooling over the thought of how Burnout could look next gen (aka current gen). they could blow the physics out of the park this time around. Burnout Paradise had incredible damage physics and that was on old tech! Let Criterion make a Burnout game EA!!!

ginsunuva4540d ago

They have to wait until Battlefield's metacritic score dives below 70, then they'll switch over to another franchise and wait for it to die too.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4540d ago
ATiElite4540d ago

Hopefully DICE can concentrate on Mirrors Edge 2 and Battlefront 3 JUST for the PS4/XB1/PC.

Not to slight PS3/X360 owners but 5 platforms development is why BF4 has so many issues.

still want Bad Company 3.

RE_L_MAYER4540d ago

well i can say that mirrors edge will be a disaster...some thing just shouldnt be continued

Zeniix4539d ago

man if they fuck that game up, not sure how pissed I will get

Concertoine4540d ago (Edited 4540d ago )

good, they can focus on battlefront. maybe they won't botch the launch like they did the past umpteen games :l

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4540d ago

No they will because upper management of EA doesn't know what quality control is.

Concertoine4540d ago (Edited 4540d ago )

its like all these devs might as well target a january 1st release date and then fix it all the way to the holidays! it took practically a year of 2GB patches to get bf3 at what shouldve been launch quality.

isa_scout4540d ago

The sad part is that games like this hardly ever released on the Xbox and PS2 or earlier systems. I love online, but recently updates and patches seem to have given developers an excuse to be lazy.

MrSwankSinatra4540d ago (Edited 4540d ago )

isn't there a rumor going around saying EA wants to release a battlefield every year to compete with CoD, so they're gonna outsource the battlefield license to different developers.

M-M4540d ago

I'm fine with that if it means they'll make a BFBC3 next year. After that, I won't buy another Battlefield game. Also, isn't it a little late to complete with COD by using the same tactics? People are really starting to get tired of it as interest in the series has really gone down.

Concertoine4540d ago

i agree i want BFBC3, but EA has called the bad company series "niche" and theyd prefer to release a numbered BF. not sure how well over 6 million copies sold is niche though.
i remember when all kinds of spin offs were going. the series really isnt what it used to be in my opinion.

pompombrum4540d ago

Yup that's what I heard. The rumour is that they've got the dead space 3 developers doing it. I really hope it turns out to be false as it's the last thing Battlefield needs.

maddskull4540d ago

that is a rumor what they actually said that they will not make battlefield a annual game http://www.youtube.com/watc...

DeadlyFire4540d ago

They said no annual title sure, but they did also say they have plans for a shooter rotation with Titanfall, Battlefield, and Battlefront.

Criterion said it has plans to start a new IP that isn't racing. So there goes my burnout hopes. This could fill the 2014 shooter void that EA is leaving open on PS4. Criterion's last FPS was one of the best of a generation with PS2/Xbox title BLACK. I have high hopes if they are going with an FPS.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4540d ago
BobBelcher4540d ago

Kinda like how Call of Duty switches between Infinity Ward and Treyarch...
hmmmmmm....

xxxsiegezzz4540d ago

But the battlefield still won't turn into annual.

Bdxxacjkfs4540d ago

Good. No more BugFields, please. Dead to the Premium sh!t, too!

Show all comments (48)
160°

EA Aims to Make Battlefield an Annual Franchise Within Six Years, Says GM Byron Beede

EA plans to turn Battlefield into an annual series within 5–6 years, General Manager Byron Beede tells analyst Michael Pachter.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: embed code
Christopher269d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community269d ago
ZycoFox269d ago

New game every year is dumb, the only one I saw reasonable improvement that did that was L4D2.. and then they gave up.

-Foxtrot269d ago

Even then with the talent Valve had they could have made it work in L4D and just update it.

The fact is they clearly wanted to have a full game made by them, not Turtle Rock.

The game just felt very different in tone aswell, I liked the dark creepy atmosphere in the first game. In the second it’s all sunny where you are biting tanks with a frying pan. Even the original survivors were better

neutralgamer1992269d ago

I think what EA is aiming for is a three-team development cycle, with each team getting around three years to work on their own Battlefield title. That way, instead of a game being rushed out in a single year, they can stagger the releases. Over a 5–6 year span, the schedule would allow them to put out a new Battlefield every year, while still giving each studio enough time to develop their own entry.

Call of Duty already does this, and we’ve seen that simply giving three years doesn’t automatically guarantee quality. My question is—why can’t EA focus on supporting the current Battlefield for years to come instead of immediately chasing the next release? They’d still be able to make plenty of money without rushing a new game to market.

To be fair, EA has made a few pro-player moves lately, like launching on Steam day one, skipping the EA app requirement, and avoiding overpriced cosmetic skins. But at the end of the day, it’s still EA—and history shows they’ll always chase short-term profit, even at the cost of the game’s long-term health

blacktiger268d ago

Bro Dice is the only team they have going. I can imagine after they are gone it'll be over that's why they have to sell yearly before DICE dies out.

Mroc13268d ago

EA will make most money when the new entry drops. at $70 a pop there's lots to be made. Likely more to be made than selling skins or maps which everyone that has the game will not buy. It's all about profit. I think a release every 2 years will be better. People are getting tired of the yearly releases. We've come a long way in terms of improvements and graphics so there's not much they can add yearly to really improve a game at this point

Ninver269d ago

Not liking the sound of that

monkey602268d ago

I was almost outraged too... until I saw who was saying it. Filing it firmly under BS now.

peppeaccardo269d ago

They put the nails in the coffin with BF 2042, now they are passing the glue on it no matter the outcome of BF6. the way they have treated excelllent games of the likes of BF V is just ridiculous ....

dveio268d ago

Then we'd not only have EA FC, but also EA BC.

"Great"!

Show all comments (25)
190°

New Battlefield Game Being Tested With 120fps Support for PS5 Pro

PS5 Pro owners will be in for a treat with the new Battlefield game currently being developed by DICE based on playtester info.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community352d ago
352d ago Replies(1)
Eonjay352d ago

While thats great... keep in mind that COD has been 120 FPS on PS5 for quite some time... and even supports 120 FPS on Series S. So it would be nice if they could push for 120 FPS on base consoles in the new Battlefield as well.

peppeaccardo351d ago

After I burnt 100 quids on the gold edition of 2042 with a blind pre-order and for as much as they are creating hype on secondary features like the 120 fps thing .... my humble suggestion is to wait for the game to actually release, have it reviewed by REAL gamers and NOT paid Youtubers and if it hits 86 or above on users' review on MetaCritics it will be a buy for me. Any lack of maps, variety, gameplay or key features that they have implemented in other BF game will be a NO GO on my end. More so as this is EA a company I loved in the early era of video gaming but that now has become the king of microtransactions and deceptive marketing.

maximusprime_352d ago

120fps?

Excuse my French, Bl**dy h*ll

thorstein351d ago

Why not? Do tell.

Base PS5 can do 120 fps with HDMI 2.1.

blanka4545351d ago

we will see. not another fail

DaniMacYo351d ago (Edited 351d ago )

But at what cost? At what cost?!? 😁

Show all comments (12)
100°

New Battlefield Game Gun Customization Is Like COD"s Gunsmith But With a Cool Twist

DICE is changing the gun customization in the new Battlefield game, and it's one that emphasizes balance and personalization.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community352d ago
anast352d ago

There must be a new person making the decisions or the person can actually learn.